1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Lexar Announces Crucial RealSSD C300 SATA 6 Gb/s 64GB SSD

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jun 23, 2010.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,431 (11.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,618
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Lexar Media, a leading global provider of memory products for digital media, today introduced a 64GB addition to the award-winning Crucial RealSSD C300 product line. The new 64GB RealSSD C300 drive, like its predecessors, natively supports SATA 6Gb/s, is backwards compatible with the SATA 3Gb/s interface, and provides scorching-fast read speeds of up to 355 MB/s and write speeds up to 75 MB/s. Competitively priced at US$149.99, the new 64GB C300 drive is available in a standard 2.5-inch form factor, and comes with a limited three-year warranty.

    "The 64GB C300 drive is a natural extension of our award-winning Crucial RealSSD C300 product line. This aggressively priced 64GB C300 drive makes SSD technology more affordable than ever, delivers durability for mobile computing, and makes it a compelling boot drive for desktop PCs," said Robert Wheadon, Lexar Media senior worldwide SSD product manager.

    [​IMG]

    The 64GB, 128GB, and 256GB Crucial RealSSD C300 drives are available through select resellers worldwide and online.

    Key Features:
    • The 64GB Crucial RealSSD C300 supports high-speed SATA 6Gb/s interfaces, for optimum read/write performance
    • Competitively priced with other performance drives at US$149.99
    • Leverages Micron RealSSD product design and industry-leading NAND innovations
    • As with the 128GB and 256GB C300 capacities, the 64GB C300 is available in a 2.5-inch form factor
  2. Breathless New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    370 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    35
    Bravo, they listed the price!
  3. Easo

    Easo

    Joined:
    May 19, 2009
    Messages:
    824 (0.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    78
    Location:
    Latvia
    Read 355 MB/s, write 75 MB/s
    Kinda doesnt go together... And such write realy sucks.
  4. araditus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    172 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    You should probably do a bit of research on the controller this thing uses, this drive has more I/Os than most, other than the intel x-treem. In fact in my opinion for a user looking for the most responsive pc experience this is what I chose to run myself,I just got the 128gb versions however.
  5. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,559 (1.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    909
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    Especially because writting is almost always sequential and fast HDD's with lots of cache can perform better than such SSD's. Fully random write pretty much only happens in benchmark tools.
  6. dir_d

    dir_d

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    848 (0.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    110
    Location:
    Manteca, Ca
    Great OS drive you dont write that much to windows anywyas
  7. Yellow&Nerdy?

    Yellow&Nerdy?

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    370 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    48
    The price and read speeds are great. The write sucks though. But I guess it's not that important, because its main purpose is to be a boot-drive. A serious competitor to the SF-1200 SSDs.
  8. tw3akm@ster New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    88 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12
    Location:
    Mauritius
    Anyone has an idea how two of these would perform on RAID 0 on SATA 6Gb/s? eg. using 2x 64GB RAID 0. btarunr any ideas?
  9. araditus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    172 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Upon some research you will find the I/Os on this drive are top notch and not only does it full the SATA II bandwidth its the only single drive out there that can read at speeds that require SATA III. Boot Drive only? Done right these drives are fine for apps as well, the only think I can see you not wanting to put on this hotrod are media files. As mentioned earlier the write doesnt really count only in benchmarks, when you install a program go check the right performance on your spin drive and see what you get, if tis over 25 mbs, ill be wow'd :)
  10. araditus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    172 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    SSD's are known for being near linear in their raid performance unlike spin drives, so if you put two togehter expect about 1.8x the performance of a single drive in this case 600mb/s reads should be no problem.

    However you must consider that most SSD drives are not TRIM or garbage collection capable in raid mode with windows 7 inherently, in which is the bane of most SSD performance, that you should consider as well. as over the course of 2 years they might become dreadfully slow.
  11. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,796 (3.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    545
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    Yeah it is the IOPS on this thing. I love my WD Caviar Green 1.0TB, and it writes a program (install) fine and even plays videos fine. However, its the mini writes all day eberaday and twice on sunday that just kicks its ass. For my awesome system, it slows down (also the spin speed and cache as well hurts it). This is fine for boot and program. Loving the price too. Reads are freaking crazy.
  12. n-ster

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    8,859 (4.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,405
    impressive... you guys keep saying IOPS... how much is it? does it beat my Vertex 2 50gb? If so, I might hate myself lol
  13. Jor3llBR New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    162 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16
    Location:
    Arizona
    50,000 read
    15,000 write
  14. nemesis.ie

    nemesis.ie

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    Messages:
    191 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16
    Does anyone know if using Windows 7 software RAID would keep the TRIM support? And of course, if the performance would be any good. :)

    Maybe someone can try it?
  15. n-ster

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    8,859 (4.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,405
    FUCK !@#$#@#$

    My vertex 2 has the same IOPS as this... only my write IOPS are 3x more :p Not like imana use writing that much though :(

    I know intel has TRIM RAID support... idk about the rest
  16. araditus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    172 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Pics or it didnt happen, I havent found a site yet that this drive isnt top 2 in overall real world results. Fuck syntheic results.
  17. n-ster

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    8,859 (4.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,405
    idk, I just went on ocz's site and it says 50k IOPS in/out
  18. tw3akm@ster New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    88 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12
    Location:
    Mauritius

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page