1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Migrating from 8800GTX -> HD4870, with Crysis WH benchmark

Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by Zehnsucht, Jan 24, 2009.

  1. Zehnsucht

    Zehnsucht New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    439 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    So I pulled the trigger, I got fed up with the nvdlskdlaskdsaj.dll stopped responding and sometimes random artifacts in games on my 8800GTX. And trust me, I tried everything, my last step was to watercool the 8800GTX with temperatures NEVER above 45C.

    Removed drivers -> boot to safe mode -> use driver cleaner -> install 4870 -> unmark Nvidia services at startup to ignore missing dll's -> working flawlessly :)

    Peak power consumption during tests:

    8800GTX 288W
    HD4870 265W

    So here are the results:

    Code:
    Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU          6600  @ 2.40GHz @ 3599 Mhz
    CPU ID: Intel64 Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 6
    Operating System: Microsoft® Windows Vista™ Ultimate  64-bit Service Pack 1
    Physical memory: 4.00 GB
    Display adapter: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX 768 MB
    Driver version: 7.15.11.7824 (20081007123300.000000-000)
    
    //////////// Summary \\\\\\\\\\\\\
    
    01/21/2009 23:30:28 - Microsoft® Windows Vista™ Ultimate  64-bit Service Pack 1
    
    DirectX 9.0c ENTHUSIAST 3X @ Map: ambush @ 0 1680 x 1050 AA 4xx 
    ==> Framerate [ Min: 9.80 Max: 18.37 Avg: 15.10 ]
    
    DirectX 9.0c ENTHUSIAST 3X @ Map: avalanche @ 0 1680 x 1050 AA 4xx 
    ==> Framerate [ Min: 4.42 Max: 20.02 Avg: 15.14 ]
    
    DirectX 9.0c ENTHUSIAST 3X @ Map: frost @ 0 1680 x 1050 AA 4xx 
    ==> Framerate [ Min: 8.63 Max: 18.24 Avg: 14.85 ]
    
    Code:
    Display adapter: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series 512 MB
    Driver version: Catalyst 8.12 (8.561-081201a1-072276C-ATI)
    
    //////////// Summary \\\\\\\\\\\\\
    
    01/22/2009 23:16:28 - Microsoft® Windows Vista™ Ultimate  64-bit Service Pack 1
    
    DirectX 9.0c ENTHUSIAST 3X @ Map: ambush @ 0 1680 x 1050 AA 4xx 
    ==> Framerate [ Min: 10.43 Max: 26.23 Avg: 21.17 ]
    
    DirectX 9.0c ENTHUSIAST 3X @ Map: avalanche @ 0 1680 x 1050 AA 4xx 
    ==> Framerate [ Min: 10.58 Max: 30.32 Avg: 23.91 ]
    
    DirectX 9.0c ENTHUSIAST 3X @ Map: frost @ 0 1680 x 1050 AA 4xx 
    ==> Framerate [ Min: 5.23 Max: 27.24 Avg: 21.99 ]
    
    It's close to 50% increase. Your results may vary.

    I'l follow up with a UT3 bench, since I found some old 8800GTX's results lying around.
     
  2. hat

    hat Maximum Overclocker

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    16,920 (5.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,064
    Location:
    Ohio
    Yeah, the 8800GTX ain't a bad card, but the 4870 is a few generations ahead and is a bit faster.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  3. Zehnsucht

    Zehnsucht New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    439 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    I was actually more surprised by the lower peak power consumption.
     
  4. hat

    hat Maximum Overclocker

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    16,920 (5.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,064
    Location:
    Ohio
    Yeah, it's a step in the right direction but I think 265w is still gluttonous. I wonder how much power my 9800gt sucks down?
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  5. Jeffredo

    Jeffredo

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    783 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    108
    Only time I had "weird artifacting" with my 8800 GTX was when I was trying to OC it. If I left it stock it worked fine. :laugh: But yeah, you will see a nice increase with an HD 4870. I got similar results when I went from an 8800 GTX to a GTX 260.
     
  6. ChiSox

    ChiSox

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    Messages:
    447 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    77
    Location:
    On The Green
    Well considering a ps3 uses about 380w I wouldn't consider 265w gluttonous but when you throw cpu ram hd disk drive HIGH POWER LEDS fans pumps etc. It gets outta control but if you wanna run Crysis 17 u gotta do it until they go back to 8 bit games.
     
  7. hat

    hat Maximum Overclocker

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    16,920 (5.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,064
    Location:
    Ohio
    A ps3 is a full system though. 265w just for a video card is too much IMO. I think it should be more like 100w
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  8. Zehnsucht

    Zehnsucht New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    439 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    265W is FULL system from power outlet.

    This translates with HX520's power efficiency to 230W actual load. FULL SYSTEM.

    Code:
    520     Load (W)        Efficiency      Input (W)
    20 %    104               82.41             126
    30 %    156               84.06             186
    40 %    208               85.65             243
    50 %    260               86.31             301
    60 %    312               86.14             362
    70 %    364               85.68             425
    80 %    416               85.08             489
    90 %    468               84.44             554
    100 %   520               83.84             620
    
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2009
  9. spearman914

    spearman914 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,339 (1.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    502
    Location:
    Brooklyn, New York 11223

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page