1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

MLC vs. TLC

Discussion in 'Storage' started by Snipe343, Sep 11, 2013.

  1. Snipe343

    Snipe343

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2007
    Messages:
    1,002 (0.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    34
    What is the difference between the two?

    I know they're multi level cell, and triple level cell. But I'm having a hard time finding/understanding what these mean in use.

    Also I've read that TLC doesn't last as long? Is that true and if so by how much in comparison to MLC?

    Thanks for any help!
     
  2. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,182 (5.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,971
    Location:
    Home
    Long story short: its all to do with packaging the bits, we have SLC which is one bit to TLC which is 3 bit. TLC comes with the shortest endurance, but you will still need to hammer the drive very hard to make the difference show. Imo only servers need to pay attention, for consumers your computer is more likely to be obsoleted long before the drives reach their expected death time.

    Something interesting: http://techreport.com/review/25320/the-ssd-endurance-experiment-22tb-update
     
    Snipe343 and Kursah say thanks.
  3. BiggieShady

    BiggieShady

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2012
    Messages:
    988 (1.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    328
    Location:
    Zagreb, Croatia
    You would need to write around 40 TB of data for TLC cells to start failing ... they did 22 TB so far
     
  4. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,182 (5.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,971
    Location:
    Home
    I hammered a grand total of 1.25TB over 3 months, and that is indiscriminately downloading videos and games with no regard to endurance. At this rate I will need 8 years to kill my drive, which is about time I should upgrade my SSD. Endurance is a non issue I would say.
     
  5. Sasqui

    Sasqui

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    7,647 (2.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,402
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
    Here's an article that's spot on to your question:

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/5067/understanding-tlc-nand

    MLC has two bits per cell and TLC has 3 bit per cell. With each added bit, there's a lot of complexity added to control each cell. Here: http://www.anandtech.com/show/5067/understanding-tlc-nand/2

    Example of the problem:
     
    Fourstaff says thanks.
  6. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,822 (3.96/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,481
    Location:
    Quantum well (UK)
    Indeed, just think of all those hords of users ranting on forums everywhere about their SSDs dying prematurely! There aren't any. :)

    This was something that I was worried about a while back, but the evidence says otherwise. I haven't bought one yet, because they're still a bit pricey for one of those nice 256GB Samsung 840 Pro ones and I keep spending money on other bits for my PC. Just blew £400 on two graphics cards and a sound card. :D
     
  7. EarthDog

    EarthDog

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,266 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    658
    There are a ton complaining about it... but they are not dieing because of bad NAND, it is controller related.
     
  8. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,822 (3.96/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,481
    Location:
    Quantum well (UK)
    It's surprising to see the controller dieing. I take it this affects the cheaper brands more?
     
  9. EarthDog

    EarthDog

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,266 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    658
    OCZ had a lot of problems with drive death, and it wasnt because of the NAND wearing out. Most drive failures are not because of NAND wearing out. For YEARS people were saying, but nothing ever proved until lately, that you need to write 10GB /day for XX years before NAND would die.
     
    qubit says thanks.
  10. FX-GMC

    FX-GMC

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2013
    Messages:
    845 (2.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    322
    Location:
    Cumberland Plateau
  11. TheOne

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2010
    Messages:
    225 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    68
    Yea, most SSD related issues stem from the firmware, TLC NAND is just slower and has a shorter life expectancy, which is supposed to be the trade off for more cost effective NAND for the consumer market.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page