1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Mozilla Firefox To Pack H.264 Support

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Mar 20, 2012.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,972 (10.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,759
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    It looks like Mozilla has given in to the pressure of incorporating H.264 CODEC into its Firefox web-browser, and could incorporate it in future versions of the browser. The CODEC allows online videos utilizing H.264 format to run. Mozilla has been avoiding H.264 support since it is proprietary, riddled with patents, and requires Mozilla to purchase a license for millions of Dollars from MPEG-LA.

    Mozilla has been trying to push for standards alternative to H.264, such as WebM, and the VP8 format. It had originally planned its push for an H.264-free web at a time when it was a much stronger player in the web-browser market, which now sees a strong presence of Google Chrome, which already features H.264. H.264 is superior to its alternatives, in being lighter on the system's resources (hence, lighter on the battery).

    [​IMG]

    Sources: Engadget, The Inquirer
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2012
    Mussels says thanks.
  2. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,843 (1.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    670
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    Too bad its going to cost them $$$ But some times you have to spend the money to get more attention.
     
  3. NC37

    NC37

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,207 (0.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    270
    But...that means the version a week strategy doesn't work to get attention!! What a cruel world we live in!! Oh the humanity!!! :cry:

    :D
     
  4. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,972 (10.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,759
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Should cost Mozilla about $5 million.
     
  5. Rahmat Sofyan

    Rahmat Sofyan

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    99 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    20
    Location:
    Pekanbaru -Riau - Indonesia - Earth
    ...

    Really, It running well on my Google Chrome...
     
  6. MikeMurphy

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    392 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    53
    Mozilla flopped over pretty easily.

    The H.264 group has quite a disturbing strategy.
     
  7. MikeMurphy

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    392 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    53
    Wait, they flopped because Chrome had H.264? Google isn't backing H.264 and I think they had plans to can it soon.
     
  8. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,972 (10.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,759
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    I think this H.264 license will destabilize a lot of things at Mozilla.
    • Mozilla will no longer be able to guarantee that their product is 100% open-standard/open-source (because it will contain some closed-source code),
    • It won't be able to give away Firefox source-code which contains H.264 CODEC to just about anyone, because that could conflict with the license
    • Browsers that are derived from the Firefox source (eg: Waterfox) will not have access to the H.264 CODEC.
    • It will dent Mozilla's image in the OSS community.
    In my opinion Mozilla should have flipped the bird at H.264 and carried on. H.264 web-content is still in its infancy, and lack of support from Firefox should instead hinder its adoption, not that of Firefox.
     
    MikeMurphy and Breathless say thanks.
  9. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,565 (11.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,836
    pity its such a pain to support, since its such a widely used codec.
     
  10. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,849 (1.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,026
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    Actually from what i heard it won't cost Mozilla anything. Microsoft already paid for H.264 codec so Firefox on Windows platform shouldn't cost Mozilla anything. Same applies to handheld devices, because vendors who made the devices already paid H.264 license. Firefox will just utilize that.
    Not sure if i understood this right but it sort of makes sense.
     
  11. Red_Machine

    Red_Machine

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,763 (1.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    389
    Location:
    Marlow, ENGLAND
    All I have to say is this:

    [​IMG]
     
  12. Isenstaedt

    Isenstaedt New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    211 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    H.264 for streaming online videos? Hmmm... would it allow streaming with multiple connections? I'm tired of downloading files @ 500 KB/s but not be able to stream a video without it having to buffer.
     
  13. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,972 (10.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,759
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    1c3d0g says thanks.
  14. Red_Machine

    Red_Machine

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,763 (1.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    389
    Location:
    Marlow, ENGLAND
    I know of it, but I'd rather it was official. It's been in alpha since Firefox 5, as far as I know.
     
  15. Static~Charge

    Static~Charge

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    474 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    86
    Mussels and 1c3d0g say thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page