1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Mozilla Won’t Fix 80% of Firefox 3.0’s Bugs

Discussion in 'News' started by malware, Nov 16, 2007.

  1. malware New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,476 (1.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    956
    Location:
    Bulgaria
    Mozilla Corp. will fix just 20% of the bugs now in Firefox 3.0 before the final version is released next year, the open-source developer's Web site revealed Wednesday. As Mozilla pushes to post Beta 1 of Firefox 3.0 in time, it has asked developers to prioritize already-identified bugs so that the most important can be fixed. That means 80% of the approximately 700 bugs currently marked as "blockers" will not be fixed for Firefox 3. Firefox 3.0 is months behind the schedule Mozilla set about midyear, when it said the browser would reach Beta 1 in late July and move into a second beta in September, both preceding a final release by the end of the year.

    Source: New York Times
     
  2. WhiteLotus

    WhiteLotus

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    6,567 (2.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    863
    Why would they want to release a buggy bit of software? im sure the average response to this would be that they are willing to wait another month or two to enjoy a non bugged browser
     
  3. MadCow New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    Messages:
    544 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    33
    I can wait another month or too, it's not like I'm excited about a browser. :p
     
  4. Jizzler

    Jizzler

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,626 (1.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    721
    Location:
    Geneva, FL, USA
    Are you enjoying your current browser? Whether it be IE7 or FF2, there's still loads of bugs with both of them, it's just that many of them only affect a small percentage of users in certain configurations.
     
  5. WhiteLotus

    WhiteLotus

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    6,567 (2.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    863
    i use FF2 and it lets me view my webpages without throwing a hissey fit, so yes in answere to your question yes i am. but it is just a browser as long i can view what i want i dont care which i use, just i have gotten used to FF
     
  6. LiNKiN

    LiNKiN Staff

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,761 (0.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    303
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Releasing software that has bugs is nothing new. :roll: Gotta do what you can, with what you have. Deadlines are a b&^#%. :p
     
  7. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,691 (6.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,988
    Location:
    some AF base
    3991vhtes says thanks.
  8. Lu(ky

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Messages:
    108 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    I have been getting about 50 crashes a day now. I am going to delete firefox soon if this shit is not fixed. This is what I like to do to there tech guy in charge of the problems. :nutkick:
     
  9. TheGuruStud

    TheGuruStud

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,778 (0.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    237
    Location:
    Police/Nanny State of America
    Sounds like you have other issues. Firefox hasn't been a crasher for a while now. If you are using a retardedly (is that a word? haha) coded website with java and shit, then, I can see it hanging, but that's not FFs fault.
     
  10. panchoman

    panchoman Sold my stars!

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    9,595 (3.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,200
    my FF never hangs...
     
  11. FatForester New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    971 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    151
    Yea, this isn't that big of a deal. I mean, look at Vista when it was released...
     
  12. Darknova

    Darknova

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    Messages:
    5,037 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    535
    Location:
    Manchester, United Kingdom
    There's a difference between releasing software with bugs, and actually knowing about the bugs before hand and refusing to fix them. Some bugs don't turn up until it's released in the real world, but actually knowing about them first? That's just pathetic.
     
  13. 3991vhtes

    3991vhtes New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,786 (0.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    121
    Location:
    My house.
    that's why I use Opera. Or IE7.
     
  14. RaZrShRp

    RaZrShRp New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    Messages:
    104 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Arizona
    I like Opera. But I dont know how to make it so when I click on a link it pops up in Opera.
     
  15. 3991vhtes

    3991vhtes New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,786 (0.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    121
    Location:
    My house.
    Set Opera as your default browser :)
     
  16. Jizzler

    Jizzler

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,626 (1.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    721
    Location:
    Geneva, FL, USA
    There ya go :) What I'm getting at is there's nothing different between this release and the releases of other browsers (and a load of other software as well). The hundreds of bugs in FF2 aren't affecting you, so it's perceived to be bug-free. FF3 will come out in a few months, work for 9x% of all users despite having ~80% of known bugs not fixed.
     
  17. CrAsHnBuRnXp

    CrAsHnBuRnXp

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Messages:
    5,855 (2.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    817
    Id use Opera if there were more extensions for it such as there is for FF.
     
  18. ChaoticBlankness

    ChaoticBlankness New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    492 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    Location:
    A small crate floating in the Pacific..
    As I huge supporter of FF and Mozilla I'm seriously disgusted with. I refuse to use FF3 until the majority of critical bugs have been fixed. Till then, FF2 has been working for me just fine.
     
  19. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (7.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    I'm willing to bet it's not Firefox's fault. Bad extension or unstable OC are my guesses.
     
  20. Cold Storm

    Cold Storm Battosai

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2007
    Messages:
    15,014 (5.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,999
    Location:
    In a library somewhere on this earth
    I've had so may problems with IE7. Problems that made 2000 just flat out give me BSoD. now that I have XP and Vista and FF running, nothing has happened.
    look at it like this... whenever you get the flu shot, they give you a small dose of the flu in order for your body to learn to fight off it. Some people get sick because they can handle it, and others just never get sick.
    So my point is that software is going to have "bugs" in it because of stuff that was missed or wasn't. They may of never found out how to get rid of it so they let us do it.
    So, I think mozilla is wanting us to fix it.
     
  21. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,812 (3.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    547
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    New browsers arent a heralded part of the computing community. Id rather the product be pretty bug free (lets face it, nothing is totally bug free) then be bugged to hell just so they can reach their "deadline"
     
  22. Darknova

    Darknova

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    Messages:
    5,037 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    535
    Location:
    Manchester, United Kingdom
    Thank you! That's exactly what I think.
     
  23. Cold Storm

    Cold Storm Battosai

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2007
    Messages:
    15,014 (5.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,999
    Location:
    In a library somewhere on this earth
    2nd that
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page