1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

MSI Announces A10 "Trinity" Powered GX60 Gaming Notebook with Radeon HD 7970M

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Sep 26, 2012.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,869 (11.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,716
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    MSI announced the GX60, an AMD-powered gaming notebook first spotted at this year's Computex event. The notebook is powered by an AMD A10-4600M quad-core "Trinity" APU, Radeon HD 7970M discrete graphics processor with 2 GB GDDR5 memory, and up to 16 GB dual-channel DDR3-1600 MHz memory. Its storage components include 128 GB SuperRAID SSD, 750 GB hard drive, Blu-ray writer or Blu-ray + DVD-RW combo drive. The 15.6-inch anti-glare screen packs 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution. Other gaming-grade features include Bigfoot Killer NIC, keyboard made by SteelSeries, and HD webcam. Pricing differs with optional components.

    [​IMG]

    Source: Engadget
     
    nt300, Super XP and mypg0306 say thanks.
  2. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,098 (4.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,282
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    I hear 7970m, @ 1100 MHz, is like a desktop 7950 @ 900 MHz.


    :eek:
     
  3. dieterd New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2011
    Messages:
    120 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
  4. Atom_Anti

    Atom_Anti New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2007
    Messages:
    176 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    Captiva Isaland, Florida USA
    That Super-raid SSD sounds very interesting, actually the whole laptop is! Great job MSI, looking forward to see a nice review;).
     
  5. Atom_Anti

    Atom_Anti New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2007
    Messages:
    176 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    Captiva Isaland, Florida USA
    Even a 2 Core I3 capable for gaming close as much as big I7 CPUs. Do not write silly things, read here CPU contest in gaming with GeForce GTX 680M.

    And the Quad Core A10-4600M about level with Twin-core Intel i5 if program use all available Cores:

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2012
    Nihilus and JKnows say thanks.
  6. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,514 (1.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    531
    Really? I'd heard that the 7970M is basically hit-and-miss as often as not thanks to AMD's enduring woes with Enduro.
    [source] [source][source]
    When forum threads get closed down by the manufacturer it's usually a sign that things aren't going to plan
    [​IMG]
     
  7. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,683 (6.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    Since everyone is freaking out there is an Intel version floating around in the same case with the 7970 as well. I for one wouldn't mind going with the AMD one if it is a good bit cheaper.
     
    eidairaman1 says thanks.
  8. dieterd New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2011
    Messages:
    120 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2

    1. to compare i3 to A10 will be big flattering for A10!
    2. Yes - I know that i3 like CPU in most games won't make any bottle neck vs i7, but here is the "gamingmachine" accordingly priced and it was "most games". and for that price you get something like B950 in CPU department!!!! - even 1 ssd would be overkill for that system
    3. and I am just silly ;)
     
  9. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,683 (6.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    It has a 15.6" screen, 1080P and the option for raid'd SSD's (they are not in every laptop) The 1080P screen shouldn't be bottlenecked by an A10 or i3 or i5 or whatever.
     
  10. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    10,132 (6.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,322
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    I love the way MSI gaming laptops look. I wouldn't mind having this one.
     
  11. NC37

    NC37

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,203 (0.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    268
    2 months ago MSI, 2 months ago...oh well, i7 ftw!
     
  12. NeoXF

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Messages:
    615 (0.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    80
    IMHO... they seriously need to release faster iterations on their CPUs for mobile... the 4 real-cores to 4 almost-cores transition doesn't look that great, but I agree in some aspects it worked out well. However, I expect the Steamroller mobile APU is gonna kick (even more) ass... Hopefully they will have a triple or quad module version (6 almost-almost-cores LOL)... or double module with 3 or 4 cores each.
     
  13. mypg0306

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    270 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    99
    Nice gaming laptop. Don't know when can I afford to own this machine.
     
  14. ramcoza New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2011
    Messages:
    17 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6
    What he said is A10 is not a gaming APU. It's good for media PC or light gaming environments. But it cannot be a CPU for a Gaming Laptop, specially when having a high-end GPU like 7970M or 680M. For that i3 or i5 is the great option. Moreover 7970M's enduro technology is having major issues. Because of that, it cannot flawlessly work with the CPU, unlike nvidia optimus technology. If you don't believe, go and google it. Because of enduro problem sometimes the gamer is only having about 20 FPS performance and sometimes the battery drain is higher than nvidia optimus. That's why we don't see much of 7970Ms in laptops despite having a great value.
     
  15. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    13,473 (4.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,750
    Gaming on a battery in a laptop. Makes me laugh. Laptops with high end parts are normally called desktop replacements. Great perf fair battery life.

    Trinity Core is capable of driving the gpu. Otherwise it wouldnt be sold.
     
    Atom_Anti says thanks.
  16. tacosRcool

    tacosRcool

    Joined:
    May 14, 2012
    Messages:
    860 (0.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    71
    gaming on the go at a reasonable price?
     
  17. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,773 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    539
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis
    I agree Steamroller should have the ability to put AMD back into strong performance competition. But your comment regarding "4 real cores to 4 almost codes transition is flawed. Define a core? Anyhow, eventually we will see Intel once again copy AMD.

    With AMD's approach to CPU module design, AMD can offer 2x more cores than conventional designs. In about a few years, this design will mature and AMD would benefit.
     
    Lionheart, nt300 and Atom_Anti say thanks.
  18. TheGuruStud

    TheGuruStud

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,643 (0.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    173
    Location:
    Police/Nanny State of America

    Hey, no logic or reasoning allowed, here!

    He's right. Fab costs will be skyrocketing and even intel will struggle to make monolithic cores. Plus, IPC is becoming maxed. The only reason HT works is b/c of sloppy coding. AMD decided it's cheaper and more efficient (if TSMC/GloFo didn't suck), to make these modules and share a few things vs big cores with more threads.

    Properly coded software that isn't ICC only, runs great on AMD. The servers are killer (and dirt cheap) and linux performance is fantastic (I guess 2600/2700k is slow too :rolleyes:). Single thread will be forced out (cmon lazy devs), eventually.

    Keep flaming AMD, b/c you know intel will just keep copying them :laugh:
    I'm not excusing their poor execution and delays, but the µarch is sound, if just unpolished.

    Remember, software is responsible for nearly all speed. You can gain up to several hundred of percent in performance just from using optimized compilers and tuned code.

    I can provide you a small, personal real world example that was barely optimized soon after BD launch:
    I was encoding a TV show at 720 from 1080 source using x264:

    My PII at 3.8 GHz was achieving a mind blowing 8 fps as a kind of reference :laugh:
    I slapped in the 8120 and OCed to 4.2.
    I used the same encoder ver and got 22 fps. I thought not bad, but not spectacular.
    Then, I saw that preliminary support for BD was out (FMA).
    I ran it and got a kick ass 30 fps.
    The settings for quality were stupidly maxed out, btw.

    Now, that's more than just regular tuning since it supported new instructions, but the results aren't any different. (Especially, considering that ICC disables instructions and uses crappy libraries for AMD :wtf:) "Marketing" money also goes a long way.
     
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2012
    HD64G says thanks.
  19. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,773 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    539
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis
    I fully agree software is the #1 culprit for processor performance. But that does not excuse AMD's lack luster management regarding Bulldozer's unique design but limited performance gains. The design is great, good job on that, just not expected properly.

    As I said many times, 3rd and 4th generation Bulldozer's should quadruple in performance via design modifications alone. Then comes software, and if implemented properly should gain even more.

    If Intel does not move to something such as a modular approach, they are in trouble, unless of course they develop something better.
     
  20. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,683 (6.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    It doesn't matter what Intel does if the server market goes AMD then the market will swing AMD. Thereare way more cpus sold to the server market than enthusiast.
     
  21. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    13,473 (4.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,750
    AMD really needs a chip that will perform because if it doesnt stock holders are likely to drop out too
     
  22. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,514 (1.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    531
    400+% performance improvement between Bulldozer and Excavator!?!?!?......
    [​IMG]
    Why bother guessing about something that is already fairly well known?
     
  23. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,773 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    539
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page