1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti Twin Frozr II OC 1024 MB

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by W1zzard, Mar 3, 2011.

  1. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,645 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,384
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2011
  2. mstenholm

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,029 (1.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,139
    Your words - "Temperatures of the card are high which is caused by the high power consumption and the fairly weak cooler" 66 C OC'ed is that high? You normally want +70 C and low noise and that you got here according to your figures.
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  3. mudkip

    mudkip

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2008
    Messages:
    1,226 (0.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    148
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    yeah temps aren't high at all?
  4. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,645 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,384
    fixed, was a copy and paste problem
  5. thebluebumblebee

    thebluebumblebee

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,883 (1.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,422
    Nice review.

    I wish you'd test the power consumption when OC'd to see how much more power it's using for the %performance increase.
  6. mstenholm

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,029 (1.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,139
    The 66 C and the "fan noise" of 39 db(A) are still the same and so are the the power draw at normal and peak. Can't recall the maximume vaule. Is that the one that you have changed? Still a shift in evaluating GPUs.

    Edit: Saw you reply below...sorry didn't read the text, I'm an engineer ;)
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2011
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  7. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,645 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,384
    i have changed the text below the temperature graph. the data is correct
  8. sLowEnd New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    33 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    I'm curious, why do you still put "DirectX 11 relevance limited at this time" as a con?
    Pretty much every contemporary card has support for it, so it's not like a customer is paying extra specifically for DirectX 11.
  9. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,645 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,384
    many new games are coming out without dx11 support. it's not like today's gamer REALLY MUST have dx11
  10. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,541 (2.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    842
    excellent review as always, and I like that MSI improve on the card in all respects of the pcb/cooling/clockspeeds/bundled software, yet charge MSRP for the card, hats off.
  11. stupido

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    150 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    Belgium
    I also agree with sLowEnd on this one...
    dx11 is just a feature that though not very relevant today, but probably will be more relevant tomorrow... so I kind of don't see why it has to be part of cons or pros

    But for the rest, excellent review :) as usual... :)
  12. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,645 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,384
    that's what i'm saying
  13. stupido

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    150 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    Belgium
    Indeed, but my point is that probably you could skip it as feature worth mentioning at all... ;)

    I mean once in pros you say that dx11 is supported but than in cons you say it is limited relevance... so it is kind a pointless - at least that is how I interpret it.

    Anyhow, I usually automatically filter that during reading, and it is up to you to decide what you put as pros/cons... ;) I don't say it is bad though (I really like your reviews! and this web site I visit on daily base, even multiple times per day...)
  14. DeerDance

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2011
    Messages:
    12 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Probably should have been mentioned the lack of passive VRM heatsink in contrast with asus or gigabyte or reference design card... but I don't know how much does that passive matter, but from the long time permanent OC it would feel better to have it...
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2011
  15. theJesus

    theJesus

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2008
    Messages:
    3,965 (1.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    859
    Location:
    Ohio
    I think I spotted a typo on the test setup where you list the drivers used. It says 266.56, but I think you meant 266.66
  16. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,645 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,384
    266.56 are the latest gtx 560 drivers by nvidia
  17. theJesus

    theJesus

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2008
    Messages:
    3,965 (1.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    859
    Location:
    Ohio
  18. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,645 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,384
    seems they have 266.66 up now .. i used 266.56, the launch day reviewer driver
    theJesus says thanks.
  19. theJesus

    theJesus

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2008
    Messages:
    3,965 (1.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    859
    Location:
    Ohio
    Oh, that makes more sense. I wasn't aware of a 266.56 driver release until now. :eek:
  20. JSean New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Looking at the data for 1920x1080 World of Warcraft gaming I see that the 560 TI and the 570 suffer a ~30% performance hit from previous review of the GTX 460 cards. The review on the 460 showed 108 FPS while the 500 series cards are in the high 70's low 80's.

    The drivers have changed for NVidia during that time period but similar results are not reflected in performance data from other games (Battleforge).

    I also see a similar performance decrease in the 5870 results.

    Did this slip under everyone's radar? A 30% decrease is hard to miss.

    Other sites (Toms) are claiming performance gains with the release of Cataclysm. TechPowerUp's data tells a completely different story.
  21. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,645 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,384
    using dx11 in wow reduces fps for me
  22. trt740

    trt740

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    10,935 (3.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,113
    I tried one of these when they first came out and could not get it to boot in my system, but now I tried it again after trying a few other cards , Evga GTX 560 TI, MSi Hawk GTX 460, Gigabyte 6950 and this card is flat out unreal. The 6950 was also unreal but I like this card a bit better. It has lower temps and I like the extra effects. This card is really hard to top, and I think the review is not right the fan is very quiet and even when audible is not annoying at all. It is a great card if your looking for a fast as hell 560TI.
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2011
  23. dia8el New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2011
    Messages:
    3 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Verry HOT!

    Unfortunatelly i bought HOT one :(

    FAN control: AUTO
    OC: none/ just as it was made in factory
    DRIVERS: 280.26
    SYSTEM: VISTA

    TESTED IN: FURMARK


    TEMPERATURE: 100C !!!


    [​IMG]


    Damn bad!
    I am going to my shop and they will take look, because this is verry wrong
  24. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,456 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    875
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    Why do ppl even boher with this stupid FurMark as it has completelly unrelistic load on GPU.
    If you want a realistic scene, use Crysis 2 with DX11 in a MP level full of players. What you'll get there is a realistic temperature. And i can safely say it will never be 100°C...
  25. dia8el New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2011
    Messages:
    3 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    you haver right

    but that card should defend herself with fan auto set to 100% - don't you think?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page