• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

MSI to Integrate Killer NIC with Motherboards?

Solaris17

Super Dainty Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
25,743 (3.79/day)
Location
Alabama
System Name Rocinante
Processor I9 13900ks
Motherboard EVGA z690 Dark KINGPIN
Cooling EK-AIO Elite 360 D-RGB
Memory 64GB Gskill Trident Z5 DDR5 6000 @6400
Video Card(s) MSI SUPRIM Liquid X 4090
Storage 1x 500GB 980 Pro | 1x 1TB 980 Pro | 1x 8TB Corsair MP400
Display(s) Odyssey OLED G9 G95SC
Case Lian Li o11 Evo Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) Moondrop S8's on Schiit Hel 2e
Power Supply Bequiet! Power Pro 12 1500w
Mouse Lamzu Atlantis (White)
Keyboard Monsgeek M3 Lavender, Akko Crystal Blues
VR HMD Quest 3
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores I dont have time for that.
And most home-based routers have shitty QoS, so this can technically help. If only routers would use the Broadcom BCM4712 chipset again (which had near-realtime QoS) that we wouldn't need things like the "Killer NIC".

whats the point of the killer nics QoS if you connect it to a router with shitty QoS or have no other apps on your PC soaking up bandwidth theirfor your game didnt have much choke on the line to begin with?

thats like changing the speed limit to 95 when the roads to unsafe to drive at that speed anyway so no one ever does.
 
Joined
May 7, 2009
Messages
5,392 (0.99/day)
Location
Carrollton, GA
System Name ODIN
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 Aorus Elite AX V2
Cooling Dark Rock 4
Memory G Skill RipjawsV F4 3600 Mhz C16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ventus 3X OC LHR
Storage Crucial 2 TB M.2 SSD :: WD Blue M.2 1TB SSD :: 1 TB WD Black VelociRaptor
Display(s) Dell S2716DG 27" 144 Hz G-SYNC
Case Fractal Meshify C
Audio Device(s) Onboard Audio
Power Supply Antec HCP 850 80+ Gold
Mouse Corsair M65
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB Lux
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores I don't benchmark.
whats the point of the killer nics QoS if you connect it to a router with shitty QoS or have no other apps on your PC soaking up bandwidth their for your game didnt have much choke on the line to begin with?

thats like changing the speed limit to 95 when the roads to unsafe to drive at that speed anyway so no one ever does.

You can then simply turn the routers QoS off since you will not need it. And your PC will occasionally check in with some software like your virus scanner, IM programs, E-mail clients, windows update servers, and QoS which sends back confirmation packets about receiving the data. The Killer NIC does organize and delegate traffic like QoS. It flat out blocks communication to any program other than ones you pick.

Also the Killer NIC is just a luxury item like a high end sound card. Did you really need it, no. Was the onbound audio chip good enough....yeah. Then why buy a sound card....because good enough is not how you roll. Do you need a dedicated network processor....no. Does it work better than the onbound NIC.....yeah (even if it is only slightly in most situations).

I still would like to see a review done by TPU for one of the new Killer NIC's. Especially with games that tax your CPU while playing online and against BFBC2 latency correction BS. Does it help more offloading the network processing for a Dual core than a Quad? As well as test some of its other claims like being about the download a large file or torrents while game with no performance lose to your game.
 

micksh

New Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
26 (0.01/day)
I still would like to see a review done by TPU for one of the new Killer NIC's. Especially with games that tax your CPU while playing online and against BFBC2 latency correction BS. Does it help more offloading the network processing for a Dual core than a Quad? As well as test some of its other claims like being about the download a large file or torrents while game with no performance lose to your game.

I've seen some reviews previously (maybe for previous generation of the card). Everybody compared Killer NIC with cheap on-board controller like Realtek. Nobody compared it with $30 Intel PRO NIC card.
This would make sense to me - to compare it with inexpensive NIC add-on card that provides better traffic offloading than MB NIC, along with adding CFosSpeed to the test.
 

Temujin

New Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2010
Messages
48 (0.01/day)
MSI is a little bit late to the game it seems, but I can't say more, wait and see at CES ;)

For what it's worth, some people are likely to buy just that kind of a product btarunr, not saying I'm one of them though...

MSI has a few more agreements and restrictions than the other vendors. They aren't in a position where they can readily market new features as early and quickly as the other vendors.

Let's hope the bundle includes a set of magnetic go-faster-stripes that I can stick on my case to make the PC go a little bit faster. It's true! It's true! The magnetic stickers helps to transfer heat in addition to reducing dangerous radiation. LOL. http://www.crossdressers.com/forums/images/smilies/Bonk.gif

Stickers work. Adding a gaudy aluminum spoiler would help more. Would a fart tube muffler be too much performance?

At this point, vendors are going to be using Intel LAN Pro and Killer while some will still use Realtek. I like that Realtek can and has opened up licensing on their audio codecs to emulate much more capable performance. But, their NIC (integrated LAN) is much less capable than Intel or Killer. It's slower and crawls when you're pushing too many connections at once. The Realtek NICs just don't have the resources and end up pushing the load back on the CPU. So, anything is a bonus!


MSI has just lost a little bit of credibility with this nonsense...
 
Joined
Nov 2, 2010
Messages
166 (0.03/day)
Location
Philippines! :D
System Name Noobie XTXx || Portalet Crap Machine
Processor i5 2500K @ 4.5, 1.345V || i7 2640QM
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 PRO || Dell
Cooling CM Hyper 212+ || Stock
Memory 2 x 2gb GSkill DDR3 9-9-9-24 || 8GB DDR3
Video Card(s) PowerColor 6970PCS @stock || Optimus (525m)
Storage WD Caviar Blue 500 + 320 Hitachi || 500GB
Display(s) LG W2253TQ || Crappy 1366*768 15"
Case CM 690 PURE Black
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply ThermalTake Toughpower XT 775w
Software Win 7 64bit
I'd hit it if it didn't came with a price premium.. but then I might as well walk on the sun :p
 

TurdFergasun

New Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
111 (0.02/day)
System Name fred
Processor 3570k @ 4.5ghz
Motherboard Z77-UD5H
Cooling noctua nh-c14
Memory 8gb crucial ddr3 1866
Video Card(s) xfx 6950
Storage crucial m4 256gb
Display(s) benq ew2420
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply PCPC silencer 750w v.1
it be nice to see someone building in actual intel NICs into mobo's, hell even intel slaps on realtek junk for most of their mobos. this is prol just like an intel nic, but with more stickers, higher price, and slightly worse performance.
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2008
Messages
675 (0.12/day)
Location
Hungary / Budapest
System Name Kincsem
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Motherboard GIGABYTE X570S AERO G
Cooling Be Quiet Black Rock 4 Pro
Memory HyperX 128GB Fury 4×32GB 3200MHz HX432C16FB3K4/128
Video Card(s) Sapphire AMD RX 7900 XT Pulse
Storage Samsung 970PRO 500GB + Samsung 980PRO 2TB + Adata SX8200 2TB + WD Ultrastar HC550 16TB
Display(s) Acer QHD 27"@144Hz 1ms + UHD 27"@60Hz
Case Cooler Master CM 690 III
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME GOLD 850W
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero
Keyboard HyperX Alloy Elite RGB
Software Windows 10-64
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/4d8n02 https://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/g46uc
This product is already passed it's EOL
 

Temujin

New Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2010
Messages
48 (0.01/day)
it be nice to see someone building in actual intel NICs into mobo's, hell even intel slaps on realtek junk for most of their mobos. this is prol just like an intel nic, but with more stickers, higher price, and slightly worse performance.

Your hope will become reality very, very soon. Intel isn't the only one offering Intel LAN Pro on the boards. :)
 

stasdm

New Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
42 (0.01/day)
Why not to use Mellanox or Cisco 10GB NIC with universal 1/10GB RJ45 connector then?

Will REALLY improve LAN speed, no matter, gaming or not - and with not too big price premium, compared with BigFoot solution.

:):toast::)
 

stasdm

New Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
42 (0.01/day)
10Gbit LAN won't make any difference if your inbound/outbound doesn't even reach 100 Mbit...

Thouse chips fully offload TCP/IP from CPU and speed up transactions, so WILL make difference.

But will the price increase be justified (same for Big Foot)?
 

TurdFergasun

New Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
111 (0.02/day)
System Name fred
Processor 3570k @ 4.5ghz
Motherboard Z77-UD5H
Cooling noctua nh-c14
Memory 8gb crucial ddr3 1866
Video Card(s) xfx 6950
Storage crucial m4 256gb
Display(s) benq ew2420
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply PCPC silencer 750w v.1
probably no difference on anything faster than a dual core cpu with a decent amount of ram. which would make one wonder why would someone with a dual core cpu needing to free up cpu cycles would waste their money on a faster nic in the first place. you want better lan, get rid of off the shelf routers. pfsense, with intel nics = network superiority :rockout:
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2008
Messages
675 (0.12/day)
Location
Hungary / Budapest
System Name Kincsem
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Motherboard GIGABYTE X570S AERO G
Cooling Be Quiet Black Rock 4 Pro
Memory HyperX 128GB Fury 4×32GB 3200MHz HX432C16FB3K4/128
Video Card(s) Sapphire AMD RX 7900 XT Pulse
Storage Samsung 970PRO 500GB + Samsung 980PRO 2TB + Adata SX8200 2TB + WD Ultrastar HC550 16TB
Display(s) Acer QHD 27"@144Hz 1ms + UHD 27"@60Hz
Case Cooler Master CM 690 III
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME GOLD 850W
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero
Keyboard HyperX Alloy Elite RGB
Software Windows 10-64
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/4d8n02 https://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/g46uc
Thouse chips fully offload TCP/IP from CPU and speed up transactions, so WILL make difference.

But will the price increase be justified (same for Big Foot)?

LOL
If you have a 4 core CPU, network traffic wont matter :toast:
 
Joined
May 14, 2010
Messages
901 (0.18/day)
Location
NYU
System Name Baby Box
Processor i5 4670K @ 4GHz
Motherboard Asus Z97I-PLUS
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX FURY DDR3 1600MHz @ CL10
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 780 Dual FTW w/ EVGA ACX Cooler
Storage Crucial M500 240GB SSD (Boot Drive); Seagate 7200.12 1TB 7200RPM (Storage)
Display(s) ASUS VH222H 21.5" 1920x1080
Case Corsair 250D Mini ITX
Audio Device(s) Audioengine D1 DAC/Amp
Power Supply Cooler Master GX RS750 PSU
Mouse Corsair SCIMITAR RGB
Keyboard Corsair Vengeance K70 RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro x64/ Linux Mint 17.3
As long as it doesn't raise the price too much, then it's alright with me.
 

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (3.81/day)
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
Yes and no. Router QoS is more like a post-processing. It does help a bit but not as much as CFosSpeed which works on a driver level on a system where stuff (packets) is actually issued.
It just works better if the system actually knows what has issued a certain packet and under what conditions than re-organizing them when they are already on a highway of packets...

It doesn't work better when you have multiple devices on your network, it only helps a single device.

It processes packets no differently than a router.

And good routers allow you to tweak your QoS settings for specific programs on your network, just like good software.

I've played with Cfos, and it's no better than a good router. It's leagues better than earlier implementations of router based QoS, but not better than the good ones out there now, especially in multiple device situations.

You can then simply turn the routers QoS off since you will not need it. And your PC will occasionally check in with some software like your virus scanner, IM programs, E-mail clients, windows update servers, and QoS which sends back confirmation packets about receiving the data. The Killer NIC does organize and delegate traffic like QoS. It flat out blocks communication to any program other than ones you pick.

Also the Killer NIC is just a luxury item like a high end sound card. Did you really need it, no. Was the onbound audio chip good enough....yeah. Then why buy a sound card....because good enough is not how you roll. Do you need a dedicated network processor....no. Does it work better than the onbound NIC.....yeah (even if it is only slightly in most situations).

I still would like to see a review done by TPU for one of the new Killer NIC's. Especially with games that tax your CPU while playing online and against BFBC2 latency correction BS. Does it help more offloading the network processing for a Dual core than a Quad? As well as test some of its other claims like being about the download a large file or torrents while game with no performance lose to your game.
You can't compare a NIC to a sound card. The difference between on-board sound and a sound card is DRASTIC, the difference between the Killer NIC and on-board is very minor in comparison.
 

WarEagleAU

Bird of Prey
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
10,812 (1.67/day)
Location
Gurley, AL
System Name Pandemic 2020
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 "Gen 2" 2600X
Motherboard AsRock X470 Killer Promontory
Cooling CoolerMaster 240 RGB Master Cooler (Newegg Eggxpert)
Memory 32 GB Geil EVO Portenza DDR4 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) ASUS Radeon RX 580 DirectX 12 DUAL-RX580-O8G 8GB 256-Bit GDDR5 HDCP Ready CrossFireX Support Video C
Storage WD 250 M.2, Corsair P500 M.2, OCZ Trion 500, WD Black 1TB, Assorted others.
Display(s) ASUS MG24UQ Gaming Monitor - 23.6" 4K UHD (3840x2160) , IPS, Adaptive Sync, DisplayWidget
Case Fractal Define R6 C
Audio Device(s) Realtek 5.1 Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RMX 850 Platinum PSU (Newegg Eggxpert)
Mouse Razer Death Adder
Keyboard Corsair K95 Mechanical & Corsair K65 Wired, Wireless, Bluetooth)
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
I actually like this idea though I Would be more apt to get one with it integrated rather than the card itseld.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,255 (4.66/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X12 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
I wish all motherboards had hardware NICs (Killer NIC or otherwise). I hope it catches on so it (hardware NIC on a chip) becomes as cheap as Marvell chips are today.

The same goes for audio.


Hell, Bigfoot Networks should invest in developing a hardware NIC on a chip. If done right, they won't cost much more than current chips and would bring in a whole lot of money through volume if they can make deals with big motherboard manufacturers.
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2008
Messages
2,665 (0.47/day)
System Name Dire Wolf IV
Processor Intel Core i9 14900K
Motherboard Asus ROG STRIX Z790-I GAMING WIFI
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280
Memory 2x24GB Corsair DDR5 6667
Video Card(s) NVIDIA RTX4080 FE
Storage AORUS Gen4 7300 1TB + Western Digital SN750 500GB
Display(s) Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED, 3440x1440, 165hz)
Case Corsair Airflow 2000D
Power Supply Corsair SF1000L
Mouse Razer Deathadder Essential
Keyboard Chuangquan CQ84
Software Windows 11 Professional
I wish all motherboards had hardware NICs (Killer NIC or otherwise). I hope it catches on so it (hardware NIC on a chip) becomes as cheap as Marvell chips are today.

The same goes for audio.

Hell, Bigfoot Networks should invest in developing a hardware NIC on a chip. If done right, they won't cost much more than current chips and would bring in a whole lot of money through volume if they can make deals with big motherboard manufacturers.

Nearly every single motherboard does have a hardware NIC (integrated into the chipset logic) today. It is the feature set of that NIC that actually matters.

As for it not costing much more than current chips, I can quote you some chip prices for server NICs (which the "Killer" NIC pretty much is, just in a snazzier package) which perform TCP/IP offloading, among other things. These start at around 0.7-1$ for the chip itself for a 1Gbps NIC (often also needed is an external PHY placed on the motherboard) and can reach well over 100$ for the chip alone for a high-end 10Gbps NIC (a whole PCIe card with one of these can run into the several thousands of dollars range).
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,255 (4.66/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X12 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
By hardware NIC I mean NPU (Network Processor Unit) with dedicated RAM (which is what Killer NIC is) as opposed to an interface chip that interprets data for the CPU.

The $100 price tag comes from rarity/targeting at enterprise customers. Hardware NIC on a chip would need an NPU with IMC and an adequately sized RAM bank directly on the chip. A 64 MiB DDR chip costs, what, $3? All told, the NIC on a chip should cost about $5 each or less (depending on fab) and be capable of 1 Gbps. It is difficult to estimate how much more 10 Gbps would cost. It may actually be about the same price with a difference in clockspeed.

We have the technology to do it but we don't simply because Marvell NICs are "good enough."
 

stasdm

New Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
42 (0.01/day)
I would place the chip in the section of (often nearly useless) givemeyoumoney "inventions" - same as PCIe x1 SATA "6G" Marvell chips and nVidia x16 bus for graphics cards and SLI licensing - things that a bit better than other used, but still not compliing with the standards, and highly overpriced.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,686 (0.80/day)
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
The main issue with this arrangement is drivers. The latest killer software is great in theory, but has issues. Laggy menus with monitoring on, loss of connection between the service and the exe. The benefits of the card itself are still hard to quantify in a benchmark. Both myself and a friend have experienced notable snappiness changes with the card. In wow for instance icons update faster. Technically there shouldn't even be an effect on wow as it uses tcp. Overall I'm not convinced the killer is great as much as I'm convinced something is fundamentally wrong with onboard nics. I'd be willing to bet you'd get these noticeable increases with any good add on card. A test I'd like to see would be one involving a 2100, a nice intel card, and maybe multiple onboard nics in a much more in-depth and clever benchmark suite. Maybe going as far as recording gaming sessions and doing a frame by frame analysis.
 
Joined
May 7, 2009
Messages
5,392 (0.99/day)
Location
Carrollton, GA
System Name ODIN
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 Aorus Elite AX V2
Cooling Dark Rock 4
Memory G Skill RipjawsV F4 3600 Mhz C16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ventus 3X OC LHR
Storage Crucial 2 TB M.2 SSD :: WD Blue M.2 1TB SSD :: 1 TB WD Black VelociRaptor
Display(s) Dell S2716DG 27" 144 Hz G-SYNC
Case Fractal Meshify C
Audio Device(s) Onboard Audio
Power Supply Antec HCP 850 80+ Gold
Mouse Corsair M65
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB Lux
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores I don't benchmark.
You can't compare a NIC to a sound card. The difference between on-board sound and a sound card is DRASTIC, the difference between the Killer NIC and on-board is very minor in comparison.

I disagree
 

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (3.81/day)
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
I disagree
On what point? Sound card or NIC?

The benefits of a sound card over on-board have been proven time and time again thru accuracy testing.

The benefits for an aftermarket NIC vs on-board on a desktop PC have not.

Doesn't matter if you disagree or not.
 
Joined
May 7, 2009
Messages
5,392 (0.99/day)
Location
Carrollton, GA
System Name ODIN
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 Aorus Elite AX V2
Cooling Dark Rock 4
Memory G Skill RipjawsV F4 3600 Mhz C16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ventus 3X OC LHR
Storage Crucial 2 TB M.2 SSD :: WD Blue M.2 1TB SSD :: 1 TB WD Black VelociRaptor
Display(s) Dell S2716DG 27" 144 Hz G-SYNC
Case Fractal Meshify C
Audio Device(s) Onboard Audio
Power Supply Antec HCP 850 80+ Gold
Mouse Corsair M65
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB Lux
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores I don't benchmark.
On what point? Sound card or NIC?

The benefits of a sound card over on-board have been proven time and time again thru accuracy testing.

The benefits for an aftermarket NIC vs on-board on a desktop PC have not.

Doesn't matter if you disagree or not.

I disagree with both of your points if you really want to know. You said it yourself, this card has never been truly put through the rigger so to speak. I remember the initial release yielded a few "reviews" where the guys just stuck the card into their existing machines and played some games. Then they all concluded that it does what it said, but cost too much. I simple want a real review with the card used in multiple system setups, across multiple online games, and use some for of medium to calculate statistical difference over other NIC's (that use different background systems).

I also never said a dedicated sound card did not yield benefits. I stated it was a luxury item and largely not a requirement when building a system as the on-board does work good enough for most people. On this point is where I made a comparison between the two.
 
Top