Discussion in 'General Software' started by 20mmrain, Mar 7, 2011.
rickss69 - 2483 - 98.6 - ASUS GTX 580 @ 976/1132/1952 - i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz - DX11
xvi | 631 | 25.0 | HD4870 @ 750/900 | Phenom II 550 BE @ 3.8GHz | DX10
xvi | 640 | 25.4 | HD4870 @ 750/900 and HD4850 @ 665/993 Crossfire | Phenom II 550 BE @ 3.8GHz | DX10
Previous 4850 runs:
xvi | 369 | 14.6 | HD4850 @ 665/993 | Phenom II 550 BE @ 3.8GHz | DX10
Same as above, just another run.
Got 377 on a third run, no screencap.
Thanks.... Yes I did get the promotion at my Work.... So I am happy! Started it last week. It was rough though... allot of learning plus 12 hour days while I was training. So thanks for the congrats!!!
2. I got my new i7 2600k Water cooled rig up and running (For all intents and purposes) I might mount the Micro Res somewhere else or get a new Res.... but here it is for right now....Sorry about the blurry pic.....(And yes I was one of the ten lucky people to get the new Maximus Extreme IV while it was in stock at New Egg and no I am not kidding there were only 10 of us!)
3. And Finally Scores are updated!!! WTG to RICKSS69 for taking over the ATI DX11 Leader Board!!!
I can't wait to get some new benches with my i7 2600k now Well keep the scores coming guys I am back.
Why such a low resolution? Whatever. I'll give you my score at your low resolution and a score at 1080p. High end cards, and crossfire configurations really need a high resolution to breathe.
Downloading now, then I'll edit my scores into this post.
LMFAO My bad..... I will change it
Yeah I understand.... but this way too people with lower end cards aren't blown out of the water so bad..... hey it's hurting my two 6950's too!
Yea i was just looking at the scores and noticed your score with the 4850 crossfire and was like they should of scored close to my single 4870X2.
Have you tested with different drivers? it doesn't seem like crossfire was even working when you did that run?
Im going to retest mine soon with older drivers and see what happens.
damric - 2415 - 95.6 - HD 6850 CF @1000/1200 - Thuban 1090T @4.0GHZ - DX11
CPU-Z does not support my mobo so I included the Core-temp gadget that shows my 1090T @4GHZ.
Here is a score at 1920x1080 res with AAx4, AFx16, Extreme Tessellation. Top tier and CF/SLI configurations need these higher settings to breathe.
15th Warlock - 2663 - 105.7 - PNY GTX580 SLI @ 833/1666/1050 - Intel 2600K @ 5Ghz- DX 11
Nice rig! I was able to get my Maximus IV Extreme on March 9, it was sold out in minutes, mine was the last one sold that day, I had to call Newegg the next day to make sure I would get my board as after placing my order and refreshing the board's page it showed as "Sold Out"! Had to ask twice to the rep if I would get my board shipped. Those boards sell out in minutes! Cheers mate!
Yeah I had to call to.... just to make sure they were really there. Shortly after I bought one as well they were out. Although it wasn't as quick as it was for you. But in the past I have had their site glitch out on me. When the 5870's released.... It told me it completed my order...but it really wasn't there. That's why I didn't take any chances either.... and I also called them twice with this motherboard. Just to make sure it didn't glitch out on me again!
Awsome Board Hey man?!!! Fun as hell to play with. By far one of the better boards I have owned!
BTW This new Board and CPU is the Shit just reran this benchmark with only a Overclock on the CPU of 4.5 Ghz and a GPU increase of 40Mhz (So up to 840 Mhz) and I am already in the 90 FPS Range. Before I had my GPU clocks up to 950Mhz + and a 4.0 GHZ i7 860 to get 93 FPS.... So man O man I should have no problem breaking my goal of 100 FPS now
Apparent great efficiency in AMD GPU's
Just out of curiousity, i did some quick simple math to calculate the efficiency difference between the highest scoring AMD DX11 set-up, and the lowest scoring AMD DX11 one.
Highest score: rickss69, with a score of 3715, his GPU is a HD5970+5850 @ 950Mhz
Lowest score: Mathragh, with a score of 275, my GPU is a single mobility 5650 @ 750
Now, ricks GPU set-up has a total of 4640 stream processors, whereas mine has 400.
With rickss69's score of 3715, divided by 4640 stream processors, and divided by a clock of 950Mhz, he gets 0,000843 score per streamprocessor per Mhz.
With my score of 275, divided by 400 stream processors, and divided by a clock of 750Mhz, I get a score of 0,000917 per streamprocessor per Mhz.
Now to compare both scores, i divide ricks69's score per streamprocessor per Mhz, by mine, and multiply times a hundred to get a percentage.
(0,000843/0,000917)*100=91,94027 -> ~92%
Imho thats some serious efficiency trough all that upscaling of the core itself(the difference between the 5650 core, and the 5870 core), the inclusion of crossfire two times(between the 2 GPU's on the 5970, and between the 5970 and the 5850), and the addition of a slightyly different configured core(the 5850 in ricks69's set-up).
I guess things could be a bit off as my memory might run a bit slow compared to the core speed(I overclocked to 750/960, opposed to default clocks of 550/800), but I thought it was worth mentioning nonetheless! Also, my lower CPU clocks could potentially be of some influence, but I guess i'll never find out.
Maybe its interesting to see how all these architectures scale when they get compared to each other purely streamprocessor and clockwise, and include that information in the spreadsheet aswell. Would be awesome to analyze different set-up with eachother that way.
Edit: Also, feel free to point out any errors i've made in case I've gone horribly wrong somewhere
i'll just stick this up again for you....
wonder why you missed it?
Sorry Bout that like I said I have been busy and I did not mean to miss it. With that said... 2DividedbyZero is back on top again
20mmrain - 2466 - 97.9 - XFX HD6950 1GB Xfire - 991/1302 - i7 2600k @ 4.5 Ghz - DX 11
My New Run.... I don't think I will have a problem hitting over 100 FPS...My Max temps on bot cards (Now Water cooled) didn't even hit 42c. My Vregs on the cards only hit 59c (They are not water cooled) I believe I have allot more head room! Woo Hoo I am happy!!!
can you tell me whether my results are GOOD or there is something wrong with my performance?
Rig 5970 quadfire @ stock clock, i965 @ 4.05 Ghz
what score should i get with the system I have?
@zanat0s Well it would be better if you benched your machine the same as everyone else has here in this thread and then we can compare yours to everyone elses and tell you yes its good or bad etc.
Please go back to post 1 and read how to set up the benchmark and do it again and show us your score.
p3gaz_001| 2665 | 105.4 | EVGA GTX580 @ 980/1860/1198 | i7 975 XE @ 4.5GHz | DX9
p3gaz_001 | 2586 | 102.4 | EVGA GTX580 @ 980/1860/1198 | i7 975 XE @ 4.5GHz | DX10
p3gaz_001 | 1978 | 78.5 | EVGA GTX580 @ 980/1860/1198 | i7 975 XE @ 4.5GHz | DX11
2DividedbyZero | 3767 | 149.6 | HD5970+5850 @ 888/1250 | i7 980X @ 4.4GHz | DX11
DX10 run incoming..., oh and yeah, I'm bored. system memory tweaked and cpu upped a tad.
2DividedbyZero | 4559 | 181.0 | HD5970+5850 @ 888/1250 | i7 980X @ 4.4GHz | DX10
when we gonna see some tri-69xx scores heh?
Direct X 10
AlienIsGOD - 948 - 37.6 FPS - 4850 512MB Xfire 665/1015 - Q9450 2.66ghz - DX 10
Open GL run
AlienIsGOD - 261 - 10.3 FPS - 4850 512MB Xfire 665/1015 - Q9450 2.66ghz - Open GL
My first run @ stock clocks, yes i consider the 4850s clocks stock cause they are flashed to those values. More runs to come in the coming days
Is it normal for the HD4000's to have such a low min fps ? xvi and I seem to have very low min avgs....
get me on that list plz 20mm
rickss69 - 4364 - 173.2 - 5970/5870 @ 950/1200 - i7 2600K @ 5.0GHz - DX11
rickss69 - 4552 - 180.7 - 5970/5870 @ 950/1200 - i7 2600K @ 5.0GHz - DX10
MetalRacer - 4274 - 169.7 - 2 x 5970's @ 950/1250 - i7 980X @ 4.2GHz - DX11
MetalRacer - 4997 - 198.4 - 2 x 5970's @ 940/1200 - i7 980X @ 4.2GHz - DX10
Will be updating today.... so no worries.
Separate names with a comma.