1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Next Gen ATI vs. NVidia

Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by BloodTotal, Dec 24, 2012.

  1. BloodTotal

    BloodTotal New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    836 (0.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    48
    Location:
    Canadia
    Lets have a discussion about it!

    - Performance projections
    - Price projections
    - Price drop in current graphics cards projections
    - driver support projections
  2. magibeg

    magibeg

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,000 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    203
    Given we know next to nothing about anything, i'd call it a draw.
    AsRock says thanks.
  3. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,245 (4.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,412
    another pissing contest
    AlienIsGOD says thanks.
  4. ThE_MaD_ShOt

    ThE_MaD_ShOt

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2011
    Messages:
    4,831 (4.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,369
    Location:
    Hi! I'm from the Internet
    Somewhat close to the same performance between the two. One's going to be a tad lower in performance.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  5. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,754 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    538
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis
    Performance projections
    HD 8970 to be approx: 50% faster than HD 7970 and about 5% faster than Nvidia's equivalent.
    - Price projections
    IMO AMD will price the HD 8970 approx: 10% higher than HD 7970's original released price. NV will also rape us on price. Yes it sucks.
    - Price drop in current graphics cards projections
    HD 7900's and NV's equivalent to drop in price by about $70 on the day of launch of the new cards and then another $50 to $70 about 1-2 months after launch.
    - driver support projections
    Both AMD & NVIDIA will release modified drivers that should boost performance as much as 20% vs. The original drivers launched with the new cards.

    :D
  6. Frag Maniac

    Frag Maniac

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2010
    Messages:
    2,442 (1.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    504
    The more important discussion will be how Maxwell compares to whatever AMD offers. These next "gens" are really just more reboots of the current gen than new gens in and of themselves.
  7. Rei86 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2012
    Messages:
    172 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17
    8970 will be probably 4GB card and only 20% faster than the 7970

    The GTX790/780/770 will all be GK114 and not GK110.

    No care as Keplers are meh, and the real nVidia GPU to look out for is the Tegra boosted Maxwell.
  8. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    9,915 (6.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,197
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    its said that the GTX780 will be 15% faster then the 680, but then i read that it could have 2000+ shaders, and based on the GK114

    Kepler is meh, yet you own a few of them........
  9. Rei86 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2012
    Messages:
    172 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17
    My GTX260 was getting long in the tooth.

    And actually I own five Keplers and one Fermi ATM :rolleyes:

    Just saying the Kepler refresh won't be worth it to most and the real "Next Big Thing" will the Maxwell's.
  10. Protagonist

    Protagonist

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
    Messages:
    718 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    123
    Next year will be a year of refresh, nothing new that we haven't seen, I don't expect performance to improve by more than 5% from both camps.

    If i were AMD or Nvidia I would not bother with try something new for the refresh, I would just tweak whats there and re brand it, like they will do anyway, divert all resources to the true next gen which comes out 2014.
  11. NC37

    NC37

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,183 (0.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    264
    The downside of going to a tick-tock setup is...the tock is always so-so compared to the tick. It works fine when you have an Intel vs AMD competition where AMD is still trying to match the tick and not the tock. But GPUs...I wish they hadn't started it. Competition is much more even. All the last GPUs have done is raise prices. The 460s were real awesome deals for the price. 560s and 660s...meh. I hope one really tromps the other next gen. That will force the other to be more competitive on prices.

    AMD has been rebranding way too much. I hope to see some of the old rebrands finally getting replaced.
  12. Rei86 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2012
    Messages:
    172 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17
    hmm

    Tock's are always better than Ticks. The refinement that the Tock goes through is what makes them much better.
  13. Jack1n

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2012
    Messages:
    1,016 (1.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    225
    Location:
    Central Israel
  14. Jetster

    Jetster

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,863 (2.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,929
    Location:
    Oregon
    I dont think it matters Im justbe glad they are both in busness still. Competition is good thing
  15. Tonim89

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2012
    Messages:
    50 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    Location:
    Juiz de Fora - MG / Brazil
    I read some rumors where AMD expects to ship 40% more performance at the same power consumption in the Sea Islands series. It's not even close to the 100% increase with Tahiti over Cayman, but it's already something.

    About the prices, AMD should launch first (as ever), but i think they will not cost the same $550 at launch, since the performance jump wouldn't justify the price. I would love to see a Top-Notch Radeon released by $389, as 5870 did, but no way this is gonna happen.
  16. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,936 (7.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,509
    My projection is I will not be able to afford any of it.
  17. yogurt_21

    yogurt_21

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,384 (1.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    559
    Location:
    AZ
    ^this, also my projection is that none of it will matter and as has been the case for the past few years, the old cards will still play all the latest games at max detail.
    Wrigleyvillain says thanks.
  18. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,936 (7.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,509
    I agree. My 670 holds down Battlefield 3 and violates its man flower. Don't see any game topping those graphics anytime soon.
  19. xxriznoxx New Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2012
    Messages:
    77 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Honestly, from what i see now, i think next gen nvidia will take the cake. Right now, the 670 and the 680 was one of nvidia's big mistakes. There is literally no difference between a reference 670 and a reference 680, so with things being weird like this, nvidia will definitely learn from their mistakes and bring their cards to the top again. With the gtx 685 rumor i read (supposedly 25% faster than reference 680), it makes me think a 780 will be ridiculously powerful, or probably on equal length. (5-10% better maybe).

    ATI on the other hand, just like all their products always end up. They have a tiny bit of their fame time, and then their performance gets outdated again or either too good that no program out there fully utilizes it (8 cores -_-), but then again i AMD is packed with a lot of surprises. They just might hit nvidia with a dagger from the back again haha.
  20. EarthDog

    EarthDog

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,176 (1.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    These.
  21. Wrigleyvillain

    Wrigleyvillain PTFO or GTFO

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    7,658 (3.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,767
    Location:
    Chicago
    True...the only thing pushing me to improve upon my still-strong GTX 480 right now is wanting to upgrade to 1440P. Well, that and a somewhat cheaper power bill.
  22. Widjaja

    Widjaja

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    4,819 (1.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    636
    Location:
    Wangas, New Zealand
    If the 7xxx series driver are anything to go by, then I would expect the 7xxx series driver to improve in stability through the duration of the year that the 8xxx series cards are released and the 8xxx series cards will have driver bugs which will remain until the next year.

    Can not comment about nVidia as I have not used them in a long time.

    Either way I hope I am wrong and both 7xxx series and 8xxx series drivers work flawlessly on release.
  23. DayKnight

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2012
    Messages:
    219 (0.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13
    2013 Q2 aint far away. ;)
  24. Rei86 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2012
    Messages:
    172 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17
    EDIT Phone typing sucks.

    For me with each driver update I've found my GTX600 series cards getting worse and meh.

    However for me nvidia's track record has been great when it comes to driver updates. Not only that they add SLI profiles for even the unknown games that probably less than 100k people will play so that goes to show the support that nvidia is willing to put in. Don't now about ATI/AMD legacy support since I haven't bought an AMD/ATI card in a long time but nvidia is good about it.

    Also from all the forum members complaining and groaning something thats easy to spot is that AMD either knocks a driver out the park or its just meh. Not only that some of the complaints I've seen in the past has been slow CxF support compared to nvidia.

    As for the hardware like I already said 20% jump and thats it. No one should care about nvidia's 700 seires that much since the Maxwell is the real winner we should look out for.
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2012
  25. Aleksander

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    3,254 (1.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    304
    I personally think they are both disappointing

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page