1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NoFAN Announces Two New Fanless Cases

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Apr 9, 2012.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    27,669 (11.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,414
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Korean fanless PC company NoFAN announced two new cases, the micro-ATX CS-70, and the ATX (mid-tower) CS-80. The cases ensure they stay fanless after installation, by including fanless PSUs and CPU coolers. The cooler included is the CR-100C, which is guaranteed to fit in these cases. Both cases include a P-400A fanless PSU with 400W capacity. Measuring 235 x 487 x 284 mm (WxDxH), the CS-70 has three 3.5" drive bays, and one each of exposed 5.25", and 2.5" bays. It includes USB 3.0 front-panel ports (standard header), apart from audio ports.

    The CS-80, on the other hand, bears more conventional looks, measuring 200 x 490 x 470 mm. It has a 100% tool-free design, with three exposed 5.25" drive bays, apart from six 3.5" bays. Its front-panel includes an eSATA port apart from USB 3.0 and audio. Although both cases have provisions for fans, they obviously don't include any. Pricing and availability information is awaited.

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Source: FanlessTech
  2. Huddo93

    Huddo93 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2011
    Messages:
    299 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    57
    Location:
    Perth, WA, Australia
    Is the CS-70 meant to look so similar the Silverstone FT03? :S
  3. theJesus

    theJesus

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2008
    Messages:
    3,960 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    857
    These look really familiar; I thought they were already out. Are they just slightly updated versions?
  4. hhumas

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2011
    Messages:
    549 (0.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Location:
    Islamabad
    cpu cooler is awesome like a turbine
  5. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    27,669 (11.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,414
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    And the CS-80 looks similar to a particular case from InWin.
  6. THE_EGG

    THE_EGG

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Messages:
    1,055 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    268
    Location:
    Brisbane QLD, Australia
    so basically they take already made cases, strip the fans out and probably charge a premium of silverstone and inwin. Sounds a lot like a Porsche GT3 RS, costs more and they take everything out.
  7. theJesus

    theJesus

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2008
    Messages:
    3,960 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    857
    Don't forget the oversized cooler though.
  8. micropage7

    micropage7

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    5,273 (3.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,193
    Location:
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    its very interesting that nowadays processor could get cooled using passive cooler
  9. Darkleoco

    Darkleoco

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,592 (1.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    246
    Location:
    Cullowhee, North Carolina
  10. m1dg3t

    m1dg3t

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    2,246 (1.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    513
    Location:
    Canada
    I'd like to see a review of these with thermal imaging to show the cooling effect, or lack thereof
  11. Eternalchaos

    Eternalchaos

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    59 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12
    and overpriced, I believe the cooler costs £80+ I remember Overclock3D reviewed it last year
  12. jihadjoe

    jihadjoe

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    381 (0.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    97
    Not really. x86 processors made do without coolers from 1978 (8086) until 1993, when the first Pentiums came out. One of my first rigs was a Siemens-built 286-16 (was overclocked to 20 by changing the clock crystal). It didn't have anything remotely resembling a heatsink, and it didn't even get notably warm to the touch during operation.

    The first CPU I had that actually made use of an HSF was a Pentium 100. It had a miniscule cooler, and didn't even make use of any TIM. The tiny heatsink just sat on top of the CPU and an equally tiny fan clipped both of them onto the socket. I bet it would work fine today passively cooled using just a chipset cooler and a good adhesive thermal pad.

    x86 processors only started to need real cooling (HSF fastened tightly onto the CPU with TIM in between) with the Pentium Pro in 1995.
  13. THE_EGG

    THE_EGG

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Messages:
    1,055 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    268
    Location:
    Brisbane QLD, Australia
    again hahaha the GT3 RS analogy comes into play, bigger engine ;) I do think though it would be pretty cool (or rather warm) to have a fanless system.
  14. rpsgc

    rpsgc

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    Messages:
    695 (0.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    133
    Location:
    Portugal
    CS-70 = Silverstone Fortress 3
    CS-80 = InWin BUC

    Just replace the PSU, slap it an oversized cooler and call it your own.
  15. _JP_

    _JP_

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    2,641 (1.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    706
    Location:
    Portugal
    Those chassis still need forced convection to move the hot air. The CPU cooler is massive! :eek:
  16. Depth

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    589 (0.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    132
    Looks ok to me, hot air rises out of the mesh on top, room temperature air flows in through the bottom.
  17. Ahhzz

    Ahhzz

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,857 (0.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    473
    Think one should attach a turbine like on the top of a roof to assist the air flow :)
  18. Octavean

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    643 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    56
    I went to Costco and came across some fanless fans from Dyson. Sure it could move some air but it wasn’t silent, it wasn’t reasonably and a standard fan could do a better job (IE move more air efficiently):

    http://www.dyson.com/store/fans.asp?utm_source=MSN&utm_medium=CPC&utm_campaign=CPC

    I hope these cases don’t use the same principles. In my mind if its not cheaper and it doesn’t perform better then I don’t see the point.
  19. douglatins

    douglatins

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    2,854 (1.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    272
    Location:
    Brasil
    Fanless is stupid, less than 1000Rpm rotation with descent bearing is inaudible unless you live inside a recording studio. And could net a lot better results than no fan at all.
  20. ktr

    ktr

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    7,406 (2.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    687
    Those are not fanless. The fan is located in the base.
  21. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    11,557 (4.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,262
    wuts funny is despite fanless design, as the machine runs hotter the more power it draws.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page