1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Blames OEMs for GeForce 300 Rebranding

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Mar 5, 2010.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,546 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,644
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    NVIDIA is weeks away from unveiling its GeForce GTX 400 series, which until a few weeks ago, was expected to be the GeForce GTX 300, by the media. Expecting that nomenclature didn't need rocket science. However, NVIDIA changed it with releasing as many as a dozen and a half SKUs in the so-called GeForce 300 series based on existing GT21x GPUs, with not much fanfare. The company got a little candid with Bit-Tech.net in an interview, in admitting that pressure from OEMs forced NVIDIA to 'create' GeForce 300 series, because OEMs wanted "something new" on their specs sheets, if they were to opt for NVIDIA's mGPUs over those from AMD, which already support DirectX 11, under the Mobility Radeon HD 5000 series. Most of these rebrands, according to the company, are specific to the OEMs, and will not be released by board partners to the retail market.

    Source: Bit-Tech.net
     
  2. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,546 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,644
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Thanks to IRA_FBI for sending this in.
     
    [I.R.A]_FBi says thanks.
  3. dir_d

    dir_d

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    848 (0.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    110
    Location:
    Manteca, Ca
    So they are saying because we didnt have DX11 and ATI did our oems wanted us to create the 300 series to make it look like we can compete with the 5000 mobility DX11 cards. Thats Bull they very well could have said no thats ripping off the consumer we are not gonna do that.
     
  4. JATownes

    JATownes

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,825 (0.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    433
    When has Nvidia EVER said that? Then again, when has ANY company ever said that? Rebranding sux for everyone, but this makes it seem the OEMs were gonna go with ATI unless Nvidia renamed...why would going with ATI be so bad?
     
  5. Zubasa

    Zubasa

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,980 (1.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    457
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    Not exactly that "going Ati is bad", but nVidia claims the OEMs are saying "do something you loser."
    In proper words, the OEMs are pressureing nVidia to act, but it is not like nVidia is going to say no to rebranding. :laugh:
     
    JATownes says thanks.
  6. TVman

    TVman New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2009
    Messages:
    313 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    41
    rebranding FTL!!! first read it on tomshardware,btarunr your getting lazy:p
     
  7. JATownes

    JATownes

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,825 (0.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    433
    :laugh::roll::laugh::roll::laugh:
     
  8. DarthCyclonis New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    69 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    What a bunch of F'ing liers. REBRANDING DOES NOT HAPPEN WITHOUT NVIDIA'S CONSENT.
    Nvidia pushed OEM venders the 300 crap part becaue the OEM venders were most likley going to drop them like a brick.
     
  9. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,181 (5.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,971
    Location:
    Home
    Nice, first we have 8xxx, then we have 9xxx, then we have GT2xx and now GT3xx. Was GT1xx use the same core?
     
  10. Zubasa

    Zubasa

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,980 (1.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    457
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    Well all of the Geforce 8 are new chips back then.
    The GT 100s on the other hand are some prime rebranding examples.
     
  11. Cleorina

    Cleorina New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2010
    Messages:
    19 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Malaysia
    i don't care what Nvidia name it... as long the card far good then old card... Hahahaha
     
  12. Zubasa

    Zubasa

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,980 (1.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    457
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    Bad news for you, the 300 series are exactly the same with the last generation, and sometimes even worst. :rolleyes:
     
  13. Thrackan

    Thrackan

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Messages:
    3,482 (1.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    656
    True, nVidia's consent just got put on the table because the OEM's were pushing it.

    Forced consent is, at least in this case, still consent :D
     
  14. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,822 (3.96/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,481
    Location:
    Quantum well (UK)
    Of course they blame the OEMS. :rolleyes:
     
  15. Cleorina

    Cleorina New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2010
    Messages:
    19 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Malaysia
    I know that:roll: The new GT400 i see Nvidia go for old tech... like 8800GTS with 384-bit so that make GT500 a 448-Bit like GTX260:banghead:
     
  16. SirMango

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    110 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Isn't this not the first time Nvidia blames its OEMs? lol

    Name rebranding totally confuses me... especially for mobile GPU market as their names don't exactly fit with what's on the desktop GPU market.
     
  17. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,181 (5.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,971
    Location:
    Home
    ^ you are not supposed to game on a laptop anyway, but I agree that the naming should fit the performance of the desktop counterpart. But of course, money minded people have different ideas.
     
  18. TAViX Guest

    lol. nvidia sucks again!
     
  19. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,930 (6.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,025
    This is like blaming Peer Pressure for your addiction to crack...

    They forced me to smoke it!

    IMO, nVidia has good products, but their failure to just stand behind those products and let the products speak for themselves has done a lot of harm.

    G92 should have been the 8850 series, and GT200 should have been the 9800 series, with GT200b being the 9850 series. They should have started this GT*### naming scheme with their DX11 parts.

    But their marketting department screwed them. They were in too big of a rush to match ATi's punch with releasing the 8800GT and 8800GTS 512MB, then when ATi release their RV670 cards under a new name, nVidia started freaking out because they were still using the old names, and it looked like the ATi cards were newer.
     
    [Ion] says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  20. Sasqui

    Sasqui

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    7,639 (2.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,399
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
    Anyone seen a side-by-side spec table that shows the evolution of the models they have now? Like which card has been renamed 3-4 times to make it look new again.

    What a cluster fu*k.
     
  21. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,655 (13.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,051
    C'mon Nvidia. If your OEM's had new products to sell they probablly wouldn't of had to rebrand your old stuff to make any kind of profit off of your product. Blame OEM's, I'm sure they blame you for whatever loss they are taking.
     
  22. ToTTenTranz

    ToTTenTranz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Messages:
    865 (0.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    167
    Location:
    Porto
    LOL nVidia is now trying to be a victim of the rebranding.
     
  23. KainXS

    KainXS

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,600 (2.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    501
    Umm lets see

    heres a few

    G92
    8800GS-9600GSO(same as GS)-9600GSO512(much shower than GS)-GT330(OEM)
    8800GT-9800GT(die strink)-GTS240(OEM)-GT330(OEM)
    8800GTS512-9800GTX(new pcb same gpu)-9800GTX+(die strink)-9800GX2-GTS150(OEM)-GTS250(same as later models of GTX+)
    G94
    9600GT-9600GSO(much much slower)-GT130(OEM)
    GT21X
    G205-G210-GT220-GT240-G310(OEM)-G315(OEM)-G320(OEM)-G340(OEM)

    not talking about rebranding here just showing how they ended up

    how in the world do they blame this on the oems, what happened to the 100 series, I guess that was there fault too right, . . . . . . .lol
     
    Sasqui says thanks.
  24. Sasqui

    Sasqui

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    7,639 (2.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,399
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]


    :laugh::roll::laugh:
     
    [Ion] and [I.R.A]_FBi say thanks.
  25. [I.R.A]_FBi

    [I.R.A]_FBi New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,664 (2.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    540
    Location:
    c:\programs\kitteh.exe
    ^ bumboclaat :roll:
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page