1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Claims Upper Hand in Tessellation Performance

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Mar 19, 2010.

  1. AsRock

    AsRock TPU addict

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2007
    Messages:
    10,764 (4.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,643
    Location:
    US
    If true they beat a 6 month old card lol. I'm sure W1z will prove what the truth is and what is not :).
  2. Zubasa

    Zubasa

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,980 (1.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    457
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    So you buy a DX10 graphics card to run games in DX9, you might as well get a console and be done with it :laugh:
    You want to know why BF:BC2 does not support FSAA in DX9? Because they simply port that from the console which couldn't afford FSAA. :slap:

    DX11 actually is taking on much better than DX10, for the very lease there are games that support DX11 within the first 6 months the hardware is released.
    DX10 fell flat on its face mainly because how people hates Win Vista, and the fact that nVidia released pussy mid-range 8600GTs that can't even run DX9 games maxed out.

    The point about FarCry2 not looking much better in DX10?
    That games is base on the Dunia engine which is a modified CryEngine, and it is a DX9 engine with added DX10 support.
    The Halo 2 Engine is mainly designed for the Xbox that makes it an even worst example.
    By the way Halo 2 is released in 2004, that is way before Vista even exists. These are DX9 native games.

    Most important thing is this is a thread about the new DX11 GPU from nVidia, not some Console vs PC thread.
    Mussle's earlier post was to point out that nvidia's 3DVision has too many limitations, and that includes FPS/refresh rate issues in DX10/11 those have nothing to do with Vsync
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2010
  3. tkpenalty New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,958 (2.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Location:
    Australia, Sydney
    So what does 3D actually help with? Just eyecandy, and nothing more, its not like you need to judge distance (and you can't really). For it to even work well you'd have to keep your head still.

    However a 6 monitor setup can be wrapped around your field of vision (or 3), and lets you see more of whats going on in games. Especially more useful in racing games, where in a normal 16:9 ratio, you'd rely on a button to check who's beside you, whereas in a multiple monitor setup you could just duck your eye to the side quickly without being distracted by the button.

    The difference is that multiple monitors actually facilitate gaming, whilst 3D doesn't do anything but create an illusion.

    You may find your 23 inch screen big enough but others who want more than just eye candy would object.
  4. CyberCT New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    Messages:
    47 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Did you read that I have XP? I only have DX9 on my PC, which is perfectly fine. Even though I have an X360 Id much rather have my games running at 60fps at 1080p than 30fps at 720p. To each their own.

    Well, like you also said, to each their own. I see absolutely no reason for a 3 (let alone 6) monitor setup for gaming. Maybe for day trading stocks, but nothing else. I couldn't care less if I either turn my eyes left or right to see a car on my side, or to quickly press a buton to see the same thing on my single monitor. And it would be more than a grand to get a 6 monitor setup (worthless for anything other than PC eye candy) with a very thin bezel, how much power would they consume alltogether, and would it run at 60fps on the same setup as a single monitor? I find it strage you say you have a hard time doing 3D in DX10/11 because Nvidia has native support for stereo 3D in Vista or Windows 7 only (DX9/DX10/11 only not XP), and the reviews say it works great. I have to use D3D drivers or IZ3D drivers for stereoscopic 3D, both of which work fine for me. You can call 3D a gimmick, but I call 6 monitors a gimmick, especially since there are thick bezels in between monitors. If the bezels were .01" thick, then maybe I could agree with you. I've seen youtube videos (and even at Bestbuy as a console setup) of a 6 monitor setup and it looks retarded. Like looking through a paned window:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6jYycRmWz4

    3D, however, looks amazing as everything jumps out at you. I don't play like that daily. Just once in a while to get a treat or to show it off. An ultra highrez monitor shrunk to 23" that supports 2560 x 1600 would be awesome cause there would be no need for FSAA. Until then, a 56" DLP would probably take up more real estate as a 6 monitor setup, consume less power, and be cheaper. It could also be used as a regular TV, monitor, and have no thick bezels inbetween. It could also do 3D if I please.

    But whatever, to each their own.
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2010
  5. tkpenalty New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,958 (2.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Location:
    Australia, Sydney
    Bezels aren't really a problem because in the end you see like literally 4000% more? Its like saying that windows on the side of a car are useless because theres the roof support structures on either side...

    imo its useless in FPS games though.

    Anyway back on OT.
    Roph says thanks.
  6. jmcslob

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,890 (1.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    454
    Location:
    Internet Heaven
    nice Title..
    I hope it's proven correct when these cards are released and at a competitive price..

    ok gonna go ride my unicorn across the river of chocolate now...
  7. the_wolf88

    the_wolf88 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    34 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Location:
    Bahrain
    I don't believe in a benchmark from Nvidia !!

    We need to see reviews from other sources not from Nvidia !!

    Of course Nvidia will show it is winning in their benchmarks even if they are losing to ATI..

    Anyway 6 days to go and we'll see who is the KING OF HELL !!
  8. rizla1

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Messages:
    482 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    Location:
    ireland
    Who in the world uses 6 monitors for gaming other than the few super rich? :wtf: and for desktop 2 is enough is it not?
  9. Zubasa

    Zubasa

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,980 (1.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    457
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    Yes I did read you have XP, just because you are running on XP does not mean the issue can be ignored.

    Newer games are developed with DX10 and 11 in mind, just because you don't care about quality doesn't mean quality does not matter.
    There is a increase in quality from DX9 to DX10 and also to DX11 (with tessellation which is the topic), but significant or not is your opinion.
    The point of whole nVidia's "3D Vision" is also to in a way increase quality "to the eye", if you don't care about that why bother posting?

    Eyefinity (the "stupid multi-monitior gaming" as you put it) on the other hand is a pretty much fail safe feature.
    It does not require a high refresh-rate monitor, ultra high-end hardware or expensive shutter glasses.

    I think I have gone off-topic far enough, I will leave it here.
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2010
  10. temp02 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2009
    Messages:
    493 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    166
    Just one question, did they use different versions of a software to compare different hardware like the benchmark result "released" the other day (were nVidia used a custom yet to be released to public version of Heaven Benchmark, v1.1) or is this an "OK" result where they did both benchmarks (on both cards, on the same day) using the same version of the software?
  11. Zubasa

    Zubasa

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,980 (1.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    457
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    From the way it looks it is still the same "yesteryear" graph.
  12. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,020 (11.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,406
    honestly, i shouldnt have said the talking out your arse part. typing out your arse would have made more sense - apologies on being rude, regardless.
  13. Black Panther

    Black Panther Senior Moderator™ Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2007
    Messages:
    8,561 (3.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,916
    If this card runs slightly better than the 5870 but results to be much more expensive (as has always been the norm for Nvidia), then one would be better off buying a 5970 I guess.
    shevanel says thanks.
  14. simlariver New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2007
    Messages:
    91 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6
    it's not only for gaming, having multiple monitors for visualization, remote management, cad design, movie editing, security, etc... Is definitely a plus.
  15. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,020 (11.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,406
    my brother works as a security guard where they use some ridiculously expensive hardware to get multi monitor for the banks of security cameras - a single eyefinity 5/6 card would solve all their issues.
  16. locoty New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    61 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4
    3D, i enjoy it only in movie, not games

    multi monitor?Eyefinity? if it's not good, why nvidia copy it? why they bother to release Nvidia Surround

    Someday, Samsung, LG, Dell or other LCD maker will release a monitor which its bezel can be taken off for the purpose of multi monitor

    FERMI will be out next week, and i think ATI prepare 5890 to counter it, that's why ATI prohibited its partner to release some high-clocking 5870, because it is served for 5890
  17. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,020 (11.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,406
    i'm expecting that within a year or two actually, or at the very least a very thin bezel on the sides. Until eyefinity, there was no real market to bother doing it for.
  18. runnin17

    runnin17 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2009
    Messages:
    386 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    35
    Welcome to the wonderful world of nVidia marketing. They know that their card won't offer any true performance gains for the price and power draw so they are relying on the nVidia fanboys to do all the buying and recommending of the card to others for them.

    nVidia = fail.

    I do hope the card is not a complete bust though, b/c I want some price wars.

    PRICE WARS = Crossfire or ever Tri-fire 5870's for me :rockout::rockout::rockout::rockout:
  19. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,162 (5.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,961
    Location:
    Home
    Its obviously Kratos.
    Easo and Roph say thanks.
  20. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,727 (6.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,869
    I've never bought a part based on the aim of a certainly amount of performance, and I don't think many others do either. I always buy the best part the budget can afford.

    Comparing overclocked results to stock results in discussions like this always makes the person look silly.
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  21. jmcslob

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,890 (1.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    454
    Location:
    Internet Heaven
    and on that note every Benchmark I see using ANY OC's gets instantly dismissed by me
    which just so happens to be about 90% of benchmarks on the web..That is unless it's showing the difference between stock and a OC
  22. Imsochobo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    514 (0.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    35
    Location:
    I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.

    Update to win7 and see that you get DX11 75fps 1080 P instead of DX9 60 fps 1080P

    Its true ;)
  23. phanbuey

    phanbuey

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,201 (2.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    973
    Location:
    Miami
    no its not. because he gets 60 fps whether he gets 60fps or 150000fps, he picked that number because he knows what he's talking about. Alot of consoles render 30 because they cant render the whole 60.
  24. Valdez

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    294 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    Szekszárd, Hungary
    [​IMG]
    Mussels says thanks.
  25. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,020 (11.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,406
    far cry 2 shows up an awful lot there... its not even DX11 (and its an nvidia sponsored game, regardless)

    the performance gains just arent very high, considering how much more powe this card uses at load.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page