1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Forces EVGA to Pull EVBot Support from GTX 680 Classified

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Oct 3, 2012.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,553 (11.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,644
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    According to an Overclockers.com report, NVIDIA forced EVGA to remove voltage control, more specifically, support for its EVBot accessory, on its GeForce GTX 680 Classified graphics card. EVBot, apart from realtime monitoring, gives users the ability to fine-tune voltages, a feature NVIDIA doesn't want users access to. This design change was communicated by EVGA's Jacob Freeman, in response to a forum question a users who found his new GTX 680 Classified card to lack the EVBot header.

    "Unfortunately newer 680 Classified cards will not come with the EVBot feature. If any questions or concerns please contact us directly so we can offer a solution," said Freeman. Hinting that NVIDIA is behind the design change, he said "Unfortunately we are not permitted to include this feature any longer," later adding "It was removed in order to 100% comply with NVIDIA guidelines for selling GeForce GTX products, no voltage control is allowed, even via external device." To make matters worse, Freeman said that EVGA has no immediate plans to cut prices of the GTX 680 Classified.

    [​IMG]

    Source: Overclockers.com
     
    Ikaruga and cadaveca say thanks.
  2. [H]@RD5TUFF

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    5,615 (3.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,707
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    The fuck .. . .. WHY!?!?!?!?
     
  3. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    What a crock of shit :shadedshu
     
  4. DannibusX

    DannibusX

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,528 (1.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    979
    Location:
    United States
    Damn.

    Sucks that you aren't allowed to modify something that you paid hundreds of dollars for.
     
  5. hardcore_gamer

    hardcore_gamer

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    387 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    172
    Location:
    Fabry Perot cavity,AlGaAs-GaAs Heterojunction
    Just like Apple:banghead:
     
  6. [H]@RD5TUFF

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    5,615 (3.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,707
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Absolute horse shit, I expect a full refund for my card and EV bot!!!!
     
  7. Maban

    Maban

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,414 (1.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,031
    Quick, somebody post a lolwut meme!
     
  8. NeoXF

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Messages:
    615 (0.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    80
    XFX leaving nVidia-like fiasco in 3... 2... 1...
     
  9. Maban

    Maban

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,414 (1.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,031
    I would think that EVGA is big enough to stand up to them.
     
  10. TheLostSwede

    TheLostSwede

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    932 (0.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    164
    In related news, Asus wasn't allowed to make their dual GPU MARS card either, as Nvidia wouldn't let them...
    So apparently the chip makers are now controlling what their "partners" are allowed to do, or not to do with the chips they buy from them.
    This industry is clearly going down the toilet, as the manufacturers don't have the balls to stand up to the chip makers. :shadedshu
     
  11. hardcore_gamer

    hardcore_gamer

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    387 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    172
    Location:
    Fabry Perot cavity,AlGaAs-GaAs Heterojunction
    May be nVidia is thinking of releasing K series GPUs and charge us extra for tweakability like Intel does.
     
  12. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,445 (4.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,474
    I see EVGA launching an AMD lineup that are fully balls to wall
     
    remixedcat says thanks.
  13. buggalugs

    buggalugs

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    935 (0.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    143
    Location:
    Australia
    not surprised. Nvidia has a long reputation of strong arm tactics.

    In a way, I dont blame them though, if they're getting a lot of returned cards that have been killed by too much voltage, they have to do something. Too many guys like to play the overclocking game with no real understanding of what they're doing and bump the voltage to dangerous levels for 24/7 use.
     
    sanadanosa, [Ion], the54thvoid and 2 others say thanks.
  14. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,445 (4.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,474
    same with flashing, but you see cards with dual bios on them now
     
  15. HammerON

    HammerON The Watchful Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,491 (3.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,593
    Horse pucky:(
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  16. Sinzia

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    840 (0.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    205
    Do not like.
     
  17. buggalugs

    buggalugs

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    935 (0.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    143
    Location:
    Australia
    Ya, but at least with flashing it can be repaired, a GPU killed with voltage is well and truly dead.
     
  18. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,445 (4.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,474
    i know that. AMD seems to give more leeway now
     
  19. SIGSEGV

    SIGSEGV

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    507 (0.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    107
    i smell something fishy
     
  20. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,445 (4.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,474
    yup and its puke green
     
    SQr and Aquinus say thanks.
  21. remixedcat

    remixedcat

    Joined:
    May 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,804 (1.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    602
    the hell nvidia? why? makes me worry about other things....
     
  22. HammerON

    HammerON The Watchful Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,491 (3.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,593
    Control freaks:shadedshu
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  23. Benetanegia

    Benetanegia New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,683 (1.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    694
    Location:
    Reaching your left retina.
    Do you have a proof link or something? It seems to me that the only reason they didn't release it is that a GK104 based MARS is simply redundant as GTX 690 is already based on the full chip and clocked like the GTX680. Afaik Asus told TPU that the card was never meant to release:

    http://www.techpowerup.com/171202/ASUS-ROG-MARS-III-Dual-GTX-680-PCB-Pictured.html
     
    Recus and the54thvoid say thanks.
  24. Animalpak

    Animalpak

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,099 (0.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    567
    Exactly and to speak of the guarantees vary widely ... Further problems of a different nature would create a big mess for both partners and nvidia
     
  25. bogami

    bogami

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2012
    Messages:
    256 (0.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Location:
    Slovenia
    WTF : No voltage control ?First they throw you brick in a face three slot fat and you shouldn't over clock with voltage regulator help!Yah so they will sell as overclocked cards for abnormal price!
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page