1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Forces EVGA to Pull EVBot Support from GTX 680 Classified

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Oct 3, 2012.

  1. Benetanegia

    Benetanegia New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,683 (1.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    694
    Location:
    Reaching your left retina.
    I don't think it's a big loss anyway. I lost interest in OCing a long time ago*. The reasons are that 1) it became too easy 2) it is allowed 3) it involves less and less risks every generation.

    That's not OCing. To me OC only really made sense when it was something a few select people were capable or brave enough to perform. When it meant going against the norm and when it meant a performance advantage to those few brave enough to perform a hard mod or use a bios coming from from forum member in an "obscure" website.

    Now OC is widespread, it's allowed and encouraged by the vendors themselves, it's even covered by warranty and you are given full control over every single thing related to OCing your PC. What's the point, use the tools and you'll achieve the same results as the rest of the world (with slight differences based on luck) and if it all comes down to that, is this really such a loss? Not in my eyes, but maybe I'm alone.

    * I still OC to safe 24/7 clocks but don't do it for fun or to find the limits, etc. Just simple practical OCing now.
     
  2. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,442 (1.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,662
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    The Kepler design is pretty well tied to it's strict clock/voltage manipulation to achieve the clock boosts it gets. As the dynamic clocks are hardware related it would be very hard to safely allow voltage adjustments.

    I think Nvidia have the card as fast as it can go on the set up it is on. More volts may well fry the thing and they don't want that bad PR (and I don't blame them).

    Also, as Ben says, the 690 decimated any partners chance of making a viable dual 680 card.

    It's not like Apple though. This Kepler voltage situation is being controlled to stop damage being done to hardware that's already pushing the boat out.

    I say Nvidia are looking after us this time (well not me, I'm with red).
     
  3. 20mmrain

    20mmrain

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,774 (1.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    826
    Location:
    Midwest USA
    Alright This sucks..... Time to switch back to AMD/ATI next round...... there goes another $2000 Dollar purchase from me you won't get Nvidia. (Especially if this rule carriers over to the next gen)

    Also for those who say it is not as dangerous anymore..... Well maybe you are not trying to overclock as high as you can to make it dangerous. Just because cards are able to reach higher clocks before it is considered dangerous..... doesn't mean that it is not dangerous anymore.
    As for the fail safe features that protect a product from a bad overclock..... I think that this is a good feature..... and like I said there comes a point in time anyway when you push a product so High that even fail safe features won't protect you any longer.
     
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2012
    hardcore_gamer says thanks.
  4. tacosRcool

    tacosRcool

    Joined:
    May 14, 2012
    Messages:
    860 (0.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    71
    That is so lame!
     
  5. hardcore_gamer

    hardcore_gamer

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    388 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    174
    Location:
    Fabry Perot cavity,AlGaAs-GaAs Heterojunction
    This is not "protecting". This is dumbing down. Overclockers were here for a long time. Why didn't they introduce this "feature" when people started to damage 6600GTs by overclocking in the past? I see this as a move to take away tweakability from the hardware.
     
  6. Recus

    Recus

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    530 (0.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    183
  7. Bjorn_Of_Iceland

    Bjorn_Of_Iceland

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,175 (1.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    376
    because nvidia loves money.
     
  8. hardcore_gamer

    hardcore_gamer

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    388 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    174
    Location:
    Fabry Perot cavity,AlGaAs-GaAs Heterojunction
    Yes, fanboys will never learn. They always try to justify a company even if they take away some important feature from the users.

    Enthusiasts and most people who value their money overclock their GPU to get the maximum performance out of it. It is very important in high end cards like 680.

    Intel took away the overclocking feature and people still pay the premium for K series. But things are different here in GPU arena where both players are very close in performance.
     
  9. BigMack70

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2012
    Messages:
    506 (0.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    114
    The GTX 6xx series cards have always been a giant "F U" to consumers...

    They couldn't deliver on GK110 and instead sold a $300 chip at a $500 price point, they complicated overclocking with their "GPU Boost" nonsense, and they screwed enthusiasts by not allowing voltage tuning on any of their cards.

    I feel bad for uninformed folks who bought something like the Classified or the MSI Lightning 680.

    I generally like Nvidia's cards, but the GTX 6xx series is a load of crap and a huge step backwards from the GTX 5xx series IMO.
     
  10. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,367 (5.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,677
    Location:
    Florida
    knowing EVGA though in future releases they will probably do something like MSI and provide voltage read pads and pads you can attach trim pots too.

    sneaky sneaky.
     
  11. TheLostSwede

    TheLostSwede

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    933 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    164

    Not as such, but I spoke to a friend of mine at Asus at MOA of all things who told me this. I'm pretty sure he knows what he's talking about, but of course the official excuse would be something that doesn't make Nvidia look bad...
     
  12. 3870x2

    3870x2

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Messages:
    4,875 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    689
    Location:
    Joplin, Mo
    There might be a reason other than money and control that NV is doing this.
     
  13. [H]@RD5TUFF

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    5,615 (3.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,707
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    This really pisses me off, but it's not like AMD is a real alternative with the shittiest drivers in history.
     
  14. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,506 (4.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,357
    this has always been the case.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  15. hv43082

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,466 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    95
    Location:
    Orange County, CA and Miami, FL
    Wow the pro AMD people are all over this thread like flies over poop!
     
  16. Dj-ElectriC

    Dj-ElectriC

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,234 (1.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    846
    Becuase of Nvidia my Lightning 680s can't overvolt pass 1.175v

    This is Bullshit
     
    eidairaman1 says thanks.
  17. alwayssts

    alwayssts

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Messages:
    378 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    You want unbiased? I'll flame them all. Ready?

    Go.


    You sir, hit a raw nerve and said a lot of important things that people really need to understand. From a guy that grew up with the ABIT boards that started the initial craze, it really does make me sad. The reality is, as you know, and many people don't seem to understand is that overclocking for all intents and purposes is dead and dying...killed by wanting to spur upgrades. Every major player is guilty.

    Remember when AMD and nvidia over the course of a couple generations started limiting TDP per product for segmentation and sold it as a feature? Remember then when they started doing set voltages and turbo modes (which in the case of 7900 for example actually makes it a WORSE over-all product they sell for more money)? Remember when Intel essentially made a product that doesn't really work worth a damn over the typical best perf/clock ratio of ~1.175 volts (Ivy Bridge)?

    As you infer by stating 'everyone gets the same results', the diluted form of overclocking we have today is more of a product feature to allow for lower and looser binning, skimp on the BOM on lower-end skus, and is built into an inflated price on upper-end ones...exactly the opposite of the initial market and purpose. I was fine with the advent of software voltage control (that took advantage of clock/voltage potential of a process with realistic cooling) versus soldering to change the properties of a resistor...less release of the magic smoke that way. What pisses me off are things like strict conformance to the pci-e (etc) power specs, or even more bullshit, limiting tdps below them. Not doing the later, for instance, saved GF104/110 from being a colossal failure and made the products quite appealing. If you want proof, look at the stock tdp and power consumption of those products, how many pci-e connectors they had, how well they clocked...and power consumption after overclocking. Now that kepler doesn't suck...gone.

    Another example,

    AMD knows if you buy a 7870, you are likely going to run it at ~1200+mhz...the max the chip will do limited by process tech, not tdp.
    They also know if you'd like to buy a 7850 and get 7870 performance, so they institute tdp restrictions (130w) and bios locks (1050mhz) to limit the average clock to under the performance of the formers stock ability (7850 @ 1075mhz ~ 7870 @ 1ghz). That way the bottom-line price difference is preserved while the upper sku still appears worthy at stock.

    Even worse is when you can smell WHY they do these things on the grand scale. In this case it's obvious 8000 will have 150w/225w max tdp parts (7850 is 130w, 7950 200w...10% less used logic and ~20% less tdp than 70 skus...).

    Why would anyone buy a 150w part that outperforms a stock 7870 by 10% if 7850 already could a year earlier for the same price? They wouldn't. Now they can sell it as a huge efficiency improvement (more shaders than 7870 at lower initial clock and overclocking potential granting a net gain in terms but not actual power consumption beyond scant used transistors for CU difference), which again...is bullshit. While obviously GK104 is well-designed, no doubt it's tdp, just like 7950 and 8950, is built so GTX770 will look justifiably better at 225w, again more units at a lower sweet clock/voltage spot.

    In short...it's all a big fucking ruse. Any average Joe that thinks they are an overclocker anymore is either lying to themselves or extremely delusional.
     
    eidairaman1 and HumanSmoke say thanks.
  18. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,099 (4.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,282
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Really, I think the complaining about it is just as stupid though, since "overclockers" wanted OCing to go mainstream, pushed marketing reps, and then it happened. And now that it's happened, everyone wants things back the way they were, since companies have taken steps to ensure that them offering these features doesn't bankrupt them.


    So, ya got what ya wanted, but didn't consider the consequences....



    Now, I am not directing this at anyone specifically, this is just my general feeling. But then, when I try to tell people how to OC, to get a bit extra, they were doing something COMPLETELY different.


    OC is not dead. It's just more cleverly hidden. If you don't own a sodlering iron, and you think you're an overclocker, you're sorely mistaken. You still need that iron.

    Perfecdt example..all the claims of IVB running hot...no, actually it doesn't. you just failed to give proper cooling. :laugh:
     
    MxPhenom 216 says thanks.
  19. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,133 (6.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,194
    Well after the last generation with idiots pushing 1.2v+ though 4 Phase cards, then bashing nVidia when the VRMs popped, I could see why nVidia wants to now limit voltage control...

    Obviously the strategy of allowing people free voltage control, even if maxing the slider out will likely kill the card, didn't work, because idiots will just max the slider out then bitch when the card pops. So now we have nVidia limiting voltages again. Thank the idiots that bitched when they overvolted the cards too high and bitched.
     
    MxPhenom 216 says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  20. linoliveira

    linoliveira

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Messages:
    126 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Location:
    Portugal
    The cards are made to run at the stock voltage and frequencies, so if you push 0.001v and 1MHz more you shoul brick the warranty of the product, so you don't get a replacement straight away. am I wrong?
    I never refunded a card for OCing it because I never overvolt it badly, but this is my understanding of it.
    IF I am correct, why bother with voltage tweaking, just let ppl fry cards and put them in the market for more! :laugh:
     
  21. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    10,132 (6.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,322
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    I was just about to say that....
     
  22. Jstn7477

    Jstn7477

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,921 (2.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,600
    Location:
    Sarasota, Florida, USA
    I must say the same with all the people still wanting to unlock HD 6950s long after their release, as if the cards now are exactly the same as the ones that originally unlocked. I'm tired of people bricking their cards and not even trying to back up the original BIOS, then they come on here and cry because they think upgrading a video card's BIOS is always necessary and yields hidden performance improvements or something in all cases. :banghead:
     
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  23. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,194 (7.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,711
    Everyone is always quick to bash without looking at the reasons why someone did something. I would like to know the reasoning behind the removal instead of assuming it was out of "greed".....and if it was greed NVIDIA is well within its right. They designed the chip. They make the drivers. Its their property. EVGA is just a mfg plant making money off NVIDIA's coat tails.

    But again we don't know WHY NVIDIA asked EVGA to remove it. Might be for safety reasons. Who knows.
     
  24. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,506 (4.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,357
    i see a lot of people (not just on TPU) criticize business decisions by amd,intel,nvidia, whomever.

    most of these people sit around and contribute NOTHING to society. what gives them the right to be critical of anybody?? boggles my mind...
     
    MxPhenom 216 says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  25. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,194 (7.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,711
    Common sense is not so common anymore. :toast:
     
    MxPhenom 216 says thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page