1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Forces EVGA to Pull EVBot Support from GTX 680 Classified

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Oct 3, 2012.

  1. EarthDog

    EarthDog

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,922 (2.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    983
    Not sure... its wired for it, and the evbot works on its own not off the card (has its own FW, not associated with the GPU - you update FW on the evbot via the motherboard, not the GPU).

    I would GUESS, yes.
     
  2. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    You mean the modified bios?

    Also it is AIBs fault in part, cause they promised what they couldn't deliver.
     
  3. Benetanegia

    Benetanegia New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,683 (1.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    694
    Location:
    Reaching your left retina.
    http://www.brightsideofnews.com/new...proving-quality-or-strangling-innovation.aspx

    I don't know if this is 100% true, but if true it looks very reasonable to me. It paints quite a different picture than what it's been, for the most part, assumed in this thread and other forums. For instance, Nvidia wouldn't be forcing anything. I do understand, that maybe before now they'd get the warranty from Nvidia no matter what, but personally I see no reason for Nvidia offering a warranty if their specs are not met. From manufacturer's perspective not getting the warranty might be scary enough that it really forces them to the only option, but it's not like Nvidia is aiming a gun to their heads.

    I think that when Jacob Freeman said "It was removed in order to 100% comply with NVIDIA guidelines for selling GeForce GTX products" he might actually be like saying "If we want to get the warranty...".
     
  4. Hilux SSRG

    Hilux SSRG

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    1,023 (1.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    170
    Location:
    New Jersey, USA
    Sucks for persons who bought the "Classified" model card from Evga who were interested in it's feature-set and willing to pay top dollar.
     
  5. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    Indeed, the only way to get voltage control is to flash a 680 Lightning with the old BIOS or hotwire with an Asus card and Motherboard.
     
  6. m1dg3t

    m1dg3t

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    2,247 (1.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    513
    Location:
    Canada
    Hate to say I told ya so...

    :eek:
     
  7. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,537 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    547
    Sounds reasonable. MSI look like they've been playing fast and loose with specification, and there is no way that the anti-Nvidia crowd or casual tech reader/Googling card upgrader is going to parse the information solely as being about MSI. The inference will be- especially on forum threads- that Nvidia is producing an inferior/unstable product. Once the affected users start and trolls start bombing the Newegg reviews and the like, you'll end up with a PR problem out of proportion with the situation. Remember when EVGA recalled a batch of GTX 680 SuperClocked cards? It took about five minutes before some forums managed to spin that into "the GTX 680 as a design is borked"
     
  8. Benetanegia

    Benetanegia New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,683 (1.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    694
    Location:
    Reaching your left retina.
    Reading about this topic on another forum I came across this:

    http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/MSI-GTX-660-670-overvolting-PowerEdition,news-40278.html

    edit: lol it's the same posted by Humansmoke (kinda)

    I think there's much more to the voltage story than we can know by just looking at a single source.

    Right now, to me the whole thing just looks like the kids have been misbehaving and toying with things they shouldn't have and now daddy is angry.
     
  9. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    13,687 (5.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,874
    that right there i agree with, people taking a Intel SB or IVB up to 4.5GHz isnt anything special anymore.
     
  10. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    10,225 (6.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,392
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Like Erocker said, this is bullshit for people who bought eitherh te MSI lightning or Evga Classified card with Voltage tweaking in mind. BUt on the other hand, I can see why Nvidia is doing this. So that people whop buy these cards thinking they know what they are doing won't throw voltages at the cards and grenade them, like so many of the GTX570s did, which is why the power limit and voltage limit was on those cards in the first place.
     
  11. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    13,687 (5.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,874
    well a price slash should be due then cuz technically youre paying for their software too
     
  12. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    10,225 (6.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,392
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    [​IMG]
     
    eidairaman1 says thanks.
  13. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
  14. m1dg3t

    m1dg3t

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    2,247 (1.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    513
    Location:
    Canada
    I'm going to start patenting the shit I say! It's starting to become contagious now lol Imitation is the greatest form of flattery they say.

    Thank you all! You know who you are :)

    :toast:
     
  15. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    13,687 (5.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,874
    MxPhenom 216 says thanks.
  16. HossHuge

    HossHuge

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    2,078 (0.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    520
    Location:
    EDM, AB, CAN
    I'm not sure what version of Trixx you're using brandonwh64, but every one I've ever used goes to 1.3.

    [​IMG]
     
  17. xBruce88x

    xBruce88x

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,460 (1.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    646
    Don't worry guys... Freeman will just whack nVidia with his crowbar and save the day!

    seriously though... this is a bad move on nVidia's part.
     
    remixedcat and eidairaman1 say thanks.
    More than 25k PPD
  18. EarthDog

    EarthDog

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,922 (2.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    983
  19. brandonwh64

    brandonwh64 Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,781 (9.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,239
    Location:
    Chatsworth, GA
    I was about to say the EXACT same thing. Hoss nvidia's bios limits are set to 1.175 or SOMETIMES 1.2V but The bot made you go above that.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  20. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,414 (1.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    573
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    not very fair or reasonable imho(by nvidia or Evga), patrons should be repaid the premium they payed on these cards at least.
     
  21. Benetanegia

    Benetanegia New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,683 (1.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    694
    Location:
    Reaching your left retina.
    I mean it's reasonable for Nvidia to impose those conditions. Either you respect the specs or you lose warranty. If you buy a phone and use it as a frisbee, and it breaks you don't expect the warranty to cover it, do you?

    MSI put a part speced with a maximum operating voltage of 5v, way up to 8v, why is Nvdia supposed to cover that graphics card with a warranty?

    EVGA is not as bad, or maybe it is, since they are allowing users (even idiots) to use whatever voltage they want, way higher than the maximum safe voltage specified by Nvidia. It's EVGA who has to take responsabilty if it breaks, not Nvidia. That's why specifications are set in the first place.

    Nvidia just said, "we quit covering parts that do not meet our specifications, if you want to go beyond that, you are on your own", MSI and EVGA simply prefered to get the warranty. It's all their fault.

    EDIT: Of course EVGA should keep the feature and suck it up if they get a very high return rate. Problem is they probably know full well they'd end up having big loses. All the related stories makes me think that Nvidia was covering those faulty chips until now, which is unthinkable in any industry that I know off. Anywhere if you push something beyond the specifications you're SOL.
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2012
  22. Xzibit

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,137 (1.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    260
    I think Nvidia has every right to do product control.

    The way its doing it or atleast the info that is being reported on is bad.

    If project greenlight was established as a product quality control for AIB designs. Common sense would make you beleive all designs go through Nvidia. So they had to approve the desing at some point as per the BSN report.

    So what changed ?

    Did Nvidia strong arm the MSI and EVGA to change those designs or suffer ?

    Reasonable thing to do if they were approved by Nvidia at somepoint just to phase them out. They were advertise and sold as such and if approved Nvidia and AIB should suffer the RMAs but Nvidia shouldn't strong arm to drop "card x" or AIB to risk warranties on all others cards.
     
  23. Benetanegia

    Benetanegia New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,683 (1.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    694
    Location:
    Reaching your left retina.
    From what I read they don't risk losing warranties on other cards, only the ones affected.

    And the cards are still approved. Greenlight seems to be about what AIBs can do, not about what is covered by Nvidia's own warranty. They are and have always been free to create such products, they still are, but Nvidia doesn't cover the warranty. And they shouldn't, why should they cover warranties of products that exceed their safety limits? Overvolting is allowed and covered by warranty, up to a point, extreme overvolting is not covered. Makes 100% sense.

    What it doesn't make any sense is that it's implied that before now, Nvidia actually covered designs that went beyond their specifications and limits. At least to me, that's competely unheard off in any industry and if AMD is doing that too, they better change that model since it's not reasonable, nor fair for them. Nvidia has typically offered more extreme OC cards and maybe that's why tho.
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2012
  24. EarthDog

    EarthDog

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,922 (2.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    983
    then perhaps its time for the AIB's to step up and drop the crutches... I dont mind paying more of a premium for such cards (being an 'extreme' overclocker). I can see why most wouldnt want to pay for that, but most, that know anything, wouldnt be buying such a card for 'ambient' overclocking in the first place. There will always be people 'not in the know' that buy a Lightning or a Matrix just for ambient use so AIB's get the best of both worlds that way.
     
    NeoXF says thanks.
  25. HossHuge

    HossHuge

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    2,078 (0.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    520
    Location:
    EDM, AB, CAN
    MM mentioned Trixx, so that's what I thought you were talking about.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page