1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Kepler Yields Lower Than Expected.

Discussion in 'News' started by TheMailMan78, Feb 16, 2012.

  1. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,151 (7.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,678
    NVIDIA seems to be playing the blame game according to a article over at Xbit. This is what they had to say, "Chief executive officer of NVIDIA Corp. said that besides continuously increasing capital expenditures that the company ran into in the recent months will be accompanied by lower than expected gross margins in the forthcoming quarter. The company blames low yields of the next-generation code-named Kepler graphics chips that are made at TSMC’s 28nm node. “Decline [of gross margin] in Q1 is expected to be due to the hard disk drive shortage continuing, as well as a shortage of 28nm wafers. We are ramping our Kepler generation very hard, and we could use more wafers. The gross margin decline is contributed almost entirely to the yields of 28nm being lower than expected. That is, I guess, unsurprising at this point,” said Jen-Hsun Huang, chief executive officer of NVIDIA, during a conference call with financial analysts.

    NVIDIA’s operating expenses have been increasing for about a year now: from $329.6 million in Q1 FY2012 to $367.7 million in Q4 FY2012 and expects OpEx to be around $383 million in the ongoing Q1 FY2013. At the same time, the company expects its gross margins in Q1 FY2013 to decline below 50% for the first time in many quarters to 49.2%. Nvidia has very high expectations for its Kepler generation of graphics processing units (GPUs). The company claims that it had signed contracts to supply mobile versions of GeForce “Kepler” chips with every single PC OEM in the world. In fact, NVIDIA says Kepler is the best graphics processor ever designed by the company. [With Kepler, we] won design wins at virtually every single PC OEM in the world. So, this is probably the best GPU we have ever built and the performance and power efficiency is surely the best that we have ever created,” said Mr. Huang.

    Unfortunately for NVIDIA, yields of Kepler are lower than the company originally anticipated and therefore their costs are high. Chief exec of NVIDIA remains optimistic and claims that the situation with Fermi ramp up was ever worse than that. “We use wafer-based pricing now, when the yield is lower, our cost is higher. We have transitioned to a wafer-based pricing for some time and our expectation, of course, is that the yields will improve as they have in the previous generation nodes, and as the yields improve, our output would increase and our costs will decline,” stated the head of NVIDIA.

    Kepler is NVIDIA's next-generation graphics processor architecture that is projected to bring considerable performance improvements and will likely make the GPU more flexible in terms of programmability, which will speed up development of applications that take advantage of GPGPU (general purpose processing on GPU) technologies. Some of the technologies that NVIDIA promised to introduce in Kepler and Maxwell (the architecture that will succeed Kepler) include virtual memory space (which will allow CPUs and GPUs to use the "unified" virtual memory), pre-emption, enhance the ability of GPU to autonomously process the data without the help of CPU and so on. Entry-level chips may not get all the features that Kepler architecture will have to offer."

    Source: Xbit Laboratories
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2012
  2. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,151 (7.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,678
    On a side note this explains why the new AMD GPU's are so damn expensive. Also thanks for the heads up Crap Daddy!
     
  3. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,557 (1.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    952
    So are we going to get stuck with 28nm as long as we were stuck with 40nm? With this much going into it and the transition being so costly I doubt anyone will be eager to move on to the next process.
     
  4. jpierce55

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,335 (0.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    91
    I imagine we will be, it may have been better to wait another generation before moving on as it is. This news is not surprising to me. Nvidia has been doing good financially, so I expected it was external.
     
  5. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,748 (1.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,049
    All this time we were blaming AMD how greedy they are with the 7900 series. I'm really starting to think those 50 bucks or so over the right price may go directly to TSMC.
     
  6. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,828 (13.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,202
    But Nvidia said soon?! How dissappointing. :(
     
  7. ViperXTR

    ViperXTR

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,394 (1.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    407
    nVidia: We expected more from 7900
    AMD: We expected higher yield from Kepler
    Problem nVidia? trollface.jpg
     
  8. theonedub

    theonedub habe fidem

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    Messages:
    7,171 (3.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,725
    It would be more surprising if there weren't issues. I'm looking forward to the next Nvidia offering.
     
    hellrazor says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  9. NC37

    NC37

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,198 (0.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    266
    Every year it seems there is another production problem related to TSMC or GF. Really makes me want to ask an ATI exec if they factored that in when they decided to close their in house fabs and go with them. Bad publicity + delays like this have to cut into profits. Maybe the cheaper production outweighs this but I'd have for sure looked at this downside and considered that in the long run it would be better to keep things in house.
     
    Super XP and hellrazor say thanks.
  10. BlackOmega

    BlackOmega

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2009
    Messages:
    624 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    159
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    This is basically a message saying "Hey guys, I know you wanted a competitively priced GPU from us, but because our yields are total suck ass, they're going to be expensive as hell. Sorry."

    So we can expect a GPU that may outperform the 79xx series, but a quite the price premium.
     
  11. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,828 (13.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,202
    ...and they knew it all along. Their previous comments were nothing but to keep people from purchasing from their competition.
     
    AsRock says thanks.
  12. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,150 (1.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    583
    How is it that nVidia is the only one affected by the hard drive shortage? AMD never said it's GPU sales were affected by the shortage.
     
  13. BlackOmega

    BlackOmega

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2009
    Messages:
    624 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    159
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    Of course they did. But the whole "wait for x to come out" thing works really well.
     
  14. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    Looking forward to the finished product, 79xx didn't impress me.
    Come on Nvidia, can't wait to get back to good OpenGL support.
     
    hellrazor and Fluffmeister say thanks.
  15. BlackOmega

    BlackOmega

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2009
    Messages:
    624 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    159
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    Actually now that I think about it for more than second, I'm wondering if this is just a fake shortage to falsely inflate their prices.
     
    erocker says thanks.
  16. Fluffmeister

    Fluffmeister

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    692 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    198
    I agree, looking forward to see what Kepler offers.

    :D
     
  17. badtaylorx

    badtaylorx

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Messages:
    482 (0.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    152
    why make the comment in the first place???

    we allready knew that kepler wouldnt be here for a cppl more months??? :confused:
     
    Fluffmeister says thanks.
  18. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    13,074 (4.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,652
    Sounds alot like Fermi. Who thinks Nv needs a corporate realignment?
     
    Super XP says thanks.
  19. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,063 (6.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,122
    I'm pretty sure the whole "our mid-range cards will outperform their top end" was kind of a hint that kepler would be expensive as hell. Basically saying the mid-range was going to start at $500...
     
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  20. entropy13

    entropy13

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,953 (2.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,215
    You mean "sounds alot (sic) like the first Fermi."
     
  21. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    13,074 (4.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,652
    Ya took a revision to fix it. Eh basically a 2900/3870 deal
     
  22. semantics

    semantics

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2011
    Messages:
    111 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17
    maybe they need to hire new experts making these projections which always seem wrong.
     
    eidairaman1 says thanks.
  23. Inceptor

    Inceptor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    497 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    119
    Projections are almost always wrong. Period. Full stop.
    Criticizing on the basis of a commentary which was, at best, cryptic, is just as wrong.

    So, NV says it's all TSMC's fault. Why? because they have to; they can't ship out a ton of GPUs now, if they say nothing and pretend it's all OK, it'll be a bit like the Bulldozer rollout for them.

    "Hey guys, our 28nm yield is pretty bad, so uhh, you're gonna pay for it, and unless you fork over the money IMMEDIATELY to get the few cards we ship, you're gonna wait for it."
    *NV guy waves his hand at you as you look at those AMD GPUs and says,*
    "Those aren't the cards you're looking for, move along now. Here's a shiny brochure about the awesomness you can have from us.... six months from now."
     
    eidairaman1 says thanks.
  24. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    13,074 (4.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,652
    Your Last Line Makes me laugh hard

     
  25. NAVI_Z

    NAVI_Z New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    254 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    37
    sike !...:roll::roll::roll:
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page