1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Preparing First Fermi-Derivative Performance GPU, GF104

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Mar 26, 2010.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,847 (11.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,714
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    With the launch of GeForce GTX 400 series enthusiast-grade graphics cards based on the GF100 GPU being a stone's throw away, it is learned that work could be underway at NVIDIA to develop a new performance GPU as a successor to G92 and its various derivatives, according to 3DCenter.org, a German tech portal. Codenamed GF104, the new GPU targets performance/price sweet-spots the way G92 did back in its day with the GeForce 8800 GT and 8800 GTS-512, which delivered high-end sort of performance at "unbelievable" price points. The GF104 is a derivative of the Fermi architecture, and uses a physically down-scaled design of the GF100. It is said to pack 256 CUDA cores, 32 ROPs, 32 TMUs, and a 256-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface. The more compact die as a result could achieve high clock speeds, like G92 did compared to the G80.

    GF104 is believed to form three SKUs to fill performance-thru-mainstream market segments, starting with the fastest GeForce GTS 450, GeForce GTS 440, and GeForce GTS 430 (likely name). Among these, the GTS 450 enables all of GF104's features and specifications, with well over 700 MHz core speed, 1500 MHz shader, and 1800 MHz memory. This part could be priced at around the 240 EUR mark, and target performance levels of the ATI Radeon HD 5830. A notch lower, the GTS 440 has all the hardware inside the GF104 enabled, but has around 20% lower clock speeds, priced over 160 EUR, under 180 EUR. At the bottom is the so-called GTS 430, which could disable a few of the GPU's components, with 192 CUDA cores, and 192-bit GDDR5 memory interface, priced under $150. The lower two SKUs intend to compete with the Radeon HD 5700 series. The source says that the new SKUs could be out this summer.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Source: 3DCenter.org
     
  2. DaMulta

    DaMulta My stars went supernova

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    16,119 (5.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,455
    Location:
    Oklahoma T-Town
    HD 2900XT all over again?????
     
  3. shevanel

    shevanel New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,479 (1.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    406
    Location:
    Leesburg, FL
    this answers my question... the one i had about which half-assed approach would NV take to compete with the mainstream market. although i will admit this sounds better than i had imagined. :roll:
     
    Soylent Joe says thanks.
  4. Binge

    Binge Overclocking Surrealism

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,982 (3.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,752
    Location:
    PA, USA
    wtf GF104? lammemeeeeeeeeeeee
     
  5. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,847 (11.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,714
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    GF104 is a GPU codename like GF100. It won't be printed on boxes so nothing lame about the name.
     
  6. wahdangun

    wahdangun New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,512 (0.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    114
    Location:
    indonesia ku tercinta
    WTF!!!!!, is this what nvdia promise ????:rolleyes:


    it's really lame, i want GTX 480 benched right now!!!!!:cry:
     
  7. roast

    roast

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2009
    Messages:
    592 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    101
    Location:
    Ireland.
    I'm expecting GTX470 and 480 to be fail., and on that note, With these GF104 chips, I think NV could be on to a real winner. This could replace all of the G92 cards around, and if NV plan it right and set the right price, this would be all OEM's new favorite chip.... rebranding every two months...

    I'm not saying I'm happy about it, but it would be a great money spinner for nVidia
     
  8. kajson

    kajson

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Messages:
    145 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    27
    first actually launch the main product, then start boasting about cheaper/better derivatives......

    Or maybe they'll just pospone the main product indefinitely and move straight to the derivatives
     
  9. KainXS

    KainXS

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,601 (2.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    502
    well I can only expect that they will remove half the sm's completely and 2 memory controllers but keep the layout of the sm's the same, if they did this then the GF104 would not have 64TMU's it would have 32, not even the GTX480 has 64TMU's, but since these chips will be so scalable they could just drop sm's and keep adding new cards by mixing different #'s of sm's with different# of memory controllers.

    woops read wrong it says 32
     
  10. EchoMan New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    Messages:
    73 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    So who would buy a gts 450 @ 240 EUR when you can buy a 5850 right now for less?
     
  11. Divide Overflow

    Divide Overflow

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2009
    Messages:
    198 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    57
    Actual product name GF404?
     
  12. TheGuruStud

    TheGuruStud

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,642 (0.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    173
    Location:
    Police/Nanny State of America
    Yeah, the price and perf is [​IMG]

    They're gonna have to do better than that to compete.
     
  13. monte84

    monte84 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2008
    Messages:
    153 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    23
    wasn't today supposed to be the release date?
     
  14. springs113

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    725 (0.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    158
    i thought the same over @ xtremes....they have posted some numbers and i must say ATI win NV Fail
     
  15. madswimmer

    madswimmer New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    107 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    today is the release at pax east, sposed to have 5 ct
     
  16. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,202 (5.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,985
    Location:
    Home
    Error code 404, more like
     
  17. Roph

    Roph

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    380 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    109
    Nvidia are actually... replacing G92? Not renaming it again? G92 will finally die?

    Credit where credit is due :toast:

    [​IMG]
     
    Divide Overflow says thanks.
  18. gvblake22

    gvblake22

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    368 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    74
    Location:
    Arizona, USA
    If these tables prove accurate, these will be the first mid-range video cards to not feature a 128-bit memory bus. The lowest is 192-bit and 256-bit for the middle and highest mid-range parts. I'm actually looking forward to the GTS450!
     
  19. Imsochobo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    514 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    35
    Location:
    I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
    HD 5770.......
     
    PCpraiser100 says thanks.
  20. PCpraiser100 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,062 (0.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    68
    Its a sign that Nvidia is hyping the party up to confuse people. Fan boys are having techgasms atm while we OC our HD 5000 cards and previous gen cards at this time.
     
  21. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,893 (13.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,297
    People, right in the pictures it shows GTS 430, GTS 440 and GTS 450. I think you can come up with a good guess on what cards they will replace. ;)
     
  22. Valdez

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    294 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    Szekszárd, Hungary
  23. gvblake22

    gvblake22

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    368 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    74
    Location:
    Arizona, USA
    I may be reading this wrong, but it looks like it says Bus Width: 128 Bit...

    [​IMG]
     
  24. Imsochobo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    514 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    35
    Location:
    I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
    Sorry mate, late at night after a loong day, or three loong weeks with work everyday, starting to get to me, finally holiday.

    Read wrong on ur comment and on the specs, was sure i read 128 bit, confused me :S

    Still, theese will be expensive, and yet slower than 5850 all of them, same production price...
    No 64 bit float like the big bro's.

    What is there to them ?
     
  25. gvblake22

    gvblake22

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    368 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    74
    Location:
    Arizona, USA
    HAHA, no worries bro. ;)
    How do you know the production costs already? The target prices quoted in the article could be inflated by nVidia to start with and not indicative of actual production cost, leaving room for price drops and such. Either way though, those prices seem a bit on the high side, especially considering the very well received 5850 will keep dropping in price bit by bit until these things actually reach the market. Only time will tell I guess!
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2010

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page