1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Timing GeForce GTX 880 Launch with Gamescom?

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jul 23, 2014.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,510 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,636
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    NVIDIA is reportedly preparing new graphics cards based on the "Maxwell" architecture, which judging by the purported 3DMark FireStrike screenshots, could be high-end parts, maybe even the GeForce GTX 880. The cards could launch along the sidelines of Gamescon, a gaming expo held each year in Cologne, Germany, around mid-August. Given how most information to date points to a later-Q3, maybe even mid-Q4 launch of these cards, it wouldn't surprise us if NVIDIA merely teases these cards. NVIDIA's next big consumer GPU is widely expected to be the GM204, a performance-segment chip based on the "Maxwell" architecture.

    [​IMG]

    Source: VideoCardz
  2. mroofie

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2013
    Messages:
    165 (0.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16
    Videocardz the best reliable source ever NOT!!!
    and yes im also waiting for this to turn into a amd fanboy section :p
    I must do it for my country :D
  3. ZoneDymo

    ZoneDymo

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    383 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Can't see in what way this potential news could turn into an "AMD fanboy" section
    Lionheart says thanks.
  4. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,350 (1.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    434
    Doesn't sound plausible. GM 204 tape out seems to be generally accepted as April, so 8-12 weeks fabrication time and testing at the bare minimum, and that's assuming the first-run A1 silicon needs no revision, you'd still need to take into account die packaging, building the boards (presumably Foxconn), packaging and shipping...and that's assuming that Nvidia's fab schedule hasn't been revised. Seems like an awfully tight schedule.
    Hi ! Welcome to the internet !
    If this thread follows just about any other graphics story since 1998, You'll probably be seeing comments along the lines of " too expensive" (even though no pricing is mentioned), "I don't like Nvidia because [insert random proprietary tech]", followed by some rambling about drivers, SLI scaling, the absolute necessity of DirectCompute and GPGPU functionality, and never-to-be-attained-theoretical FLOPS performance, relative price-per-perf, and perf -per-watt of cards that aren't the GTX 880. Cue backlash. Cue unrelated comparisons and anecdotal sob stories of dashed dreams.
    Something like that....but it won't just be AMD fanboys involved.
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2014
  5. RCoon

    RCoon Forum Gypsy

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Messages:
    6,848 (7.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,129
    Location:
    Gypsyland, UK
    This needs to be copied and pasted into the Forum Rules section, so every time somebody posts one of those generic statements for AMD or NVidia they get backhanded by every member for being a tool and sent to the naughty corner to read the rules again.
  6. urza26

    urza26

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Messages:
    206 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    24
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Matrox rocks!! I managed to circumvent the rules, victory is mine! :p
    RCoon says thanks.
  7. alwayssts

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Messages:
    364 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    79
    Nice random voodoo2-era reference. My 9700 still kicks your FX5800's ass, and it was $100 cheaper...Not to mention I got to play BF1942 and Hot Pursuit 2 at playable settings for a few months before you! /JK.

    Let me just start it off by saying it simply looks like both AMD/nvidia will have fairly-optimized 64 ROP parts (more-or-less 4x the ps4 gpu spec, the same way Hawaii/GK110 products are ~4x xboxone). Both look to be coming relatively soon and on 28nm. That both companies seemed to make that feasible is pretty astounding, even if HPL saves a bunch of power...should be some big freakin' chips. I'm sure they will be very nice, bump each current series down a peg (while being themselves refreshed in one form or another) and truly usher in 4k gaming while elevating the baseline...

    But yeah...How much $? Prolly a lot. Not just kind of a lot, prolly a lot a lot. Also, if in a similar power envelope, at what point does more units at a lower clock really make a lot more sense than less overclocked to a higher one, even if more efficient?

    On a purely fundamental level, I wonder how each achieves this feat architecturally speaking. I could see AMD doing 512-bit and 7gbps ram, but what about nvidia? Tons of cache (bigger chip) and slower ram? Should be interesting. /#jointhespeculation.
  8. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,350 (1.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    434
    If GK 110 managed to marry a 384-bit I/O with 7Gb/s GDDR5, I wouldn't see them going slower with their next part. If the GM 204 is indeed 256-bit then 7Gb/sec should be considered baseline for bandwidth I would have thought. Couldn't see Nvidia going any less than what GK 104 achieved (224GB/sec bandwidth) TBH.
    L2 cache - if GM 204 follows GM107's example, will be sizeable and should allow for a reasonable speedup. The GM 107 suffers in heavily in comparison to GK 106's bandwidth, bus width, memory speed, core count, ROP count, and texture address units, but the cache structure certainly mitigates what should be a major performance disparity.
  9. Kaotik New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    24 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    VideoCardz, and everyone spreading their 'news', is being fooled here.

    The NV UK's facebook post was never attached to the image above it. The T-27, at the date it was posted, matches to the date Shield-tablet will be available in UK.
  10. Dj-ElectriC

    Dj-ElectriC

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,178 (1.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    834
    You guys are just trash talkin'.

    This picture of 3DMark looks completely legit and there's no way this isn't a GTX 880. Clearly.


    :|
  11. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,289 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,510
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    How dare you sarcastically imply 3DMark images can be falsified. Here's my latest run.

    [​IMG]
    Xzibit, GreiverBlade, Mathragh and 2 others say thanks.
  12. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,655 (5.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,269
    Hurry the fuck up Nvdia! My money is waiting!
  13. GhostRyder

    GhostRyder

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    Messages:
    926 (6.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    328
    Meh, seems a bit early in all honesty for an August release because a month ago it seemed like things were at a stand still. But I digress, that is why rumors are called rumors, now its just going to come down to which one is correct, I guess we will hear soon enough.
  14. yogurt_21

    yogurt_21

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,393 (1.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    560
    Location:
    AZ
    Personally I'd be surprised if we got a new maxwell based highend gpu before they finished refreshing their notebook gpu lineup with maxwell. So i'd actually expect to see the 880m maxwell before a new maxwell based highend for the desktop. The 860m maxwell came out in march but the 870m and 880m remained kepler parts.

    being that low power is maxwell's bread and butter I'd expect the mobile solutions to be fully vetted before the desktop high ends come out.
  15. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    9,956 (6.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,221
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Perhaps the best post you have ever made...........ever.
  16. Fluffmeister

    Fluffmeister

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    649 (0.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    HumanSmoke is basically the only person who speaks sense on this forum, so no surprise. :laugh:
  17. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,379 (4.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,450

    Lmfao
  18. LeonVolcove

    LeonVolcove

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2014
    Messages:
    146 (0.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12
    Now AMD just need to bring something similiar like what they did with R9 290/290x and we have more competition coming
  19. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,289 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,510
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    Which at this point would mean they just need to bring a rumour. These ultra early, unsubstantiated near fabrications deserve nought but a fart in their general direction. Seriously, if NV do bring something out this Autumn, well super dooper but let's all remain calm and rationale. Kepler had a year head start on Hawaii (GK110 HPC release) so if NV do have something it would be unlikely (unfortunately) for AMD to have their new arch out. That being said, why would NV release their 'next gen' when their current single GPU is the better performer? Doesn't make business sense for NV to release 880 yet.
    AMD may have the tech crown for their 295 but that probably doesn't worry NV. I could see NV sitting on their Maxwell cards until AMD 'next gen' rumours started.
  20. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,969 (7.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,526
    Except me. I always shoot torpedo's of truth. Bulletproof facts doused in horrible grammar and off color analogies with a side of I told you so and assholism. Finished off with a three month ban for wielding unadulterated truth with troll dressing.
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2014
  21. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,281 (2.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,173

    I prefer Cirrus Logic, 24 bit true color, but only at lower resolutions as you run out of memory. The unparalleled stability of their drives were second to none. performance per watt, what watt, they weren't even cooled they processed pixels with black magic. The single VGA output was elegant and the satin finish on the IO shield was by far superior to Matrox and their tin.
    10 Million points folded for TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page