1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA to Take on Xeon and Opteron with a "Boulder"

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Sep 24, 2012.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,258 (11.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,586
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    The enterprise CPU market is about to flare up soon, with the introduction of a third player in high-performance chips, next to Intel Xeon and AMD Opteron. X-bit Labs unearthed plans by NVIDIA to build on its Tegra success by designing high-performance server processors based on the ARM machine-architecture. The server market is far more varied in terms of machine-architectures, than PC, and the addition of an ARM-based high-performance chip is unlikely to fail. NVIDIA reportedly codenamed its development "Project Boulder."

    Due in 2014, the CPU built under Project Boulder will be designed to, at least initially, replace traditional x86 Xeon/Opteron CPUs in Tesla Compute Accelerators, machines loaded with Tesla GPUs to process complex computational problems. The Boulder chip will be designed to handle serial processing loads, leaving parallel loads to the GPUs. A lot could ride on Boulder's success, as it could motivate NVIDIA to address other computing segments.

    [​IMG]

    Source: X-bit Labs
    Recus says thanks.
  2. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,093 (5.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,514
    Location:
    Florida
    idk if i want them to spread that far
  3. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,258 (11.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,586
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    CPUs could do with some competition. Breaking up another pseudo-bipoly.
    Solaris17 says thanks.
  4. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,093 (5.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,514
    Location:
    Florida
    i see that but i would rather it come from someone like VIA instead of a graphics card manufacturer being too successful in more then one area. they are already a dominant force in the mobile world. Wish S3 wasnt dead. they could keep AMD and nvidia busy if they had the money. I dont mind google, I just dont want the hardware version of it.

    soon ill be buying a fridge with an nvidia logo.
  5. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,258 (11.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,586
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    VIA has no resources to design a high-performance CPU. NVIDIA has over 3x the resources of AMD.
  6. Covert_Death

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    308 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    i think your over-reacting a tad lol, yes they are branching out but they don't really have THAT much going on.

    any competition is better than less competition as well... if this pushes AMD and Intel to be even more competitive i'm all for it, regardless of WHO is behind the move.

    maybe one day they will branch into the high performance desktop CPU market, i'd probably never buy one unless they just came out with something amazing but again if it pushed AMD and intel to be more competitive and excel their products even more then i'm all game.
  7. damric

    damric

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    359 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    95
    This is good competition. AMD and everyone else need more pressure on Intel.
  8. Solaris17

    Solaris17 Creator Solaris Utility DVD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,093 (5.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,514
    Location:
    Florida
    im not over reacting, just saying id rather see a new company challenge the norm then a company that already dominates several markets. that only stays competition for so long then it becomes monopoly.
  9. SaltyFish

    SaltyFish

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    304 (0.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    HERE COMES A NEW CHALLENGER!

    Er, sort of. Nvidia is better equipped than VIA to cause a ruckus in the CPU duopoly. Remember when Nvidia was doing motherboard chipsets? Yeah...
  10. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,354 (6.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,367
    Location:
    IA, USA
    VIA can release x86 CPUs and NVIDIA can't. Although VIA's x86 CPUs are slow comparing to Intel and AMD, they still compete.

    I can only see NVIDIA competing in specialized environments. Intel and AMD will continue to dominent the generalized market where they need to handle any task given with as little fuss as possible. It really is no different than NVIDIA's Tesla--some use it but most don't.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  11. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,085 (4.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,377
    X86 licensing issues will ensue for NV, i see intel slapping them
  12. MySchizoBuddy New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2012
    Messages:
    21 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    It's an ARM core it doesn't use X86 ISA
  13. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,169 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    185
    This should be interesting..... intel seeks to perfect graphics... nvidia ...the cpu. We win no matter what, Would've been nice to see an intel chip with integrated nvidia graphic cores though, but alas only in a more perfect world.
  14. jihadjoe

    jihadjoe

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    385 (0.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    97
    lol I wonder if the codename is a stab at AMD's misfiring bulldozers. :laugh:
  15. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,209 (1.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    372
    The immoveable object meets the resistable force ?
  16. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,356 (2.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    552
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    Wow what a surprise :eek:, not:D

    Given project denver is similar and they have said there next gpu will contain an Arm core this is a natural progression and exactly what i and others said would happen.

    now wheres Avonx, he needs to read this,, :p
  17. NC37

    NC37

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,175 (0.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    262
    With the level of resources they have we might just see nvidia create the first CPU which truly utilizes GPU tech to the fullest. A complete merger of both CPU and GPU. Not like APUs where it is still a CPU with GPU on die side by side. Something I think AMD was eventually wanting to move to with APUs but is many generations away from achieving it.
  18. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,356 (2.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    552
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    your day dreaming, AMD are on that path and the excavator equiped APU will have much better GPU integration then other similar cpu's, Arm cores have been put on die with Gfx cores for some time now and nvidia are the least far along this tech, qualcom is further along then nvidia down that path let alone AMD and this wont hit consumer devices till way after AMD have a supperior x86-64 version (not arm)that wont need any special software etc , just to use it.

    oh and on die gpu elements dont do ivybridges video handling any harm , or trinity for that matter , id count that as actual use.:)
  19. badtaylorx

    badtaylorx

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Messages:
    470 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    152
    if successful, the influx of capital from this market could really drive gpu progress
  20. mauriek

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Messages:
    199 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    80
    Location:
    Mataram-NTB, Indonesia
    What make they really think any programmer/software developer would support their "boulder", this is add a LOT of programming code complexity, load balancing, sharing resource..what they will do? fully support OpenCL?

    Making Tegra GPU or next gen Boulder to handle serial computing is a lot of burden for programmer, it is possible but still a long way to anything feasible..

    ARM+Tegra = new high performance server CPU?? even AMD with a huge early start in APU (x86 + GPU) still have many difficulties in making programmer to fully support and take the real performance advantage of unified computing of APU.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  21. AlienIsGOD

    AlienIsGOD

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    3,412 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,464
    lol at the Hulk Hogan/Andre the Giant reference :D RIP Gorilla Monsoon
    Crunching for Team TPU
  22. Xzibit

    Xzibit

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,107 (1.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    253
    More than a year late on this...

    This is a referance to Project Denver which was announced in a Q&A by Jen-Hsun Huang at 2011 Computer Electronic Show

    Look up the transcript from the event.

    Some other fun quotes from 2011 CES about Project Denver.

    Last edited: Sep 24, 2012
  23. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,356 (2.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    552
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    To be fair its an evolving topic that everyone might not be aware of, Win8Rt isnt exactly widespread yet either so noone is seeing this future yet bar enthusiasts:)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page