1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Working on Second GK110-based GeForce Graphics Card for Summer

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Mar 18, 2013.

  1. Jacez New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2013
    Messages:
    50 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Okay, I'm not sure why you're nit-picking my post.

    My point was about the GTX 590 and onwards, not the preceding generations. Their only purpose was to build up a case.

    But I thought I'd respond anyway.

    Well, it's my comparison, so yes, in fact.. I do get to choose.

    Define "marginally". It was no more than a 2% overclock on an "OC" edition card that typically adds 10$ to the stock price. Except this time, it was 200$.. which is why an XTX was a good way to tell whether someone was a hardware enthusiast or not.

    You can quote links all you like - the MSRP wasn't correct in the 7800 GTX 512's case.

    Thanks for the history lesson, but I was alive in 2007, as well.

    Yes, I did.

    I didn't have room for the HD 5970, because the HD 5000 series was more of an inbetween than a rival, since the GTX 200 series was GPU-for-GPU for powerful and the GTX 400 series was late.

    Yes, HD 7970 started at 550$, but when GTX 680 came out the price dropped to 500$.. which is what counts.

    (I can accept "tend to be cyclic", but "tend to cyclic" simply doesn't sound right.)

    Yes, they tend to be. Yes, it is a general rule. That is precisely the issue.
    You're missing the point with your lax generalizations. The only reason graphics cards won't cost 2,000$ is because the international over-arching consumer hyperbole of demand cannot extend that far. At a certain point, raising a price on a product with a hard-demand inclination does lower its demand, and no one is going to pay 2,000$ for a graphics card.
    This does not mean that we're not already in deep shit. 1,000$ for a graphics card that would have cost 500$ 3 years ago, is ridiculous. The cycle has clearly changed.


    You're making my point for me. Yes, prices have been going up for some time now. This is bad.

    Yes, a company that priced its cards at 2,500$ could not compete and now no longer exists.

    Miracles do occur.

    And ATi's All-in-Wonder cards are also extinct.
     
  2. tokyoduong

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2013
    Messages:
    478 (0.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    119
    It's not insulting or generalizations. It's called exaggeration because everyone is complaining about pricing of a product that is obviously going to be overpriced.

    If you want to analyze this from a economic/financial stand point.

    Top 3 reasons this product will be priced high:

    Low Volume: manufacturing involves fixed cost + variable cost so economy of scales great vary cost per unit produced. The higher the volume the less the fixed cost have an effect on each unit.

    Cost Push: due to low volume, complexity, bleeding edge tech requirements, and very limited # of facilities that can actually produce this. The cost per chip will be higher not because of anything besides a lack of options. That cost will be passed onto the customer

    Small market: demand is very low for this product, even in this forum there's only a handful that will actually think about buying it. Even a smaller amount will actually buy it.

    Let's talk about why initial pricing doesn't matter because of equilibrium and substitute goods.

    If price is higher than equilibrium then consumers won't buy or buy less of it. There will be a surplus. Since this is low volume then # of unsold units will have a higher % impact than a high volume product. You will bet that retailers/eseller/oem will cut orders and it will look drastic since a store would only order 20 and they cut it to 5, it will look like a 75% drop in demand. That kind of %s will raise eyebrows of statisticians at NVIDIA immediately. They will adjust prices accordingly almost immediately. Why? NVIDIA doesn't want fire sales and stacks of their flag ship cards in all stores and tarnish their "superior goods" image.

    Second, you have many options for substitute goods. NVIDIA has substitute goods themselves such as SLI of several different products that can match or exceed the same performance by this card. You also have choices of AMD cards and their CF. Then you also have consoles and their coming next gen launch.

    Conclusion: they can price it whatever they want but it won't matter so stop complaining. It's not like they're the only one making graphics chips and consumers have no choice.
     
    HumanSmoke says thanks.
  3. jihadjoe

    jihadjoe

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    393 (0.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    101
    Gtx780!
     
  4. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,537 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    547
    Ah, I see. Cherry picking a time range using cherry picked parameters that don't bear any relationship to the vendors actual card hierarchy using your own personal pricing conventions that bear little in common with reality- an argument you're bound to win :rolleyes:...An example:
    You mean like this one:
    ...a bargain considering nVIDIA’s current pricing for the 7800GTX 512MB of $699USD
    Or this, or this, or this, or this, or this...
    Feel free to post some proof that the 7800GTX 512MB was selling below MSRP

    If we're cherry picking- or to use your rationale "Well, it's my comparison, so yes, in fact.. I do get to choose", here's another taking into account limited production run cards for the uber-enthusiast:
    6800 Ultra Extreme 512MB...$899
    7800 GTX Black Pearl....$999
    8800 Ultra Leviathan...$899
    HD 5970 4GB...$1000-1199
    Asus Mars....$1500
    Asus Ares......$1000
    Asus Mars II...$1499
    HD 7970 6GB...$700
    HD 7990......$799-899
    Asus Ares II...$1699
    GTX 690......$1000
    GTX Titan....$1000
     
  5. badtaylorx

    badtaylorx

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2011
    Messages:
    487 (0.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    153
    ahhhh.....i think nvidia means to say they're launching the GTX 770 this summer??? :confused:

    or was the titan just a 680ti???
     
  6. Jacez New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2013
    Messages:
    50 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    :twitch:

    Are you for real..?

    So, I disagree with you about the price of the 7800 GTX 512 and HD 7970, both of which have no bearing on my overall summation in any way, and that's all you want to talk about?

    It's like saying "I think we should feed starving children in Africa" and someone getting pissed off at you, completely forgetting your point, because "they're technically toddlers, not children."

    Listen, if you ever fill out that prescription, drop me a line, alright?
     
  7. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,537 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    547
    Hell no.
    The fact that you can't accept that you got called out for quoting cherry picked- and some obviously false price points to bolster your argument. I provided relevant links to educate and forestall any unsubstantiated claims. As for what I wanted to talk about- how about a whole babble of hyperbole that stems from your first post:
    And, no, it does not. EVERY time an expensive limited production hardware arrives, some knee-jerk reactionaries seem unable to stop themselves from donning the "The End is Nigh" sandwich board.
    For someone so concerned about conciseness and relevancy in posting, I'd also note that you were quite happy to wander (way) off topic and make some deal over an obvious typo:
    Anyhow I done. Feel free to call my attention to the pricing of the GTX 780 if it retails anywhere close to $2000.
     
  8. HammerON

    HammerON The Watchful Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,571 (3.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,682
    Alright folks, let's stop the bickering and move along.
     
    jihadjoe and Aquinus say thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  9. Jacez New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2013
    Messages:
    50 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Sorry, Hammer.. but I can't let such pretentiousness continue. Feel free to delete our posts if you see fit.

    Lol. Don't you just love it when you can tell the egomaniacs by their over-used vocabulary?

    You chose to completely divert the attention from the topic at hand because you *gasp* took issue with 2 (out of the 20) numbers I put up.

    Well, congratulations. You were right! The 7800 GTX 512 did retail for 650$.

    Would you like that (1) internet now or after you've finished gratifying yourself at the thundering roar of your own awesomeness?

    Generalizing me into a pool of people you don't respect does not denote that you're right.

    The fact is, your broad understatement of the situation only trivializes a very important issue.

    Yes, USUALLY price increases don't last, but USUALLY they are the cause of a lack of competition, which is entirely understandable (i.e. 8800 Ultra)..

    But now we have a precedent. Both companies are heightening their prices of competing products. It's no different than price fixing, except that it is not intentional and thus not illegal. It does, however, suck majorly for the consumer.

    Why does it matter?! 1,000$ is too much!
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2013
  10. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,900 (6.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,481
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    I'm not saying your wrong so don't go getting defensive, you're pandering to the wrong person. I'm just saying if you have a point, you can make it without insulting people and making insulting generalizations about people. Keep your posts mature and thoughtful and I typically won't have a problem with them. There is a reason why a mod deleted the post, and I'm sure it's not because of your stance on this issue.
    You're asking for an infraction. When a moderator asks you to do something (or not to do something) on the forum, it's usually unwise to disobey them in public as opposed to messaging him or her in private.
     
  11. Jacez New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2013
    Messages:
    50 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Yuppers. That's why I replied to him specifically in my post.
     
  12. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,900 (6.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,481
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    Which is not private. Read the rules, please.

    http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/announcement.php?f=14

     
  13. Casecutter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,191 (0.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    90
    Location:
    So. Cal.
    It took all your cut-and-paste-wordy-ness of a bunch of who' knows of their credibility reviews to supposedly make your point. I'm not contesting the pricing of the Titian, a Halo card is whatever...

    I went by the W1zzard, and a 2560x the minimum resolution anyone would think of buying something like that for. I wish W1zzard would've average out his 5760x1080 results. :confused:

    I do understand your "other possible workload the cards' user base might employ... intended market for the card" for Titian, and in that realm it's a no-brainer against dedicated workstation hardware. Although, does Nvidia propagandize this gelding it as such, it will chiefly tested for gaming. Sure it's a part of the claim, but truly a small foundation of the marketing, and we what to see how a 13 SMX (14% less) provides against the 7970 architecture.

    I'm not against the Nvidia design or performance, just their Green Team Marketing that continues to live off the "G92 Glory Years". :twitch:

    I am a fan of the GTX670 the best card Nvidia has produce in many moon’s; a nice reference design is a great purchase when it can be had for $320. I also like the GTX650Ti, but really only a sensible buy when you can find say a MSI PE for $130 and add a little oomph.

    Titian is having it's time on the mount as well it should, however the "Runt of Titian"… sorry it doesn't appear to have any "trickle-down" affect, not unless Nvidia surprises with a $600 price point.
     
  14. Xzibit

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,137 (1.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    260
    Starting public drama is HumanSmoke modus operandi with anything Nvidia.

    Even when you point out hes wrong he switches to something else to point out hes right all along

    You have my sympathy Jacez and welcome to Techpowerup. Get used to him...
     
  15. Hood

    Hood

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Messages:
    823 (1.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    247
    I'm on Nvidia for years now, because the equivalent Radeon cards are hotter running, noisier and more power hungry. But the real deal-killers are the perennially buggy drivers and software supplied by AMD. CCC is a joke, I've never seen a program that crashed so often and for no apparent reason (several versions/cards). For this reason alone, I avoid ATI/AMD like the plague. If you make your choice because of a few lousy dollars saved, my advice is save up for an extra week or two and always buy Nvidia.
     
  16. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,900 (6.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,481
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    nVidia was pretty bad with power consumption and heat prior to the GTX 600 series cards. The GTX 500 and 400 series loved to eat power. I've had more issues with nVidia drivers than I have had with AMD drivers. AMD has also never fried any of my hardware. I have a GeForce 8600 GTS that fried the DDC on one of my displays at work. I also don't need to update my drivers for my AMD cards nearly as often as I did with nVidia, so its a double edged sword. My experiences with AMD have been pretty good.

    I've never had CCC crash on me and drivers will fail very rarely and when it does it's usually related to my overclock and running crossfire at the same time, not my drivers.

    So all in all, I'm sorry that you've had a bad experience but I haven't experienced what you have with AMD, and I think it is worse that nVidia damages hardware rather than just crashing.

    So yeah, even if my AMD video cards did crash a couple times, I would prefer that to my nVidia card bricking a display. It also wouldn't be the first time that I had a nVidia card that didn't work right.

    ---

    With all of this said though, this thread isn't a Red vs Green thread so we should stop this argument right here. :) If you really want to continue it then I think it calls for a new thread or a PM war, but I won't be arguing the point beyond this post.
     
  17. EpicShweetness

    EpicShweetness

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    321 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    31
    Location:
    Ft Gordon
    Hella! That's the first price that popped into my head with the obscene pricing NVIDIA has been doing lately. :shadedshu
     
  18. Casecutter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,191 (0.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    90
    Location:
    So. Cal.
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2013
    Aquinus says thanks.
  19. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,537 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    547
    I think W1zzard has commented before that it is because of the relative lack of cards for comparison at that resolution- 5760x1080 only recently being added to the benchmarks. If you're wanting a graphic boiled down to a single number, you'll have to keep a few bookmarks handy - a comparison of sites also throws up a wider range of games/apps, and driver issues, which are more prevalent with multi-monitor gaming.
    Aside from TPU, Anandtech, Hardware Canucks, ComputerBase, Alienbabeltech, Sweclockers, HardwareLUXX, Hardware.info, bit-tech, OCC, Tom's Hardware and HiTech Legion also benched at 5760x1080. HardwareLUXX also benched a fairly gruelling 5760x1080 using sparse grid super sampling (SGSSAA).
    And both you and I are part of the explanation. Look at the sheer number of forum threads, arguments, and postings in mainstream tech sites whose bread and butter is gaming orientated hardware concerning the Titan. The PR value Nvidia has reaped from the Titan far outweighs any profit from the cards themselves. If they sell 10,000 cards and make $500 off each one (doubtful unless yields are spectacular), that nets them $5m. PR and the halo effect probably outweigh the monetary return.
    How much discussion takes place regarding Quadro and Tesla cards in comparison on tech sites ? Virtually nil in comparison- pro users generally have a more concise idea of their needs -and they certainly aren't the same tyre-kickers and flamers that frequent mainstream forums commenting on hardware they will never own. Pro graphics/math co-processors don't really need PR -just a solid support base and a given feature set. A pro user isn't going to be debating the cards merits on gaming forums- they're more likely to fire of an email to Boxxtech, Amax, HP, or whomever their last contract was with ( The user can configure workstations using Tesla, Quadro or GeForce in a lot of instances)
    Even with minimal "conventional PR", Nvidia are going to sell a hell of lot more pro boards than GeForce branded ones. Leaving aside every Tesla K20 upgrade from 2050/2070/2090, OEM workstation sales, probable Quadro sales, and whatever number of boardsPiz Daint will require, the count already stands at ~22000 ( ORNL's Titan,NCSA's Blue Waters, and CSCS's Todi).
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2013
  20. TheinsanegamerN

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2012
    Messages:
    230 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    23
    as my freind told me :"you buy amd if you want power, and nvidia if you want stability." After running an AMD laptop for a year now....he was right. AMD may be more powerful, but the constant driver issues and buggy performance (dont get me started on AMD's linux performance) drove me to nvidia. now, everything just works.
     
  21. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,900 (6.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,481
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    Really? I've had good experience with nVidia's Windows drivers but nVidia's dual-monitor support for linux is horrid which is what turned me off. fglrx and radeon drivers do multi-monitor out of the box just fine and lately fglrx has been working great on all the AMD GPUs I have, which is a pleasant surprise.
     
  22. TheinsanegamerN

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2012
    Messages:
    230 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    23
    I think it might depend on the program. although, i had the exact opposite issue with nvidia and amd. FGLRX runs fine with ubuntu, but not other distros, like mint (personal favorite). never had an issue with nvidia and dual monitor in linux though. not quite sure why.

    FWIW: minecraft will NOT run with fglrx without massive amounts of tweaking to get it to stop crashing.
     
  23. Jacez New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2013
    Messages:
    50 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    I've been running an HD 6950 for a year now. Never had a problem with the drivers.
     
  24. Xzibit

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,137 (1.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    260
    The great driver debate...

    This sums it up

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 20, 2013
    Aquinus says thanks.
  25. jihadjoe

    jihadjoe

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    393 (0.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    101

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page