Actually I'm saying the opposite. I was being sarcastic if you didn't get that. I was trying to demostrate that there's no point at which anyone can say "this is enough", because it will not satisfy everyone. Yet it is a fact that the majority of people play on the Wii, or in PC they play casual games, so if we have to draw a line as to where enough would be, shouldn't the line be there, low, and not where you need $300+ on hardware? For me "you need DX11, you need a lot of antialiasing, a lot of details, alot of bla and bla... and you need tesselation, but ey! beware, you only need enough tesselation and we draw the line and only we offer enough tesselation, the competitor is overkill." That makes no sense to me. Either I need it or not, and if I settle for "I need it and I'll pay for it" I want them to give me as much as is posible. In a tech site called TechPowerUp it should be said the more powerful the cards the better, more tesselation the better (especially as it has been demostrated it can be done), , more more and more. Enough? Nah.