1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

OLPC and Intel Part Ways

Discussion in 'News' started by malware, Jan 4, 2008.

  1. malware New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,476 (1.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    956
    Location:
    Bulgaria
    More bad news for the One Laptop per Child (OLPC) project, fortunately this time nobody asks for $20 million in lawsuit. After only six months Intel has announced it is leaving the One Laptop Per Child project. According to Intel, Negroponte asked the chipmaker to stop selling its Classmate PC while it was part of the OLPC, which is currently shipping its XO laptop based on a chip from AMD. Even more surprising, Intel is saying that the OLPC actually asked the chipmaker to stop working with any company that produces low-cost laptops, such as Asus' Eee PC. "It is basically a philosophical impasse and, as a consequence, we’ve decided to go our separate ways," said Intel Asia-Pacific spokesman Nick Jacobs. "Despite many months of work to align Intel and OLPC, fundamental differences remain in our respective approaches to the challenge of bringing technology into education. Intel remains a strong supporter of OLPC’s philanthropic goals, but we were unable to agree to some of their requests ... most notably that we cease support for non-OLPC platforms including the Classmate PC."

    Source: CNET News, Australian IT
  2. Completely Bonkers New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,580 (0.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    516
    WOW. Smackdown to OLPC. "What-the-hell" are they doing with all their ego-political-lobbying and trying to block OEMs from working with other partners? That stinks of serious collusion/anti-competitive behaviour. Why? Must be some very deep vested interests there. I dont like that. Individuals or companies making serious money (or blocking entry to more efficient or cheaper alternatives) that, in the end, get paid for by us, the tax payer.

    It's time OLPC went down. There was always an unpleasant smell around their intentions/methods that we often "forgave" due to the concept of providing cheap resources for education.

    There are more (and non-vested interested) alternatives available later down the 2008 road. I recommend that we support more transparent and ethically responsible organisations than OLPC.

    I'm with Intel on this one.

    It also puts a different spin on this whole Nigerian keyboard issue. I'm sure there's a lot more to the story than what we read in the pro-OLPC version of the story. Can't wait to read the spin OLPC will put on the Intel story.
  3. newbielives New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2005
    Messages:
    164 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Wow I really wanted to believe there were good people running the show at OLPC.
    What a F%ing world

    Go Nigerians!
  4. mdm-adph

    mdm-adph New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,478 (0.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    340
    Location:
    Your house.
    Please, let me get this straight -- you're accusing the OLPC foundation of anti-competitive behaviour... against Intel? Yeah, that stink...? I can understand that it's not familiar -- something tells me that it's the bittersweet smell of integrity.

    Who knows what went on behind the scenes in this? I can almost guarantee you that Intel told the OLPC guys to stop working with AMD -- call me crazy, but that sounds just like something Intel would do.
  5. yogurt_21

    yogurt_21

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,354 (1.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    549
    Location:
    AZ
    lol see the trouble with organizations like olpc is they don't know their bounds. intel was donating it's time to thye project. and yet that didn't seem enough for them, they also wanted them to give up other platforms in which they make profit.

    you don't say "hey thanks for the free bread, but really i wanted sourdough." you're happy for what you get when its donated. lol
  6. Darkrealms

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2007
    Messages:
    850 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    23
    Location:
    USA
    LoL, well they've been in the press a lot lately. Too bad for them none of it seems to be good.
  7. Sasqui

    Sasqui

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    7,472 (2.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,299
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
    Yea, don't look a gift horse... yadda yada yada.

    I think Intel has some sort of special interests in this one that they don't want to admit. Hopefully someone comes up to bat.

    The whole thing is quite amazing that they got this far.
  8. Co_Op

    Co_Op New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    55 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Location:
    Cluj.RO
    A nice article about it here:
    http://overclockers.com/tips01274/

  9. imperialreign

    imperialreign New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,043 (2.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    909
    Location:
    Sector ZZ₉ Plural Z Alpha

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page