1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

PCIE lanes 16/16 8/8 4/4

Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by 2DividedbyZero, Feb 26, 2011.

  1. 2DividedbyZero New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    780 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    in retarded hell
    I have a Rampage II Extreme mobo, I am interested in tri-fire 5970+5870

    my mobo will run at 16x PCIE with 1 card installed and I believe both lanes will run in 8x when 2 cards installed


    I have searched the internets and read a few worrying posts and wish to clear this up...

    When just 5970 fitted on a 16x PCIE lane, the lane is split for both cores having 8x PCIE each
    When 2 cards fitted and the lanes are 8x 8x, a 5970 will then further split the lane to 4x 4x per core???? Is this correct or are the internets wrong?
     
  2. 2DividedbyZero New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    780 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    in retarded hell
  3. HossHuge

    HossHuge

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    2,155 (0.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    591
    Location:
    EDM, AB, CAN
    Like it says. In trifire 1st slot x16, 2nd slot x8, 3rd slot x8

    crossfire 1st slot X16, 2nd slot x16


    So your 5970 will still run a x16...:toast:
     
  4. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    40,504 (12.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15,203
    With two cards fitted it's 16 + 16

    With three cards it's 16 + 8 + 8
     
    2DividedbyZero says thanks.
  5. 2DividedbyZero New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    780 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    in retarded hell

    but unfortunately the 5970 HAS to go in the second slot due to the Accelero Xtreme cooler when a second card fitted (in 1st slot)

    but it says dual 16x, so does that mean both lanes run 16x with 2 cards?
     
  6. 2DividedbyZero New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    780 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    in retarded hell
    cheers erocker u posted whilst i was typing


    (read that as "you posted whilst i was scratching my balls") :D
     
    Last edited: Feb 26, 2011
  7. Undead46

    Undead46 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    257 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    23
    Location:
    USA, Texas
    It doesn't matter, x16 and x8 are so close together, you would probably see 1-3FPS difference between the two.
     
    mastrdrver says thanks.
  8. Spectrum

    Spectrum New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    473 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    48
    Location:
    Surrey, UK
  9. 2DividedbyZero New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    780 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    in retarded hell
    yeah, my concern was - if a 5970 on a 16x PCIe lane ran at 8x 8x per core, then a 5970 on a 8x PCIe lane would run at 4x 4x per core (according to the internets)

    now if it was so, that would be a big difference in speed no?
     
  10. Tatty_One

    Tatty_One Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    17,383 (5.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,105
    Location:
    Worcestershire, UK
    No, the primary slot is the only slot that will give you x16 when the secondary is populated, if your 5970 is in the secondary you will only get x8, however like others have said, there is not a great deal of difference, although the more powerful the card, the greater the difference but still very little.
     
  11. 2DividedbyZero New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    780 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    in retarded hell
    i wish there was definitive answer :confused:

    can someone confirm this for me though =

    if my 5970 was in a 16x PCIe lane, would each core take 8x 8x
    if my 5970 was in a 8x PCIe lane, would each core take 4x 4x

    if so, is it worth putting the card in the second lane(slot)? hence pointless going tri-fire?

    or are both lanes(slots) 16x (as the asus site says)
     
  12. micropage7

    micropage7

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,606 (3.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,584
    Location:
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    i guess when you put 2nd or 3rd card it doesnt mean it will read by core, it doesnt mean if you have 2 cores on that it will run on 8x, from system it will read as one graphic card no matter how many cores on one vga, and how about the performance of each it return on driver and the chip itself
    i guess like that. sorry if i made a mistake :toast:
     
  13. 2DividedbyZero New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    780 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    in retarded hell
    well, if/when i get a 2nd card, i shall run some tests and report back - hopefully the 5970 in the second slot won't be restricted. And despite what my wtb thread says, I want to put in a 5850 toxic - up clocks to 850/1200 to match the 5970 and hold my breath (for as long as the benches take that is :p)

    cheers guys
     
  14. 2DividedbyZero New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    780 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    in retarded hell
    well

    a little peek through my BIOS and I found the following information regarding slot#2 speeds, ACCORDING to the BIOS, slot 2 will be 16x as long as slot#3 is empty or x1.. well thats how I read it... take a look...

    IMAG0095.jpg
     
  15. de.das.dude

    de.das.dude Pro Indian Modder

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    7,970 (4.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,145
    Location:
    Mysore
    i followed TPUs article on comparing gfxs on different lanes by taping shut a couple of connectors
    may i know which connectors apply for the 1x slot??
    i'll try a ghetto mod probably to try and run my 4650 in the 1x slot hehehehehe
     
  16. 2DividedbyZero New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    780 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    in retarded hell
    :nutkick:

    :roll:
     
  17. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    40,504 (12.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15,203
    Nope, it dual x16. Two populated slots are x16 each. Three populated slots are x16 + x8 + x8
     
  18. blkhogan

    blkhogan New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2007
    Messages:
    2,314 (0.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    648
    Location:
    If I told u.. I'd have to kill u
    Thats how Im reading it. 1 card = x16 / 2 cards = x16 + x16 / 3 cards = x16 + x8 + x8. Either way with cards of the level your dealing with, your actual seen output change will be small at best. Its going to be smoking fast anyway you set it up. ;)
     
  19. Tatty_One

    Tatty_One Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    17,383 (5.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,105
    Location:
    Worcestershire, UK
    I didnt check the spec, he indicated that the 2nd slot was slower in the Op and was talking about whether the 2 GPU's of the 5970 would use 8 each in the primary.
     
  20. 2DividedbyZero New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    780 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    in retarded hell
    as i now have a 5850 toxic to tri-fire with my 5970, i CAN CONFIRM that both slots are PCIe x16 when populated :D



    I can also confirm that flashing a 5850 toxic with the 5870 toxic BIOS DID NOT WORK :shadedshu but to my surprise, the 5850 default core voltage was 1.162v (expected 1.088v according to the internets)



    I have bench tested and will post up tomorrow, but I will say that the only decent "big" improvement was seen in Unigen Heaven with 5970+5850.

    5850 on its own was very good, but 5970+5850, well, i expected better. I guess games will prove better in the near future when released.

    like I said, benches will be up tomorrow.
     
  21. 2DividedbyZero New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    780 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    in retarded hell
    here I go.
    Despite what i first thought, 3DMark11 and Heaven both showed good scaling imo.

    3 tests run

    3DMark11, 3DMark Vantage and Unigine Heaven

    config

    5850, 5970 and 5850+5970 (all clocks were 850/1200)

    rig
    (modest OC but i just want the cards performance figures)

    i7 980X @ 4GHz
    6Gb 1600MHz DDR3 6-6-6-18-48-1T
    850W Cooler Master PSU
    Asus Rampage II Extreme mobo BIOS 1914
    F40 SSD, 2x 640Gb WD Black RAID0


    screen shot of rig config: Capture.jpg


    TEST 1 3DMark Vantage


    5850............ P20245 - GPU Score 17570
    5970............ P32800 - GPU Score 31583
    5850+5970... P38719 - GPU Score 39236

    5970 gave a 79.7% performance increase (GPU Score) over 5850
    5850+5970 gave a 24.2% performance increase (GPU Score) over 5970

    screenies
    5850_V.jpg 5970_V.jpg 5970+5850_V.jpg




    TEST 2 3DMark 11


    5850............ P4718 - GPU Score 4425
    5970............ P8929 - GPU Score 8978
    5850+5970... P12205 - GPU Score 13243

    5970 gave a 102.9% performance increase (GPU Score) over 5850
    5850+5970 gave a 47.5% performance increase (GPU Score) over 5970

    screenies
    5850_11.jpg 5970_11.jpg 5970+5850_11.jpg




    TEST 3 Heaven 1920x1200


    5850............ Score 889
    5970............ Score 1758
    5850+5970... Score 2615

    5970 gave a 97.7% performance increase over 5850
    5850+5970 gave a 48.7% performance increase over 5970

    screenies
    5850_U.jpg 5970_U.jpg 5970+5850_U.jpg


    ignoring vantage and taking 3DMark11 and Unigine, the scaling looks spot on in my tests:

    102.9+97.7 / 2 = 100.3% scaling 5970 from 5850
    47.5+48.3 / 2 = 47.9% scaling 5970+5850 from 5970



    CONCLUSION

    Absolutely outstanding temps from the 5850 considering it is crammed up against the 5970 tighter than a nuns chuff, fan is "quiet" @ 57% max during tests and the 5970 fan is "inaudible"

    yeah, I'm happy.

    I know everything won't scale as well but it leaves me feeling hugs for my rig.




    last note to re-iterate what I said in the previous post, the 5850 DID NOT flash to 5870 unfortunatley but it did have 1.163v as apposed to 1.088v, plus 8+6pin connectors, i thought these cards awere 6+6, can anyone else comment on this?
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2011
    Jack Doph says thanks.
  22. 2DividedbyZero New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    780 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    in retarded hell
    heaven 2.1 v 2.5 benchies coming up...
     
  23. 2DividedbyZero New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    780 (0.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    in retarded hell
    apart from looking exactly the same (to me) a few differences in scores


    2.5 had a lot lower min FPS, and higher max FPS resulting in a higher overall score.


    both test run at the same system config (currently GPU's 875/1225 and CPU 4.33GHz)


    2.1 Scored 2717

    2.5 Scored 2817 = 3.7% faster (for me)

    Capture.JPG Capture2.JPG
     
    Jack Doph says thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page