1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Post your sunspider results thread

Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by james888, Nov 6, 2012.

  1. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,368 (3.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,512
    so i made this thread.

    [​IMG]

    This is SunSpider, a JavaScript benchmark. This benchmark tests the core JavaScript language only, not the DOM or other browser APIs. It is designed to compare different versions of the same browser, and different browsers to each other. Unlike many widely available JavaScript benchmarks, this test is:

    Real World
    This test mostly avoids microbenchmarks, and tries to focus on the kinds of actual problems developers solve with JavaScript today, and the problems they may want to tackle in the future as the language gets faster. This includes tests to generate a tagcloud from JSON input, a 3D raytracer, cryptography tests, code decompression, and many more examples. There are a few microbenchmarkish things, but they mostly represent real performance problems that developers have encountered.
    Balanced
    This test is balanced between different areas of the language and different types of code. It's not all math, all string processing, or all timing simple loops. In addition to having tests in many categories, the individual tests were balanced to take similar amounts of time on currently shipping versions of popular browsers.
    Statistically Sound
    One of the challenges of benchmarking is knowing how much noise you have in your measurements. This benchmark runs each test multiple times and determines an error range (technically, a 95% confidence interval). In addition, in comparison mode it tells you if you have enough data to determine if the difference is statistically significant.

    Test is single threaded. Please post which cpu you tested and clockspeed. Please shorted your link.

    Here is the test.
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2012
    Crunching for Team TPU
  2. brandonwh64

    brandonwh64 Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,555 (10.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,070
    Location:
    Chatsworth, GA
    Mine!

    Crunching for Team TPU
  3. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,824 (1.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    667
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    Core 2 Quad Q6600 isn't this a test of Internet speed lag through your system or something?

    Mine compared to OP...

    Not for sure what all these mean.

    [​IMG]


    EDIT: Samsung Galaxy S using WiFi compared to My Comp
    [​IMG]
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2012
  4. natr0n

    natr0n

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,869 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    955
  5. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,739 (1.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,044
    [​IMG]

    5 year old dual core E8400. 3.0GHz
  6. james888

    james888

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,368 (3.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,512
    I updated the OP with more info because I didn't know anything about this test. Lower is better.

    Please post which cpu you tested and clockspeed. Please shorted your link.



    I redid the test. Before I got 327.8ms on an i3-2330m. Now I got 242.3ms as shown here. My palm pre 2 got a score of 5222.3ms. I sure like seeing my laptops processor being comparable to older desktep processors. I do know this is not the best for comparison but...
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2012
    Crunching for Team TPU
  7. jihadjoe

    jihadjoe

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    385 (0.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    97
  8. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,412 (4.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,234
    can't seem to copy the URL it provided using Droid Incredible 4G LTE but the TOTAL = 1412.8 which makes it slightly faster than the Galaxy S3
  9. Completely Bonkers New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,580 (0.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    516
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2012
  10. brandonwh64

    brandonwh64 Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,555 (10.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,070
    Location:
    Chatsworth, GA
    That sunspider bench is dumb anyways
    Crunching for Team TPU
  11. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,178 (5.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,971
    Location:
    Home
  12. Mathragh

    Mathragh

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,059 (0.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    288
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Didnt expect to get great results, so i didnt quit any other stuff i've had running.

    Got 139ms, with my FX8120 @ 4415MHz. link

    I guess people should also say which browser they use, since the browser can greatly influence things. I'm on IE10
  13. helloWorld New Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2011
    Messages:
    177 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    32
    Location:
    USA
    102.0 ms
    2600K @ 4.8 GHz
    Google Chrome 23.0.1271.64, latest as of November 6, 2012

    [​IMG]
  14. KainXS

    KainXS

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,600 (2.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    501
  15. Novulux

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    150 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    30
  16. n!Cola New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2012
    Messages:
    2 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    193.2 ms
    Phenom II x4 @ 3.5 GHz / Chrome 22.0.1229.94 m / 35% avg. cpu

    after updating Chrome to 23.0.1271.64 m :
    186.1ms
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2012

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)

Share This Page