1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

PowerColor Radeon HD 6970 Pictured

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Dec 13, 2010.

  1. jpierce55

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,335 (0.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    91
    I don't disagree at all. I would much rather have a g-card a little slower using much less power. If it is reasonably cheaper you have to figure it needs a cheaper psu as well (less power).
  2. crow1001

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    365 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    29
    It will be over $150 cheaper than the cheapest 580.
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2010
  3. mdsx1950

    mdsx1950 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,107 (1.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    413
    Location:
    In a gaming world :D
    Proof? :shadedshu
  4. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,260 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,484
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
    The guy at OcUK (Gibbo) is inferring it will be substantially cheaper and readily available. I've said since launch that the 580 is pretty rare. I hope we see more but at the moment, it's in very limited supply.

    All that said, I wanted something to replace my 5850's and it's looking more and more likely it'll be NV as an overclocked 580 gets close/beats a 5970.

    Though since i changed my case my 5850's stay cooler and quieter when flat out. Maybe i should wait.....

    And it's not a 'fail' if it achieves AMD's goal. It's only us idiots that have hyped things so much we lose track of what good value and performance 'most' consumers want.
  5. phanbuey

    phanbuey

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,203 (2.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    973
    Location:
    Miami
    yes and no. The 5870 was king of the hill for a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNGGGGG time. It is only recently that it sits below a better card. For most of its life, the 5870 was up against the 285, which it butchered in terms of features and performance.

    Also, the 4870 was over 2x the speed of the 3870 and the 5870 was damn close to 2x the 4870. If the 6970 is too far off the generational improvement will be much smaller. It looks like a 30% increase on average over the 5870, which nixes any leadership that AMD worked so hard to gain...
  6. largon New Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,778 (0.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    432
    Location:
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Looks like the situation will be pretty much equal to pre-GTX580-launch era.
    nV has the fastest single GPU but AMD owns perf/$ and perf/W.

    And I think AMD being able to tweak Cypress -> Cayman and gain such boosts with minimal die size increase is actually an impressive feat compared to nV jury-riggin' GF100 -> GF110.
  7. phanbuey

    phanbuey

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,203 (2.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    973
    Location:
    Miami
    yes but fermi is not as old as Cypress, as far as actual mass-implementation so I feel like AMD has also had alot more time than GF100-GF110. Then again this could all be for nothing since we dont actually have drivers yet.
  8. niko084

    niko084

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    7,636 (2.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    729
    Tis why we invented water blocks :p

    Lets give up the Nvidia VS Ati trash for one thread maybe?
    Last I checked the title didn't say 6970 vs 580 benchmarks!
  9. largon New Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,778 (0.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    432
    Location:
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    nV had to spin GF100 three times (A3) before retailing it so that means something like a 6 month delay. There goes the time difference.
  10. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    I was hoping for a bigger leap from the 5870. I will reserve judgment until the TPU benches release.
  11. N3M3515

    N3M3515

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2010
    Messages:
    429 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    49
    OH MY god....
    Why are people so f***ing stupid? doesn't anyone READ?

    1. 6900's series is not a f***ing new generation, it's the SAME 40nm!!!, don't dream with 80% leaps!! IT'S A REFRESH!

    2. FAIL????......omfg......FYI AMD/ATI every new iteration, closes the gap to nvidia!
    HD3850 < HD3870 < 8800GT < 8800GTX
    HD4850 < GTX260 = HD4870 < GTX280
    HD5850 < GTX470 < HD5870 < GTX480
    HD6950 <= GTX570 < HD6970 <= GTX580 (acording to leaks)

    GET IT??

    PD: 1536 shaders and almost equal perf than GTX580!! Bravo AMD!
    PD2: could it mean they plan to release a 1920sp refresh part? who knows!, maybe it beats GTX580!!, maybe nv has a refresh planned aswell! (maybe overclocked because fermi's max shaders are 512)
  12. niko084

    niko084

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    7,636 (2.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    729
    Well before you start going into a tyrant let me inform you that the entire shader design between ATI and Nvidia are totally different.

    And yes, they probably will not see a huge performance difference, just some baseline design tweaks, which are indeed helpful.

    Lastly considering the release date of the GTX580, a refresh will not be coming for at least 6-12 months, if they even do one, by then ATI will most likely be ready with their next either refresh or design.
  13. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,541 (2.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    842
    dual chip cards from both camps coming soon, thats a beast waiting to happen.

    even if its only a dual GF104, that's going to be one frikken potent card. also very keen to see what AMD pull out in the way of a dual cayman.
  14. N3M3515

    N3M3515

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2010
    Messages:
    429 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    49
    Don't get me wrong, i was not being sarcastic about the 1536 shaders, bravo amd for making a gpu with less shaders than the 5870 and making it almost equal in perf to the GTX 580.

    Also, what everyone fails to see is that the jump from hd5870 to hd6970 is bigger than gtx480 to gtx580, again, acording to benchmark leaks.
  15. crow1001

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    365 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    29
    Yeah that jump is because the 5870 tessellation capabilities sucked ass, the 6970 corrects this but still it sucks in less tessellated games, for a card thats come out 15 months after the 5870, it's crap performance which the reviews will show. AMD are pricing this card way below the 580 because it does not compete.
  16. N3M3515

    N3M3515

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2010
    Messages:
    429 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    49
    I don't know how to explain it for you to understand my friend....it's FOURTY nm!!! 40!! what did you expected??? 50% over 5870??? dreamer!, and it's closer to the gtx580 than 5870 ever was to gtx480.
  17. bear jesus

    bear jesus New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,535 (1.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    200
    Location:
    Britland
    Could you direct the rest of us to this official information you must be quoting? :p

    Can't everyone just wait until the official reviews before saying how crappy and fail the 69xx cards are, I'm not saying they won't be but it would be nice for people to give exact examples of why they are so bad :laugh:
  18. crow1001

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    365 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    29
    Check the reviews out, 480/570 performance and it will win some and lose some, considering the 5870 was never that far behind a 480 it's pathetic, but I'll let the reviews do the talking.

    And you can cry 40nm all you want, the 6870 with a lot less SPs than a 5870 is almost on par with it, 40nm didn't hold that back.
  19. bear jesus

    bear jesus New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,535 (1.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    200
    Location:
    Britland
    What reviews? :p
  20. N3M3515

    N3M3515

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2010
    Messages:
    429 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    49
    You are the one whining, i don't care if it doesnt beat the gtx 580 i do care about price/performance ratio. that's what's important.

    MAYBE a 1920sp refresh part will beat the gtx580, but i don't think nv won't do anything about it.
  21. Red_Machine

    Red_Machine

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,723 (1.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Location:
    Marlow, ENGLAND
    Please don't capitalise and overuse exclamation marks and question marks. It's rather annoying, not to mention rude.
    N3M3515 says thanks.
  22. wahdangun

    wahdangun New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,512 (0.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    114
    Location:
    indonesia ku tercinta
    wow the fanboy wars really intense in every tech forum, can AMD release the card faster, because its look like it gonna be have a lot casualties from both side :cry:
  23. mdsx1950

    mdsx1950 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,107 (1.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    413
    Location:
    In a gaming world :D
    The only way to end the war is the benchmarks.
  24. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,824 (1.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    667
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    when does nda end? or what ever its called
  25. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,436 (11.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,620
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Sometime tomorrow (12/15).
    Delta6326 says thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page