1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Price vs Performance...am I spending too much?

Discussion in 'System Builder's Advice' started by Staxed, Jan 14, 2014.

  1. BarbaricSoul

    BarbaricSoul

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,122 (2.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,018
    for finding the best prices on hardware, I suggest using the PC Part Picker web site. You select the hardware you want to buy, and it price checks all the stores for what you pick and lists the prices at the stores, showing who has what you want for the lowest price.

    http://pcpartpicker.com/
    Staxed says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU 1 Million points folded for TPU
  2. Staxed

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Messages:
    10 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    so onto the GPU issue again that a few people have mentioned.

    I'm looking at the 770 that I had already selected (4gb version), for $370. A few people mentioned the 780ti...which from what I can see is $730ish? That is quite a big leap and not sure if it would really be worth that much of an increase for my purposes. Can the 770 play any current game at max setting easily? To start I'm going to be using 2 monitors 20+ inch, high res monitors...but may increase that to 3 later...so I guess that could be a reason to go with the 780ti as well.

    (Though, if I'm going to buy something that much more expensive...would the 780ti be a better choice than just going with a Dual 770 setup?)

    Thanks, that'll help a lot once I get my list finalized and start purchasing stuff.
  3. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,821 (3.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,480
    If you want to max out your games, then that performance really depends on the graphics card, so get the best. It won't break the bank, either.

    This is one is screamingly fast and whisper quiet, even running flat out, which isn't a combination that you often find. No wonder TPU gave it a 9.9 rating. Therefore, I recommend getting the recently reviewed MSI GTX 780 Ti Gaming 3 GB.

    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_780_Ti_Gaming
  4. Staxed

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Messages:
    10 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    The issue though is while I "want" to max out my games, I don't "need" to max out my games. High settings are perfectly reasonsable...it's hard to justify adding another $300 to the pricetag for that purpose alone. Hard to decide, lol.
  5. Durvelle27

    Durvelle27

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,484 (3.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    617
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    That's why i recommended a GTX 780 $460 and OC"d can max almost all games out excluding Crysis 3
    Staxed says thanks.
  6. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,821 (3.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,480
    Well, you said you wanted to play at "very high/ultra" detail which one would normally take to be maxed out, especially "ultra". If you don't want to max your games, then yeah, sure, go for something lower down and save some cash.

    In my personal experience though, you can never have too much rendering power when it comes to games, as motion smoothness is king. The new bar for this is 120Hz with a 120Hz strobing backlight monitor which looks fabulous, but this takes a lot of rendering power, especially for the newer games.

    There's no hard and fast to this though, so get what you feel comfortable with.
  7. HalfAHertz

    HalfAHertz

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,886 (0.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Location:
    Singapore
    For me the i7's hyper-threading is overrated for gaming and most software tasks. It's mostly good for rendering and video trans-coding. The i5k's usually overclock just as good and are much cheaper.
  8. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,936 (7.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,509
    Don't want to turn this into a car debate and I get what you are saying but a Corvette and a Camaro are for two very different types of racing. Ones a muscle car and the other is a sports car. Drag vs. Track. Different animals.

    A better car analogy would be a 770 is a GT Mustang vs Cobra Mustang (780).

    Play BF4?
  9. HalfAHertz

    HalfAHertz

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,886 (0.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Location:
    Singapore
    Nope I haven't but from the looks of it, it seems to be gpu limited. Even the low end bulldozers do 94+ frames.[​IMG]

    BF3 tho seems to like HT. Maybe they fixed that in BF4
    [​IMG]
  10. Durvelle27

    Durvelle27

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,484 (3.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    617
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    Your BF4 post is hilarious
  11. HalfAHertz

    HalfAHertz

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,886 (0.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Location:
    Singapore
    Fixed as in optimized their engine a little better :)

    [​IMG]

    according to tom's a stock sandy bridge i5 is almost as good as a hexa core( "12 core" with HT if you wanna call it that) IB. Seems it dipped under 60 fps for a bit there. But with a healthy oc, it quickly overcame that.
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2014
  12. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,936 (7.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,509
    An i5 with a large OC doesn't keep the FPS steady in BF4 man. HT is VERY useful with Frostbyte.
    Blue-Knight says thanks.
  13. shovenose

    shovenose

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2013
    Messages:
    797 (1.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    132
    Didn't feel like reading the entire thread, but:
    -Personally I would not buy a PNY video card. Not to say they suck, in fact if you want a Quadro card which is like $6K they're usually the only option. But MSI is what I'd recommend.
    -Good PSU selection. Seasonic makes a great product.
    -You're spending too much on the motherboard. Look for a cheaper one. I don't mean the $40 Foxconncrap ones but a mid range MSI build unless you're going to OC crazily but the i7-4770K is already not going to be maxed out a lot if ever.
    -If you've already decided on the case, fine. But there are less expensive options that are a better value.
    -Do NOT buy that monitor. Look for an IPS monitor, it's soooo much better you'll never go back. You don't need the touchscreen.
    -Make sure that Blu-Ray drive includes software. If it doesn't, find one that does include it, because the software is expensive.
    -WD makes better hard drives than Seagate, and you don't need an overpriced SSHD for secondary storage if you already have an SSD. I know it's not neccessarily cheaper but I would recommend a WD RE4 2TB disk if you really need the absolute best quality, otherwise a WD Black or even a newer WD Blue (though I don't think they make 2TB, but if you only need 1TB, the WD10EZEX is a fantastic drive on the cheap)...
    -Look on Amazon for a better deal than Newegg on some parts. Just make sure it says the order is being fulfilled, and the producti s being sold, by Amazon. Don't buy from 3rd-party sellers on Amazon!
  14. jcgeny

    jcgeny

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2010
    Messages:
    155 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    27
    cpu can run with ram at 1600 Mhz max , you loose [a max of] money buying a 1866 Mhz
    i buy at performance pcs in florida few rare things , they have better price than new eggs .

    i found two psu , that are $80 or $150 below your antec
    they are in this section : http://www.performance-pcs.com/catalog/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=1078

    950 w 80 silver or gold $142,48
    http://www.performance-pcs.com/cata...roduct_info&cPath=1078_1079&products_id=24947
    850 w 80 gold $85
    http://www.performance-pcs.com/cata...roduct_info&cPath=1078_1079&products_id=30689
    ppcs says no warranty but the product should be covered by brand in the us [ may be except OCZ that is bankruptcying ]

    i use gelid instead of artic silver5 @ $7.95 : http://www.performance-pcs.com/cata...product_info&cPath=46_58_1101&products_id=959

    http://www.performance-pcs.com/catalog/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=46_58_1107

    for the ssd try to find a Toshiba [ they buy ocz...] and for hard drive take a 2 or 3 To like a western-digital green that is very cheap and have 4ko clusters . [the ssd has 512 octects and most hdds ] . it s better mostly , apart technical aspects , because it is also the size windows uses when it format in ntfs .
  15. tigger

    tigger I'm the only one

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    10,183 (3.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,399
    Personally i would stick with the asus board, if you are spending that much overall, why not get a great board, which Asus are imho.
    Staxed says thanks.
  16. silentbogo

    silentbogo

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2013
    Messages:
    135 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    46
    Since everyone already offered to step up to GTX780, I would suggest to switch PSU to this one:
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817159114
    It has four 12V rails and almost $100 cheaper. My last PSU was a Coolmax 950W(Green) and it worked like a bull.

    Another thing - get 16GB RAM, but faster. It should be enough for everything you've listed, unless you are planning on running RAM disk(which is unnecessary with your SSD).
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231589

    Also $200+ for Z87 motherboard is definitely an overkill. I am personally inclined to buy this board:
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813157373
    I haven't purchased ASRock products since college. I had a nice Socket A MoBo back in a day, and it served well for over 5 years(maybe it is still somewhere in someones old rig). Lately I hear some really promising reviews about their motherboards.
    That's $122 vs $219.

    Total Savings: $312.
    You can get GTX780 for an extra $50.

    If you drop the hybrid drive in favor of regular HDD and switch Touchscreen with regular monitor - you could probably buy second GTX780!!!
  17. ZetZet

    ZetZet

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2013
    Messages:
    173 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    24
    Location:
    Lithuania
    That is singleplayer test, online tells a different story.
  18. Durvelle27

    Durvelle27

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,484 (3.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    617
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    [​IMG]
    HalfAHertz says thanks.
  19. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    9,923 (6.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,203
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    The 4GB version right now will not net you much performance, if at all, over the 2GB version, so its a bit of a waste. Jump up to a better all around card.
  20. thebluebumblebee

    thebluebumblebee

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,932 (1.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,452
    I hate Nvidia's nomenclature.
    I didn't recommend the GTX 780 Ti. I recommended the GTX 780, but I did point to the absolutely sweet MSI Gaming GTX 780 Ti. Quiet and powerful. Sorry if that was confusing.
    It's almost always better to get 1 (better)GPU than 2 (or more)(lesser) GPU's, unless you are the type that enjoys the eye candy that SLI brings.
    I was trying to point out that you are building a high end system and that the GK104 is actually a mid-range part, no matter what its performance is. Okay, that sounds real snobbish.
  21. leeb2013

    leeb2013

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2013
    Messages:
    154 (0.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    29
    I think your 770 4GB is a bit weak for such a system, considering you want the best parts. The 4GB is fairly pointless unless you SLI it and the 770 isn't so powerful. I would either SLI the 770 4GB or get 780ti or R9-290(x)
  22. Mathragh

    Mathragh

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,059 (0.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    287
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    On that budget, I'd also go for a more beefy card like the 780ti or perhaps an R9 290X with 3rd party cooler. Also, I wouldn't exactly shy away from lots of VRAM. While loads of VRAM might not seem all that usefull now; once new gen console ports come around you'll prolly need all the VRAM you can get, since both consoles have 8GB of (V)RAM and a big chunk of that will probably be spent on graphics performance. For console ports this means that unless you want to turn down a lot of graphics options, you'll also need lots of VRAM. You might also invest some time in reading up on Mantle and decide what you want to believe regarding its implications(just a suggestion, don't shoot me y'all).

    As far as your other stuff goes, you might want to switch out that samsung pro SSD for an EVO. Furthermore, for that price you can probably do quite a bit better on the CPU cooler front.
    Last edited: Jan 16, 2014
    HD64G says thanks.
  23. HD64G

    HD64G

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2011
    Messages:
    150 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    31
    R9 290 from me for GPU. Sapphire Tri-X specifically.
  24. craigo

    craigo

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Messages:
    655 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    65
    Location:
    Australia
    you may want to substitute the 4770k cpu for a non-k variant to support virtualization.
  25. Mathragh

    Mathragh

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,059 (0.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    287
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    If he does that, he might also just aswell go with a cheaper motherboard.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page