Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by newtekie1, May 19, 2009.
Danish it isnt the highest flops, its the average of all 5 runs.
BoT | Intel | Intel Q9450 @ 2.66MHz (Stock) | 35.8590
techjunkie, Intel, IntelCore2Quad Q6600 @ 3GHz, 38.6182
I seem to get higher results with an FSB of 375 than with 333, with the proc in both cases at 3Ghz. Is GFlops dependant on FSB given the same clocks ?
catulitechup | AMD | AMD Phenom X3 8450 Clock 2.1GHz Stock | 15.9165
A Cheese Danish | Intel | Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 @ 2.5GHz | 07.3217
*Will have my AMD rig up tomorrow.
Please Note that there is a new version of IntelBurnTest, 2.1, this allows you to select the number of threads to use. People with HT on might need to set the number of threads manually to get it to use the HT features.
Necrofire | AMD | Athlon X2 7750BE @ 3.1GHz | 17.1382
techpowerup.org is down for me
Will post atom @ 1933MHz when it finishes in a few hours
Necrofire | Intel | Atom N270 @ 1.933GHz | 00.3985 | Highest stable with 2GB corsair :/
The cores on a Q6600 communicate with each other through the FSB, so higher fsb is good.
Also you're probably getting more bandwidth from the memory, improving the score further.
BoT | Intel | Intel E4300 @ 2.4GHz (1.8GHz stock) | 11.5914
BoT | Intel | Intel Q9450 @ 3.2GHz (2.66GHz stock) | 44.1055
wow, what a difference 500MHz can make.
Record 32-bit or 64-bit
Record score per Ghz
Then we can see what cpus are more efficient per clock, and also if the 64bit code path is faster than 32bit
I'll see what i can score with an even higher fsb
Sounds good, I've updated the first post to reflect the new format to make entries with. I'll try to go through the original entries this weekend and manually update them with the missing information.
A Cheese Danish | AMD | AMD Opteron 170 @ 2.95GHz (2.0GHz stock) | 09.176
lemonadesoda | 2x Xeon E5420 @ 2.50 GHz | 58.67 | 23.47 per Ghz | 32-bit | CPU at stock, FB-DIMMs at 667
OP you should put the list in order so we can see what cpu's are getting what time more easily.
Yeah, if ya did away with the number on the left and just had them sorted by gflops it would be good
The thread's really taken off though, I didn't expect to see this many people so fast
Table Updated with new entries.
Click on any of the column headers to sort the table however you want, it is too much work to manually sort the table.
hoss331 | Q9650 @ 4.2ghz | 58.845075 | 14.01071 | 64-bit | max memory 3250mb
Alexrose1uk | Q6600 @ 3.4ghz |41.26856| 12.137812 | 64-bit | standard run
Temps are high as its pretty damn warm here today, and ambient temp is ~10 degrees C up from normal!
We need more PII 940/945/955 results I know there are guys running higher clocks than my system can.
Separate names with a comma.