1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Production of AMD "Piledriver" FX Processors Begin Q3 2012

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, May 24, 2012.

  1. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,181 (5.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,971
    Location:
    Home
    That is what I get when I skim through posts :shadedshu

    Well, there will always be fanboys everywhere, and aggressive weeding is needed every so often.

    Either way, AMD needs to boost their singlethreaded heavily to compete with Sandy Bridge past the $150 dollar mark, but I think AMD has given up in that segment and focus their resources in server and also low to mid end. Bulldozer while lacking in high end gaming does very well in mid and below, trading blows with the i3 and non-k i5 when overclocked. Power consumption still needs to be improved by 50% to make it truly competitive, no just on benches.
     
  2. Dent1

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Messages:
    3,148 (1.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    911

    Fair enough. But saying "upto" is misleading. Because upto isnt on average.

    Lets say we bench 20 games. Phenom II wins only 5 tests by a 15% lead, and Bulldozer wins 15 test by a 10% lead. Would it be fair to say Phenom II is upto 15% faster when on average it got spanked?


    Fourstaff, no offense taken. With all the fanboys around sometimes we automatically go on the defensive. I've been guilty of it myself.

    I agree singlethreaded performance needs to be improved heavily. Trinity is in the right step, as I pointed out earlier, Anandtech suggests a 20-25% gap between Trinity and Ivy in CPU. So hopefully AMD use this time to perfect the Piledriver between now and then to close the gap.
     
    Last edited: May 24, 2012
    Vinska says thanks.
  3. babash*t

    babash*t New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    74 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Location:
    Nairobi, Kenya
    Problem with sticking with am3+ is no quad channel memory
     
    TheLaughingMan and Dent1 say thanks.
  4. Vinska

    Vinska

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,411 (1.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,252
    Location:
    Kaunas, Lithuania
    On the bright side - mobos currently housing our bulldozers won't be obsoleted for a longer time.
    [warning! Some philosophical thoughts ahead!]
    I know that this has some bad implications, but let us not forget to always also look for the bright side. There is always two ends to a stick.
    That means "good" things also carry some "bad" implication. So, let's just be thankful for what we have - as in the first place, we have something ;]
     
    Dent1 says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  5. Dent1

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Messages:
    3,148 (1.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    911
  6. pantherx12

    pantherx12 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Messages:
    9,714 (4.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,699
    Location:
    ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
    My predictions !

    4 ghz stock speed ( top end model)
    +20% IPC

    5GHZ on air ( I can nearly do that already)

    Still will run as hot as BS but not AS hot as BS.
     
  7. Vinska

    Vinska

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,411 (1.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,252
    Location:
    Kaunas, Lithuania
    I don't get it.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  8. Hustler New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2010
    Messages:
    100 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    39
    Well I'm not really bothered about modern gaming anyway, the GPU is the biggest factor there these days, and when it isn't, your probably talking about the difference between 30fps and 33fps.

    I need raw single thread CPU performance because i heavily use emulators, which are usually not very multi core efficient, so IPC is by far the most important criteria for my needs.

    As much as i would love Trinity to match a 2600k on a clock for clock IPC, there is just too big a gap for that to happen by Q4 2012.
     
    Dent1 says thanks.
  9. babash*t

    babash*t New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    74 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Location:
    Nairobi, Kenya
    True, true
     
  10. Dent1

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Messages:
    3,148 (1.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    911
    Bear in mind Anandtech's assessment was based Ivy Bridge vs Trinity (20-25% CPU difference). The gap between Sandy Bridge and Trinity would be smaller maybe 15-20% taking a conservative guess. So it's not impossible to think a desktop Piledriver could be 10-15% faster than Trinity. Thus atleast catching upto Sandy Bridge (2600k) or on par. But yet being behind Ivy Bridge somewhat.
     
  11. babash*t

    babash*t New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    74 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Location:
    Nairobi, Kenya
    Well if they confirm the 10core vishera for desktop, and have it out and available by Q3/4 I don't think lack of quad channel will be a problem for me
     
    Dent1 says thanks.
  12. Vinska

    Vinska

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,411 (1.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,252
    Location:
    Kaunas, Lithuania
    10 core would mean 10mb L2 cache. I wonder, if the L3 cache would still be 8mb on a 10core/5module die. If handled well, a large L2 & L3 can reduce the amount of situations when 2-chanel memory would be a bottleneck, I think.
    That said, I have no idea if bulldozer handles its L2 & L3 caches well. Along with not remembering if cache handling improvements were mentioned in piledriver's improvement highlights. xD
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  13. pantherx12

    pantherx12 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Messages:
    9,714 (4.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,699
    Location:
    ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
    The processor runs incredibly hot when over clocked.

    I expect the new processor will run hot too.

    But not as hot.
     
  14. Vinska

    Vinska

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,411 (1.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,252
    Location:
    Kaunas, Lithuania
    Ah, thanks for clearing that ambiguity of Your previous post up. ^^^^
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  15. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,943 (4.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,065
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Hrm...curious....tell me more, tell me more.
     
  16. Vinska

    Vinska

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,411 (1.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,252
    Location:
    Kaunas, Lithuania
    Each time I hear about something new that sounds like it will be fiddling with the clock speeds behind the user's back, I frown.
    Many such things already made overclocking more and more confusing with each such additional technology. If this trend keeps up, in a few years time, overclocking can turn into "I don't even f-ing know if those changes I made affect anything at all". One such "bad" example of a chip getting near (bot not quite there yet) this territory is Nv Kepler.

    It will be a sad day, when overclocking becomes a thing comparable to "voodoo magic done by an amateur using a 'cookbook'.". :shadedshu
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  17. pantherx12

    pantherx12 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Messages:
    9,714 (4.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,699
    Location:
    ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
    That isn't what it does.

    "Electricity passes from the capacitor to the inductor, where it creates a magnetic field. When the capacitor’s charge reaches zero, the current flow reverses — power shifts from the inductor to the capacitor, and the magnetic field dissipates. This process is analogous to the movement of a pendulum or the sloshing of water in a tank, which is where the “tank circuit” moniker comes from.

    Here’s the key: It takes significantly less power to keep the pendulum swinging than it does to start over from a neutral position each and every cycle. Cyclos’ design reportedly cuts clock distribution power by “up to 24% while maintaining the low clock-skew target required by high-performance processors.” Cyclos claims that using its technology can cut total IC power by up to 10%. "


    Basically a power saving measure.

    Saved power also means lower temperatures.


    All goes towards them being able to clock BD higher.
     
    Vinska says thanks.
  18. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,399 (4.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,458
    for a lil easier explaination the inductor is a wire coil wrapped around a core core (the donuts on motherboards are a good example, Magnetic fields are called flux fields (Coils are used to step up or step down voltage/current in Transformers)

     
    Vinska says thanks.
  19. Widjaja

    Widjaja

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    4,819 (1.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    636
    Location:
    Wangas, New Zealand
    Can only hope AMD don't make Piledriver the chip which Bulldozer should have been which is a step up from Phenom II
     
  20. Syborfical New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2006
    Messages:
    86 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Did bench marks under linux means SFA to most people.
    People into PC wants raw performance on windows.

    The fact of the mater is bulldozer could be a 100 core CPU
    and still fail to deliver performance as it sucks compared to sandy bridge.
    It doesn't matter that is has 8 cores it still sucks. Although it may be cheap other than that if you want performance buy intel. Or AMD server chips maybe? Can you even buy them in the shops?


    Maybe AMD should Aim at being 80% as efficient as ivy bridge.

    First think they should do is fire all there marketing staff.
    Rename the FX to the Crap X or Cyrix :p.... Or just phenom 1.2 :p

    Then pull there head out of there backside and make something that is better than the phoenm2 its sad the FX isn't half as good as the phenom 2
     
  21. Vinska

    Vinska

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,411 (1.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,252
    Location:
    Kaunas, Lithuania
    pantherx12, eidairaman1 Thanks for clearing that up!

    Yeah, I know well enough about those things.
    Just from past experience, where companies used flashy (and highly indicating) names for simple things, just to attract as much attention from simple users as possible...

    ...Simply put, I thought this is one of those flashy sounding things that basically fiddle with the clocks in some clever way, which would prolly be frustrating to OCers.

    So, Thanks for saving me the trouble of long and boring Googe'ling (actually DDG'ing) session, and simply clearing things up for me! ;]
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  22. Vinska

    Vinska

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,411 (1.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,252
    Location:
    Kaunas, Lithuania
    Oh, please...
    To me is the reverse - most of my processor taxing tasks, and furthermore, processing intensive work & study related things are on Linux.
    So personally, bought bulldozer without too much thought because I hardly cared if it is slow on windows according to reviews, as it is fast on linux, according to reviews.

    As much as I encountered, people using linux in a serious way usually stay in their own communities and do not venture into places such TPU very often. Yet, they are quite numerous. Thus, I suppose You should fix that into "Most simple users into PC want raw performance on windows." ;]
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  23. techtard

    techtard

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    Messages:
    930 (0.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    204
    AMD fans should learn from the Bulldozer/FX launch. Don't get your hopes up. Too much hype will start another massive troll fest and flame war.

    For most average computer users AMD CPUs are perfectly fine, all they need to do is power the OS, web-browser and e-mail client.

    'Enthusuiasts' need to realize that they are not the only computer users, and not everyone needs the absolute best PC.
     
  24. Baam New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    Messages:
    93 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Location:
    Trucker..so all over
    I will be upgrading to this for sure.
     
  25. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,384 (2.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    565
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    :nutkick: Come on take my fin money already.....

    these should perform closer to sandy and ivy due to Fm3 support also :wtf: i hope








    beguiles me when i here this?

    im the average user ,my rigs listed ,my pc is folding for Tpu in the chimpchallenge(last ditch promotion:)) and is running 1520 threads at the minute, not gameing is doing my nut by the way, ive not been off ere at all>

    its sad someone taught you to use a keyboard
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page