1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

pureSilicon Debuts World's First 1TB 2.5-Inch SSD

Discussion in 'News' started by malware, Jan 10, 2009.

  1. malware New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,476 (1.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    956
    Location:
    Bulgaria
    pureSilicon is demonstrating the highest-density SSD available today: the 1TB Nitro Series. This represents a major advance for the storage industry since it combines maximum density with high performance and low power demand. Four of these drives deliver 4TB in the same space as a standard 3.5-inch HDD, so server footprint requirements and energy consumption in data-intensive applications can be considerably reduced.

    [​IMG]

    The 1TB Nitro SSD is the most compact SSD per gigabyte: 15.40GB per cubic centimeter in a 2.5-inch form-factor - at least three times greater than any other SSD on the market. This high density in a small form factor has been achieved through innovative engineering techniques coupled with advanced industrial design that yields an exceptionally thin enclosure.

    This Nitro line of high-performance solid-state drives is designed for applications where data throughput and power consumption are paramount: server, networking, datacenter, supercomputing, and professional media. These applications require fast transfer speeds and involve the storage of massive amounts of data. pureSilicon has benchmarked these drives at speeds approaching the maximum bus speed of SATA II (300 MB/s).


    Feature summary
    - 1TB SSD in 2.5-inch form-factor (highest density ever at 2.5-inch)
    - 300MB/s SATA II interface
    - Industry-leading performance
    - State-of-the-art industrial design
    Specifications
    - Capacities: 32GB, 64GB, 128GB, 256GB, 512GB, 1024GB
    Performance
    - Transfer rate: 300MB/sec
    - Sustained read: 240MB/sec
    - Sustained write: 215MB/sec
    - Random read (IOPS 4K): 50,000
    - Random write (IOPS 4K): 10,000
    - Latency < 100 µsec
    Reliability
    - MTTF: 2.0 million hours
    Environmental
    - Temperature (operating): 0°C to +70°C
    - Temperature (non-operating): -45°C to +85°C
    - Shock (operating): 1500G, duration 0.5ms, half sine wave
    - Vibration (operating): 20G peak, 10~2,000Hz, x3 axis
    Power
    - Active: 4.8W typical
    - Idle: 0.1W typical
    Physical
    - 2.5in form factor: 100.2mm x 69.85mm x 9.5mm

    pureSilicon has begun sampling its Renegade SSD units on a limited basis to select customers, with shipments expected to commence in the first quarter of 2009. The Nitro Series SSDs will be available in Q3 2009, pricing TBD.

    Source: MarketWire
    Mussels, mep916 and lollerskater69 say thanks.
  2. LittleLizard

    LittleLizard New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2008
    Messages:
    3,775 (1.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    575
    Location:
    Latin America, Uruguay
    2tb laptops on the way :D:D:D
  3. InnocentCriminal

    InnocentCriminal Resident Grammar Amender

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,476 (1.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    846
    Didn't take 'em long ay?

    ^^
  4. $ReaPeR$

    $ReaPeR$

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    142 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Location:
    Athens-Greece
    this IS nice
  5. a111087

    a111087

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,703 (1.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    188
    Location:
    US
    I bet this would bring prices down even faster
  6. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,485 (6.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,727
    Sweet, so now I can lose TerraBytes of data when the drive dies in two years.
    Roph says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU 25 Million points folded for TPU
  7. REVHEAD New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    300 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    28
    Location:
    Sydney/ Australia
    Very optimistic there, more like 12 months .
  8. Nick89

    Nick89

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,742 (0.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    176
    Location:
    The Nevada Wasteland
    I lol'ed :roll: I'll stick with a 2tb mag drive
  9. crazy pyro

    crazy pyro New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,662 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    125
    Location:
    Newcastle
    Fit needs one of these I think!
  10. kyle2020 Guest

    how quickly has this technology been developed? 2 or so months after the initial baby ones (36GB and so) were released, 1TB flavours are released . . . not bad, cant wait for prices to come down and reliability to go up!
  11. moto666 Guest

    You can lose 1TB of data with a regular HDD also if it goes bad after 2year's! :D

    But if you wish buy a 1GB HDD beside of the SDD to store your precious Data! (All your Porn and pirated films!) And for the system you can use the ultra fast SDD :D:D:D

    SDD is the future! :slap:
  12. PCpraiser100 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,062 (0.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    68
    Call now to get this SSD for only $10,000!!!!!!! :D
  13. DrPepper

    DrPepper The Doctor is in the house

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    7,483 (3.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    813
    Location:
    Scotland (It rains alot)
    Now that they have caught up with mechanical, They should focus on them not deleting your stuff after being used for a year.
  14. Jizzler

    Jizzler

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,271 (1.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    597
    Location:
    Geneva, FL, USA
    One year? Shoot, I'll be upgrading to the SSD that maxes SATA 6Gb/s :D
  15. tofu

    tofu New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2006
    Messages:
    484 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12
    Location:
    GTA
    Not bad for a large capacity ssd. MFT partitions can achieve about 15000 IOPS @ 4K write. There definitely will not be stuttering on this drive. Good luck on the price :slap:
  16. moto666 Guest

    The point is that if they make ever bigger SSDs the price goes down for the smaler ones! And I think that a 64 or 128GB SSD for the OS is more then enough! So in a year or so I sure that a 128GB SSD with Sata3 6Gb/s would be affordeble for us normal mortals!
  17. lollerskater69 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2008
    Messages:
    395 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    46
    I wouldn't fathom to ask how much that costs.....
  18. csendesmark

    csendesmark

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2008
    Messages:
    344 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    24
    Added to my christmas wishlist :D
  19. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,485 (6.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,727
    With an HDD, it is an if, with an SSD it is when.

    It is the future, but not in its current form. It won't replace HDDs until the write count is at close to that of an HDD.

    Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. As they make bigger SSDs, they just raise the price bar even higher. The smaller ones don't get cheaper, the bigger ones just get more expensive.

    The problem is that just putting the OS on the drive doesn't help performance in applications. The applications need to be on the SSD also, and right now my OS/App drive isat 200GB and growing with each new game that comes out.
    Crunching for Team TPU 25 Million points folded for TPU
  20. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,541 (2.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    842
    "Reliability
    - MTTF: 2.0 million hours"

    so the mean time to a failure is 2 million hours, (across all units made the same)

    1 year is shy of 9000 hours.

    they post MTTF because this unit is non repairable, but 2 million hours!

    how many times would you guys write and rewrite data anyway?

    personally im still waiting to hear the FIRST horror story of an expensive SSD dying.

    i was under the impression that using any electronics is in effect shortening its life, thus wouldn't everything be a matter of when not if? just a different time frame.
  21. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,485 (6.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,727
    2 Million hours is a made up BS number. They do the same with HDDs. I got tricked into that by WD with their 2 Million Hour MTTF "RAID Edition" drive. Only to have two of the three I owned fail well before the 2 Million hour mark(both failed within a year).

    SSDs are still new to the consumer market, give it about 2 more years and we will start to see people's drives dying.

    We are talking about roughly the 2 year timeline and the drives failing within that. With an HDD we are talking about if they die within 2 years. With an SSD we are talking about when they die in 2 years.

    Yes, using an electronic device shortens its lifespan, however with an HDD its life span is a random length and using it just randomly changes that to something else. With an SSD, you are working with a time bomb, the counter starts the moment you plug it in, and every write decreases the timer by one.

    Some say that the usable life of the current SSDs are relatively long(5-10 years), but others say they will start to fail and show signs of the flash memory failing after just 2-3 years.

    Personally, I would rather take my chances with an HDD that might never die, than buy a drive I know will die eventually. SSDs might be fast, but IMO they aren't worth it. Prices are still too high, and reliability is still too low. Especially with large drives like this which are meant to store data. I expect SSDs need about another 2 years before they will be an acceptable replacement for desktop drives.
    Last edited: Jan 11, 2009
    wolf says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU 25 Million points folded for TPU
  22. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,541 (2.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    842
    thanks newtekie nice reply, and i definitely understand that point of view.

    for myself hardware is on a very short lifespan, as are windows rebuilds.

    i would only buy an SSD for a windows/games drive (maybe raid) so if one or both lasted only say 1-2 years i could warrant replacing them, under 1 condition.

    THE PRICE COMES DOWN!!! gahhh theyre so expensive :ohwell:
  23. DaedalusHelios

    DaedalusHelios

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    4,916 (2.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    810
    Location:
    Greensboro, NC, USA
    Sadly, I don't think I could afford it. :(

    Anybody got an idea on projected price?
  24. R-T-B

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2007
    Messages:
    368 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    54
    "It won't replace HDDs until the write count is at close to that of an HDD."

    SLC drives already post acceptable numbers. It's these MLC drives that are the trouble, and even they are rapidly improving. At any rate, I'd still trust an SSD over an HD anyday, your more likely to wear out an HDs mechanics than an SSDs burn in with decent wear leveling.
  25. PVTCaboose1337

    PVTCaboose1337 Graphical Hacker

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    9,513 (3.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,142
    Location:
    San Antonio, Texas
    If I could afford this I would... But no body here really can.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page