1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

quad-core barcelona performance numbers

Discussion in 'Overclocking & Cooling' started by cdawall, Nov 3, 2007.

  1. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,683 (6.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    full reading=XS
     
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2007
  2. largon

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,780 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    432
    Location:
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    cdawall says thanks.
  3. magibeg

    magibeg

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,000 (0.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    203
    I feel somewhat unimpressed with the Barcelona so far, but what doesn't make sense is how much of a gain it gets from a small clock increase :-O
     
  4. nflesher87

    nflesher87 Staff

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    4,499 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    487
    Location:
    Texas
    that's the first thing I noticed
    2.0 ------ 2.4
    39s ------ 32s
    and that's just stock vcore, who knows, it may be able to go father with stock vcore let alone better cooler and more volts

    this is beginning to make me think AMD is going for the same effect C2D gave, not incredibly impressive stock speeds but crazy overclock-ability
     
  5. panchoman

    panchoman Sold my stars!

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    9,595 (3.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,200
    well i hope amd's going down the ocing road.
     
  6. nflesher87

    nflesher87 Staff

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    4,499 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    487
    Location:
    Texas
    me freakin too bro...otherwise this isn't looking good for them...
     
  7. panchoman

    panchoman Sold my stars!

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    9,595 (3.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,200
    cause while intel might be more expensive them amd at the same speed, i know the extra cash that intel charges will help me cause i can get juice out of that chip.
     
  8. magibeg

    magibeg

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,000 (0.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    203
    Well have to realize that Intel probably didn't plan on making their chips over clocking friendly, it just turned out that way. As far as over clocking at all sometimes we need to realize that we're only a small niche market and that they should be most concerned about speed at stock speed rather than worry about that 1 in 50th person that is going to oc :p
     
  9. DOM

    DOM

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    7,552 (2.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    828
    Location:
    TX, USA
    well its still slower then intel im getting 27.125sec @ 2GHz MEM 750Mhz 5-5-5-15

    so im thinking this isnt going to come close but I might be wrong I hope I am as its just like 2-3secs faster then the current AM2's :ohwell:
     
  10. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,683 (6.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
  11. DaMulta

    DaMulta My stars went supernova

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    16,119 (5.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,454
    Location:
    Oklahoma T-Town
    No 3dmark06:(
     
  12. DrunkenMafia

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2007
    Messages:
    2,277 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    232
    Location:
    Cairns QLD, Aussie
    That pi time is very similar to a E4500 stock... 2gig..

    Like everyone is sayin though, I hope they can oc like the core 2's can. And yes that is a huge decrease in pi time for the small oc... Could be promising :)

    Not long now though... Is anyone planning on getting one of those phenom chips on release day???
     
  13. [I.R.A]_FBi

    [I.R.A]_FBi New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,664 (2.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    540
    Location:
    c:\programs\kitteh.exe
    ona bad day @ 333 x 8 i get 21 secs ...
     
  14. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,683 (6.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    some more numbers for you :D
     
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2007
  15. b1lk1

    b1lk1 New Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    Messages:
    688 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    17
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    PI is meaningless for anything in real world useage. AMD has always suffered in PI while still maintaining the ability to do many other things very well. There are much more useful benchmarks to go by than PI........
     
  16. panchoman

    panchoman Sold my stars!

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    9,595 (3.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,200
    can we get a mark bench? (aqua,3d,etc.)
     
  17. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,683 (6.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    and drumroll please!!! 3dmark06!!!!!!!
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  18. panchoman

    panchoman Sold my stars!

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    9,595 (3.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,200
    10% less then kentsfield? ouchy, hope the phenoms aren't like that..
     
  19. v-zero Guest

    Those Pi times make sense, they're both proportional to each other.
     
  20. Tatty_One

    Tatty_One Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    16,740 (5.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,539
    Location:
    Worcestershire, UK
    Well if they are they are in trouble with Penryn around the corner!! Damn my old S939 4000+ was almost as fast as that best Barcelona run in SuperPI :eek:
     
  21. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,683 (6.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    the 22s run was done at stock speeds? i doubt you 4000+ came close to that
     
  22. DOM

    DOM

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    7,552 (2.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    828
    Location:
    TX, USA
    :confused: dont you mean the 39.750s 1M or the 3m 22.953s 4M cuz even a C2D at 2 GHz gets almost 1m less in the 4M run
     
    cdawall says thanks.
  23. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,683 (6.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    lol yea i missed the 3
     
  24. DOM

    DOM

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    7,552 (2.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    828
    Location:
    TX, USA
    lol I did to at first when you posted it ;)

    but I just hope the desk top cpus do better
     
  25. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,683 (6.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    lol yea or at least the oc like crazy :D
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page