1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

R600 benchmarks???

Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by EastCoasthandle, Dec 30, 2006.

  1. EastCoasthandle

    EastCoasthandle New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,889 (2.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,505
  2. DRDNA

    DRDNA

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2006
    Messages:
    4,778 (1.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    566
    Location:
    New York
    that link seems to go no where
  3. Frogger

    Frogger

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    2,180 (0.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    313
    works for me
  4. HeavyH20

    HeavyH20 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    Messages:
    407 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    37
    Not real. They did not even have a real 8800 GTX to test, either. Oh well, proof that if you publish, people will come. Looks like a good way to get some web ads sold.
  5. TooFast New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    391 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6
    Location:
    montreal quebec
    worked for me! ATI RULES GO ATI:rockout:
  6. Random Murderer

    Random Murderer The Anti-Midas

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Messages:
    6,425 (2.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,147
    maybe if they had some pics, i would believe it, but they didnt even have pics of the 8800 or 7950 or 1950's, so how are we supposed to believe them?
  7. DaMulta

    DaMulta My stars went supernova

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    16,119 (5.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,454
    Location:
    Oklahoma T-Town
    I believe a few developer cards are out there as of now. In which I would make a guess that this R600 in being one of those cards. I believe this review to be true the only thing buggy about it is that this is the ONLY thing at their site.
  8. DRDNA

    DRDNA

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2006
    Messages:
    4,778 (1.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    566
    Location:
    New York
    lol it loaded for me this time ...looks and reads like it right but i was expecting more ...this means ATI will be ontop for maybe best 45-60 days cuz I but the compitition already has better than that on the way ...OBL. was impressive though...and sure would like to see some crossfire scores:D
  9. HeavyH20

    HeavyH20 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    Messages:
    407 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    37
    Too funny. I guess the ATI fans will believe the scores since they are above the 8800GTX. The only problem is that the 8800 GTX numbers are way too low. So, if those were real ATI card scores, I would be disappointed. And, of all the sites that may have access to an ATI engineering sample, why such a little known, no reputation site would even get one is questionable. And, since the NVIDIA numbers are not even close, it even further invalidates the numbers. Simple BS site with BS numbers. Nothing more.
  10. DaMulta

    DaMulta My stars went supernova

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    16,119 (5.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,454
    Location:
    Oklahoma T-Town
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Those 2 are very close to being the same.
  11. HeavyH20

    HeavyH20 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    Messages:
    407 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    37
    Whether the results are close is not at issue. What is at issue is that the results are too low to be real. Also, just look ar the Croosfire numbers. What's with that? Those are very far off. And, I am not sure where you got the other 8800GTX scores. Is that with a QX6700 at 3.2GHz on a 680i board? Are they at HQ settings or the default quality setting for NVIDIA?


    [​IMG]

    With a QX6700 at 3.2 Ghz, the RAM at 800 Mhz, and the 8800 GTX card at stock clocks with HQ settings, 1600x1200, 4xAA and 16xAF, the real score is 7749 not 6368. So, their fake results are too low. I will have to try 05. Result to follow. Wish I had FEAR to test.
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2006
  12. DaMulta

    DaMulta My stars went supernova

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    16,119 (5.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,454
    Location:
    Oklahoma T-Town
    Do you have a bought copy of 3Dmark of 06 to run with AA/AF Heavy?
  13. HeavyH20

    HeavyH20 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    Messages:
    407 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    37
    All mine are bought. 01, 03, 05 and 06. And, if I recall correctly, 05 scores should be more like 12,500.
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2006
  14. DaMulta

    DaMulta My stars went supernova

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    16,119 (5.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,454
    Location:
    Oklahoma T-Town
    Wiz didnt even score that. Every setup will give slightly different scores from one setup to another.
  15. HeavyH20

    HeavyH20 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    Messages:
    407 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    37
    Depends on the CPU and motherboard used. Since I have the same setup the site tested, it is relatively easy to compare. And, we are not talking OC results, just stock (aside from the CPU). So, unless Wiz had a QX6700 and a 680i, it is kind of hard to compare like to like. All I know is the results from that site are off a little too much to be written off to simple variance.

    EDIT: Well, just ran 3Dmark05 with the cards at stock, HQ settings, 4xAA, 16xAF, 1600x1200 with the CPU at 3.2 GHZ and the RAM at 4-4-4-12 800MHz. The score was close to what I recalled, 12,326.

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2489187

    And, just ran 3DMark06 again and submitted the result, same settings as the review, 7742

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=891058
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2006
  16. xvi

    xvi

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,961 (0.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,102
    Location:
    Washington, US
    We'll have to see when the card hits the shelves and reviews from more well known sites start coming in.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  17. fanik New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2006
    Messages:
    33 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Czech Rep. - Central Euro
    2HEAVYH 3DMark06 1600*1280 / AA*4 / AF*16?????
    Score 7749???
    And driver settings? All for best performance? LOD +24?

    :toast:

    ///****censored**** top secret...
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2006
  18. cjoyce1980 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2006
    Messages:
    715 (0.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    i'm waiting for this card before i build my new pc, i can't wait........ R600 in crossfire, (think i've just creamed) :)
  19. xvi

    xvi

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,961 (0.69/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,102
    Location:
    Washington, US
    That's what I was wondering...

    Another point is that these are sketchy beta drivers versus nVidia's not-so-beta drivers. Expect the numbers to go up after real drivers come out.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  20. Paradox

    Paradox New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2006
    Messages:
    80 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Lebanon, Tennessee:
    It's fake, I have seen this before, they fake some tests and buy a Domain and stick ad's on it and submit it to the Tech sites and Bam. $1500 in Ad hits.
  21. EastCoasthandle

    EastCoasthandle New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,889 (2.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,505
    What ads :slap: :confused:
    I didn't see any ads at that website are you getting ads?
  22. HeavyH20

    HeavyH20 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    Messages:
    407 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    37
    Funny. :)

    No, all settings to hurt performance turned up to HQ. No LOD changes (0).

    Besides, with a little OC (630/990) and the driver settings set to performance, at the same 1600x1200 res and settings, the score is more like 8700. Without AA and AF enabled, 11K. At default benchmark settings, 13K.
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2006
  23. Paradox

    Paradox New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2006
    Messages:
    80 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Lebanon, Tennessee:
    Open it in IE.
  24. Casheti

    Casheti New Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2006
    Messages:
    4,422 (1.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    29
    YEAH YEAH YEAH !! w00t!!! ATi ROXXXXXXXXX
  25. ownage

    ownage New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Messages:
    84 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    LOL,

    fanATIcs

    Because this is mostly an ATI community website it means that its legal to be a fanATIc? :eek:

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page