1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Radeon HD 4770 Released, Industry's First 40 nm GPU

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Apr 28, 2009.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,258 (11.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,586
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    AMD today released the ATI Radeon HD 4770 graphics card. The release marks several milestones for the company, mainly winning the race for the first GPU to be built on the 40 nm process, and the introduction second-generation GDDR5 memory for the mainstream consumer segment.

    The brains of this card is the 40 nm AMD RV740 GPU. Its specifications include 640 stream processors that churn out over 900 GFLOPs of shader compute power, 32 texture memory units, and 16 render back-ends. The GPU is aided by 512 MB of fast GDDR5 memory across a 128-bit wide interface. This provides the same amount of bandwidth as 256-bit GDDR3 commonly found in most graphics card in the range. The card is DirectX 10.1 compliant, and supports the ATI CrossFireX multi-GPU standard.

    The card has been launched worldwide, with its initial US price set at $109, and an optional rebate that can send its price further down. In its range, it competes with NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT, and AMD's own Radeon HD 4830. TechPowerUp is one of the first technology portals to publish a thorough review of the Radeon HD 4770. Our review can be read here.

    [​IMG]
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2009
    air_ii says thanks.
  2. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,015 (11.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,405
    yay for 40nm!

    Good price too.
  3. HeadlessChicken New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2009
    Messages:
    62 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    nice, if i didnt already have a 9800gtx this would look very tempting.
  4. R_1

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2006
    Messages:
    449 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    39
    Good for ATI, good for us too.
  5. HTC

    HTC

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    2,237 (0.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    302
    Strange: before i saw W1zzard's review, i saw this one: take a look @ the power consumption in it.

    Then i read this one and i'm surprised by the huge difference in this aspect of the reviews. I mean: ~10 watts is one thing but there's a difference of 50 in idle and 49 under load.

    Dunno if there's a difference between the card AMD sent for W1zzard to test and the card of the other review.
  6. air_ii

    air_ii New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    128 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    POZ, PL
    Yeah, it is strange. If I remember correctly, I saw the same thing with reviews of HD4890.
  7. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,647 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,387
    different test system, different psu, different testing method. you realize those numbers are for THE WHOLE PC ?

    we'll soon have card only power measurements, waiting on a few last parts
    mdm-adph and HTC say thanks.
  8. HTC

    HTC

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    2,237 (0.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    302
    I see. @ first, i thought they were just measuring the card's output wattage but they were measuring the whole system.

    The difference is just too big not to notice and it struck me as very odd: thanks for clearing that up.
  9. air_ii

    air_ii New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    128 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    POZ, PL
    But different test systems may show large differences in total power consumptions, however, there should be a fairly stable delta between say 4770 and 4850. There can't be that much difference wrt CPU power consumption at the same situation across different GFX cards (although I'm sure there could be some).

    EDIT: the numbers that HTC linked to are also for the whole system.
  10. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,647 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,387
    exactly

    but our machine is different from what expreview has
  11. air_ii

    air_ii New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    128 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    POZ, PL
    Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to imply anything, I'm just trying to understand. So looking at the results, I'm guessing you're measuring the draw at the socket whereas they could be measuring at the PSU rails (given your systems are fairly similar). Then there could also be the issue of the PSU efficiency at low loads...

    All in all, numbers that other sites are giving seem more like it. Especially if you take into account that the 4770 needs only one six pin power cable, while the 4850 needs two.

    And thanks for the review, btw :)!
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2009
  12. Gzero New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2005
    Messages:
    718 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    52
    Location:
    Scotland
    Can't compare those power figures, TPU uses a completely different system, the overclock will also be different on the cpu. The PSU will have a different efficiency and the hdd is different.

    I think W1zzard's review has made it clear (at least to me) that the 4770 just doesn't cut it compared to the 4830.
  13. HTC

    HTC

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    2,237 (0.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    302
    Also, the drivers don't seem to be the same.

    Given the reviews thus far presented, i think it's early to say that.

    Besides:

    I'll wait for this.

    EDIT

    Found a page that links to a bunch of reviews.

    There are discrepancies with the power consumption in those as well: check AnandTech and HardwareCanucks, for example.
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2009
  14. air_ii

    air_ii New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    128 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    POZ, PL
    The only part I agree with is the PSU. HDD's power is negligible, really. CPU's overclock is the same in the two reviews (not sure about voltage, etc.), but fair enough, you can't compare it like that directly.


    This is the part I'm not convinced about. Although other sites (Anandtech, Hexus, to name a few) show approximately a 10W higher idle power draw, they present load power draw at some 20-30W less than on 4830...
  15. smartali89

    smartali89 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2007
    Messages:
    525 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13
    Location:
    Karachi, Pakistan
    for sure buy
  16. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,647 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,387
    our review shows something similar. higher in idle, lower under load. dont worry about 10 Watts here and there.

    to the one who said they could measure "at the psu rails" - if someone had the capability to measure like that, they would just measure the card alone. every site who measures "whole system" power measures at the wall
  17. ShadowFold

    ShadowFold New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,919 (7.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,644
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    On newegg all the cards are using the cheap looking cooler.. I don't doubt it, but it looks hideous.
  18. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,647 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,387
    check my review for what amd had to say, page 3 i think
  19. happita

    happita

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    2,355 (0.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    394
    I think now that it is on a smaller fab, 40 nm, it will surely overclock up to 4830/4850 potential speeds? I mean, look at the stock core clock of that on the 4850 vs. 4770, 625MHz vs. 750MHz ? That alone is an indication of how fast the GDDR5 is and with the help of controlling heat a bit better through 40nm process. (Basing all this info on TPU's review)
    I'm sure that you can OC the core clock even further to about 825-900 and memory clock to about 900-950, then you have a product that is in strong competition with other older 55nm cards. This is in direct competition with not only the 4830 like it says in the first post, but also with the 4850, which is supposed to be the best bargain for the buck. My 2 :D
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2009
  20. mdm-adph

    mdm-adph New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,478 (0.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    340
    Location:
    Your house.
    4850 just needs one. ;)

    I personally love just how small the stock 4770 seems to be, great for small cases.
  21. mamisano New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    43 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Over Here it shows power draw of the card, not the whole system.

    4770 is listed 15w less consumption at idle compared to 4830, 23w less than 4850
    4770 is listed 35w less consumption at 3D load compared to 4830, 60w less than 4850
  22. ktr

    ktr

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    7,407 (2.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    687
    I wonder how well this card scales in crossfire.
  23. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,258 (11.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,586
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Scales a nice 82% (all resolutions' average) from Expreview's findings. That's 20% faster than HD 4890, according to the same review.
  24. ktr

    ktr

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    7,407 (2.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    687
    That is shockingly impressive. You can get two 4770 cheaper than a 4890 and be 20% faster...

    I may just found my next pair of graphic cards (if I get around building a new rig).
  25. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,085 (4.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,377
    just remember dude these are the precursor of what is to be released either later this year or sometime next year, but yeah these are pretty decent.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page