1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Radeon HD 7970: Bulldozer vs. Sandy Bridge vs. Nehalem

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by W1zzard, Dec 29, 2011.

  1. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,788 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,490
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2011
  2. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,821 (3.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,480
    Excellent review. :toast:

    Unfortunately, Bulldozer is what it is and it doesn't matter what system you put it in, you get about the same results.

    I look forward to an updated version of this review once the Windows threading patch comes out.
    WarEagleAU says thanks.
  3. Wrigleyvillain

    Wrigleyvillain PTFO or GTFO

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    7,660 (3.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,767
    Location:
    Chicago
    Thanks
  4. Andrei23 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    243 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Nice review. but bulldozer is still a fail for gaming.
  5. Dj-ElectriC

    Dj-ElectriC

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,169 (1.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    825
    2500K, Chuck norris use this CPU.
    thanks for the megabench w1zz, i know how long and frustrating are all those tests
  6. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,514 (3.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,160
    Naah. It's slower than SB but holds up good against .. that older Intel chip. But yeah, if you're a hardcore gamer intel is the way to go.

    BTW, it would be awesome if Battlefield 3 was to be included there.
  7. TotalChaos

    TotalChaos New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2005
    Messages:
    737 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    590
    nice comparison looks like AMD still has work to do !
  8. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,788 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,490
  9. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,514 (3.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,160
    adulaamin and qubit say thanks.
  10. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,124 (1.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    575
    Very nice, thanks!

    A request? How about the same with with crossfire comparing FX and Thuban?
  11. Damn_Smooth

    Damn_Smooth New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,435 (1.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    478
    Location:
    A frozen turdberg.
    The results would be a minimal difference. It sounds like a waste of time.
  12. JustaTinkerer New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2011
    Messages:
    272 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    71
    Location:
    Scotland
    While we are on the subject of requests, any chance of doctoring the results so bulldozer wins something...anything, put in a category like "comes in a nice looking box" bulldozer might win something....make me feel better about my choice, and I only have the 8120!
    Cant believe the 920 beat it more times than not, only thing I want to play now is 3d mark 11 and that's not even a game...
    Could have saved my self some cash and just picked up a 920 for £80-90.
    This patch better be some kind of magic, Merlin himself better be writing it.
  13. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,838 (6.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,943
    I'd like to see this again, but this time with "modest" overclocks on the CPUs. Say the SandyBridge at 4.0GHz, the Nehalem at 3.6-3.8GHz, and the Bulldozer at 4.0GHz+.

    None the less, a very nice review, and really goes to show that upgrading CPUs isn't really a priority right now.
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  14. mediasorcerer New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    979 (0.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    225
    Location:
    coast ,melbourne
    Good bit of info,thanx.
  15. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,605 (5.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,238
    I think there was a review of this not long before or after BDs release. It showed that clock for clock. SB still beat the hell out of BD.

    you can overclock it but the performance gains wouldnt be anywhere near as big as Intels.
  16. fullinfusion

    fullinfusion 1.21 Gigawatts

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    8,118 (3.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,941
    The BD wouldnt show anything different then the review shows... There junk till about 4.8GHz and by that time your looking for a way to cool the bitch.
    And shows not to bother upgrading cpu's now.... only if you own a Bulldozer its time to upgrade :laugh:
    I wouldnt waste the man's time... It's more then a patch thats going to make this cpu shine. Toss it on the train tracks and after its rolled over and over is about the best it'll shine. :rolleyes:
    I 2nd that :)
  17. DrunkenMafia

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2007
    Messages:
    2,277 (0.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    232
    Location:
    Cairns QLD, Aussie
    :shadedshu

    I have a FX for gaming and its the best gaming machine I have ever owned. :) :rockout:
    Daimus, WarEagleAU and Lionheart say thanks.
  18. fullinfusion

    fullinfusion 1.21 Gigawatts

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    8,118 (3.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,941
    ^ sorry to hear that JJ :p

    you got that right...
    Look at the same clocks vs clocks...
    Bulldozer 8150 @ 5ghz
    [​IMG]

    Same clocks but on a SB 2700K
    Both systems had the memory speeds and timings as well as the gpu was 1000/1500MHz for both runs... SB Is a huge winner

    [​IMG]
  19. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,821 (3.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,480
    You muppet! :toast:

    Don't worry, you're not alone in this...

    Sure, it won't change dramatically, but I think it would be nice to perhaps have a quick version of it with just a couple of games out of interest, though.

    Toss it on the tracks, oh so cruel... lol
  20. fullinfusion

    fullinfusion 1.21 Gigawatts

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    8,118 (3.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,941
    lol but its true hahahahahaha :roll:
  21. karnak New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2008
    Messages:
    27 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Great article, but I would like to see a redux with eyefinity on all games. That would be interesting.
  22. Jstn7477

    Jstn7477

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,829 (2.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,518
    Location:
    Sarasota, Florida, USA
    It's interesting that in some games Bulldozer only seems to do good at 2560*1600 while being slowest on the rest of the resolutions. My only guess is that the card is taxed at that resolution, negating any CPU differences.

    Glad I went 2600K + Z68, as it looks like I shouldn't need an upgrade for a while. AMD and I had some good years, but the performance has been "meh" for quite some time. I know my 4GHz 955BE wouldn't be able to hold 120FPS in Team Fortress 2 on my ASUS VG236H, but my Intel does 98% of the time (if a poorly optimized map comes up or my system has been on for too long it does drop). I'd be interested to see how BD does in that game, as it is still very CPU intensive and doesn't like AMD CPUs too much it seems.

    Thanks for the review, W1zzard! Good to know I made a good investment. :)
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  23. Aleksander

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    3,254 (1.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    304
    Remove an if please :)
    Nice idea of making a review like this one
    I don't understand why sandy bridge with the core i5 is so powerful
    when it has less parameters showed in the table?
  24. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,250 (4.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,418
    That and the Revised CPU arch (Stepping) or Piledriver Arch)

    Bulldozer is far from a fail or horrible just many people blow it out of proportion (all fanboys which are blind anyway). (I do build AMD or Intel machines for clients, all depends on their budget)

    Tell you truth I really want to see Skulltrail 2 or FX dual Machines again
    BlackOmega and WarEagleAU say thanks.
  25. 1Kurgan1

    1Kurgan1 The Knife in your Back

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Messages:
    10,321 (4.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,371
    Location:
    Duluth, Minnesota
    Nice review, though would have been interesting to see a 100t in there just for comparison sake to the 8150, as I hear everyone saying that the PII's are faster.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page