1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Radeon HD 7970: Bulldozer vs. Sandy Bridge vs. Nehalem

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by W1zzard, Dec 29, 2011.

  1. INSTG8R

    INSTG8R

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2004
    Messages:
    2,807 (0.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    420
    Location:
    Lost in Norway
    Yep, rather interesting the only time BD pulls ahead(by a VERY small margin) is at super high Res. I am glad I went with my 2600K I mean look at the pic fullinfusion posted. I mean c'mon 1.54V to hit 5Ghz?? That is just pure silliness. It is already a power soak at stock as it is...

    Takes a brave man to pick up a BD and have aspirations of big overclocks. I really hope AMD fix this with Piledriver, I mean I said it when BD came out they should have just scrapped it and worked on Piledriver as that seems to be this CPU done right(if we are to believe the info we have)
    Granted I haven't been with AMD since my Opty 170 rig and it was great to the point that it still felt "snappier" than the C2D E6600 I replaced it with. After seeing this I KNOW I chose wisely with SB.
  2. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,213 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,140
    Awesome review and enlightening.

    Makes me glad I didn't waste my money upgrading to a bd. With 3.7 and 4.1 turbo I have the same clocks and it still works well for what I need.
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  3. PopcornMachine

    PopcornMachine

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,563 (0.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    459
    Location:
    Los Angeles/Orange County CA
    Very interesting comparison. Thanks for the review.

    Makes me even happier about just buying a 2500K. :D
  4. NC37

    NC37

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,183 (0.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    264
    Ya know, I'll just say. It is good that BD is at least delivering playable fps in those benches. Even if it doesn't win. I'll give it that much.

    Glad to see Hard Reset made the benching cut. Bout time. Great game and indie bunch. Knew from the demo that it would be a title I'd want to see benched.

    What I'd really like to see is a comprehensive upgrade guide. Take boards and setups from the last 5 years. Then run them on a stock set of benchmarks and list which should be upgraded.

    I know others do per year benching but each year they change the benches. Really if I want to know how a new system is going to run on say, L4D or whatever else...I'll want to see it. But you see it one year, then the next, gone. Yeah you know it will be better, but its still nice to see it. Metro has been one of the only titles I've been able to count on being in the lists. Glad it still is.
  5. Nirutbs

    Nirutbs

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2010
    Messages:
    34 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Location:
    Surin Thailand
    wow bull...nice thanks for review but sandy is better ..ie..ie:roll:
  6. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,126 (11.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,461
    question for ya w1zz: could you compile the results differently, so we have a DX9/11 comparison between the CPU's?


    basically its to see if DX11's multithreading changes the results, since we have so many DX9/poorly threaded games which could skew the overall result towards the intel CPU's, with their better performance per thread, vs AMD's more threads.


    edit: to make more sense, one of your 'total performance averaged out' charts, but one for DX9, one for DX11 titles.
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2011
    Daimus says thanks.
  7. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,754 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    538
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis
    Very nice review, thanks.
    Bulldozer does alright in higher resolutions. Not bad at all, hopefully AMD can enhanced, fix and tweak Piledriver so it can better complete with Intel.
    For me going with a FX-8120 was a big performance improvement over my late Phenom II, and it did not cost me an arm and a leg for the best Socket AM3+ mobo and Ram.
    Daimus and WarEagleAU say thanks.
  8. OOZMAN

    OOZMAN New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2011
    Messages:
    160 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    20
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Does that make his statement invalid? No. My rig is the fastest I've ever used, does that make it the fastest rig period?
  9. DOM

    DOM

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    7,552 (2.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    828
    Location:
    TX, USA
    why is the ram underclocked ?
  10. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,124 (1.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    575
    With the great memory bandwidth of BD, I think you'd be surprised.
  11. Damn_Smooth

    Damn_Smooth New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,435 (1.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    478
    Location:
    A frozen turdberg.
    Nowhere near as surprised as I was at the difference between SB and BD.
  12. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,824 (1.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    667
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    Great review! thank you for taking time out of your personal holiday's to make my day. :)

    Lol i'm still going to wait till either Ivy Bridge or later to upgrade my Q6600
  13. magibeg

    magibeg

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,000 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    203
    I'm especially impressed with the results of the starcraft 2 tests. CPU must really be a limiting factor with that game.
  14. ankan New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2011
    Messages:
    1 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    core 2 cpu comparasions

    How about comparing it with a core 2 quad cpu (e.g, Q6600 or QX9650)? Do I really need to upgrade the CPU if I play at 1920x1080 all settings max?
  15. theubersmurf

    theubersmurf

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
    Messages:
    870 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    101
    Location:
    Dawn
    Thank you for doing this review. It's nice to have reaffirmed with data what I suspected (and hoped really) that I had no need to replace my i7 920. I knew, but looking at actual numbers was reassuring.
  16. DanishDevil

    DanishDevil

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2005
    Messages:
    10,203 (3.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,090
    Location:
    Newport Beach, CA
    It's reviews like this that come out of nowhere that really impress me about TPU. Great work, W1zzard! :respect:
  17. H82LUZ73

    H82LUZ73

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,783 (0.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    265
    Location:
    Cobourg,Ontario
    Chuck who ? I think you need to read up on this guy he kicked his ass more than ounce :) Long live 'They Call Me Bruce'!!! Bruce would = the 2500k performance and stamina.:toast::rockout::respect:

    Great fun you had Wizz over the Christmas holiday.We gonna have a Crossfire one too?:respect:master reviewer :respect:
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2012
  18. Lionheart

    Lionheart

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2008
    Messages:
    4,037 (1.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    799
    Location:
    Milky Way Galaxy
    I was expecting BD to be shit, but it performed better then I thought, the cpu is not as bad as everyone makes it out to be ,candy bridge is still obviously the better choice ^_^
    WarEagleAU says thanks.
  19. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,244 (4.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,412
    If You think about it that is still less voltage than what a Athlon XP required even overclocked.

  20. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,668 (6.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,981
    Location:
    some AF base
    I wonder how many people can honestly see that few percent difference in the chips...
    WarEagleAU and Lionheart say thanks.
  21. AphexDreamer

    AphexDreamer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    7,089 (2.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    913
    Location:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
    My BD has been doing me very well and I have no regrets from it at all. I'd be interested in seeing a review when the Windows 7 BD FIX patch comes out and I like Mussle's Idea of an average split between DX9 games and dX11 games due to DX11's multithreading optimization.
    Daimus and WarEagleAU say thanks.
  22. INSTG8R

    INSTG8R

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2004
    Messages:
    2,807 (0.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    420
    Location:
    Lost in Norway
    Well that's just it isn't? Generations later and you'd think lower wattage would come with progress.
  23. theJesus

    theJesus

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2008
    Messages:
    3,967 (1.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    860
    Location:
    Ohio
    You're forgetting that the 2500K is cheaper. Seriously, I got mine and a Z68 board for $300 flat, brand new.
  24. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    12,244 (4.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,412
    so u want wine with that cheese lol
    WarEagleAU says thanks.
  25. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,782 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,482
    all benchmarks are dx11. except for hard reset and star craft II
    Mussels says thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page