1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Radeon HD 7970 Tessellation Performance Figures Surface

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Dec 16, 2011.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,713 (11.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,670
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Among the bits and pieces (read: slides) of AMD's press presentation that we're getting, a slide that's definitely missing is performance against competitive or previous generation graphics cards across a range of applications/games. Instead, there's a slide detailing tessellation performance improvements of the Radeon HD 7970 over the previous-generation HD 6970. On average, AMD is looking at about 1.5x (50%) improvements in the tests that it run. One has to also take in to account that the HD 7970 is a faster GPU overall, compared to HD 6970, and of course, that these are AMD's figures.

    [​IMG]

    Source: ComputerBase.de
     
    WarEagleAU, cadaveca and H82LUZ73 say thanks.
  2. pjl321

    Joined:
    May 19, 2009
    Messages:
    108 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12
    Little Worried

    I am not sure how well nVidia did in Tessellations but normally only the stuff that AMD want to get leaked actually gets leaked, from this i would read that the Tess improvement is 7970's biggest improvement.

    I hope i am wrong.
     
    Completely Bonkers says thanks.
  3. dieterd New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2011
    Messages:
    120 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    - and it better be like more than 50% faster because price is +50% :mad:

    Summary - this is bad news: AMD PR slides tell that this is only 50% faster in tessellation nothing else PR has to say to us? considering that this is one of AMD famous PR slideis - it is way less then what they say.
     
  4. gorillagarrett New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2011
    Messages:
    12 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Mate, looks like its 2.5x faster in tessellation on average and 60%-80% faster in those games.
     
    WarEagleAU says thanks.
  5. Completely Bonkers New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,580 (0.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    516
    Agree with pjl321. So AMD has added some additional tessellation units to try and catch up with nV tessellation performance. However, as we know, increased tessellation usually results in lower fps due to all the extra shading work that is needed for all those extra vertices.

    So the "selective leak" focusses on raw tessellation performance only for the WOW factor, because fps performance is lackluster.

    Well, if they get similar real world games performance as the 6xxx series but at half the power consumption on the new fab, then it's still a major improvement.
     
  6. air_ii

    air_ii

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    129 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    POZ, PL
    How did you come up with an average of 50% based on that chart, if all results are above 50% ;)?
     
  7. nt300

    nt300

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Messages:
    868 (0.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    159
    Location:
    Toronto, ON. Canada
    This is great news. Tessellation Performance looks good for HD 7970 over the HD 6970. The closer to launch the more we learn about HD 7970s true performance. Now give us some gaming benchmarks because I can easily see 50% or more faster than existing HD 6970.
     
  8. Zubasa

    Zubasa

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,980 (1.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    457
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    Because AMD's fail marketing tell's you its 50%+ so its most likely its less than 50% :laugh:
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2011
  9. Recus

    Recus

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    528 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    179
  10. entropy13

    entropy13

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,951 (2.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,215
    If it's all about tessellation alone:
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    That's current gen cards.
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2011
  11. gorillagarrett New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2011
    Messages:
    12 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2011
  12. entropy13

    entropy13

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,951 (2.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,215
    Honestly mate, Unigine is a benchmark too. But you make a sweeping statement about not trusting any benchmarking utility out there, mate.

    So what is it really mate? And besides mate, if you further check on Tech Report's revisions on their methodology, FPS isn't exactly the ultimate factor, mate.
     
  13. gorillagarrett New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2011
    Messages:
    12 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    I have not heard or seen this Tessmark utility used anywhere.The Unigine heaven benchmark has been long being supported by both vendors in their drivers, so it's a more standard and supported benchmark than this Tessmark is.

    Also, I'd rather wait for the reviews next week than argue these performance numbers...
     
    WarEagleAU and Horrux say thanks.
  14. buggalugs

    buggalugs

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    949 (0.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    152
    Location:
    Australia
    Looks pretty good to me. The tesselation performance jump from the 5870-6970 was much less than that.
     
  15. Damn_Smooth

    Damn_Smooth New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,435 (1.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    478
    Location:
    A frozen turdberg.
    I don't care about these marketing slides at all. I want these cards to be good simply so I don't have to wait a year for Nvidia. Unless that's changed. If Nvidia can release anywhere near the same time frame, I will go with whichever has the best price/performance. I can't wait for W1zz's review.
     
  16. Bundy

    Bundy

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,121 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    157
    It's great news that news cards are coming. I would not believe any of the current marketing though.
     
  17. treehouse New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    199 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14
  18. air_ii

    air_ii

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    129 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    POZ, PL
  19. Benetanegia

    Benetanegia New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,683 (1.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    694
    Location:
    Reaching your left retina.
    Yeah that's what people said about Bulldozer too and everything turned out to be true. Not saying it's going to be true with HD7970, but specs do not suggest more than a 30% increase anyway. Then the new architecture can improve performance per SP a bit, but the new arrangement* of cores might also actually degrade performance a bit, it's always posible.

    * In Cayman 16 shaders (4d VLIW) were directly inside a single SIMD unit and the SIMD unit was directly connected to the uncore.
    Now it's shaders (1d) inside a SIMD, inside a CU, connected to uncore. One more step that could or not degrade performance a few percents. The closest example of such an arrangement is Fermi, and it did suffer a substantial performance degradation from the new modular aproach, compared to the old arrangement. The benefits are very predictable performance increase and that scaling will never suffer as you increase the number of SMs (Nvidia) or CUs (AMD).
     
  20. air_ii

    air_ii

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    129 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Location:
    POZ, PL
    That's true (about BD), but if you constantly say something is going to be crap from a certain IHV, you're boud to be right sometimes ;). I'm not saying he's right or wrong, only that he's not a reliable source.
     
  21. Benetanegia

    Benetanegia New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,683 (1.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    694
    Location:
    Reaching your left retina.
    I only know him for his very early BD reports. At the time they seemd horrible and people said he was just a troll so I didn't believe them. Then the architecture was completely revealed with all details, I made my calculations, they seemed to support the idea that BD was not as good as it was first being reported. According to my calcs (10-20% faster than 2600k) it wouldn't be as bad as he was saying, but the huge difference between the hype and his numbers started to shrink. According to the specs and how resources were arranged and shared, the efficiency of each resource and IPC needed to increase by a lot in order to increase performance over previous gen. It didn't so in the end he was fully right.

    The pattern is similar this time, so I'm afraid that it could actually be true. This time is the reverse tho, I've known the architecture for a long time, but without knowing the specs I could not make any assuption regarding final performance, then the specs came in, then his performance numbers, but the effect is the same.

    With 2048 SPs you really need them SPs to be a lot faster/efficient than they were if you want the card to be significantly faster. It is fairly posible to have much faster SPs, but like with BD we again depend on a net "IPC" increase in order to get a significant performance gain. Since I don't want to believe in fairies again, I'm counting on SPs being fairly equal hence with 30% more SPs and 30% more TMUs and similar clocks, 30% performance increase is kinda the maximum I would expect. According to OBR numbers, net "IPC" or perf-per-shader might actually be slightly down and wihle it was not something I would have expected, it's not really something completely imposible.
     
  22. dir_d

    dir_d

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    848 (0.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    110
    Location:
    Manteca, Ca
    We also dont know if the CUs are locked to clock speed or they went with a more NVIDIA approach and sped them up. So there is a slither of hope, very slim though.
     
  23. Wrigleyvillain

    Wrigleyvillain PTFO or GTFO

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    7,669 (2.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,775
    Location:
    Chicago
    Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
     
    Makaveli says thanks.
  24. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,371 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,221
    Who cares about tessellation performance when the original tests on many things were done with tessellation being performed on surfaces that were not in the frame. I care more about the triangle/geometry performance than I do the ability to break them down with tessellation, you can't tessellate what you haven't rendered yet.
     
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  25. HalfAHertz

    HalfAHertz

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,893 (0.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    380
    Location:
    Singapore
    Meh... enough benchmarks. Show us some tessellated boobies!
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page