1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Radeon R9 290X Launch Date Revealed?

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Sep 30, 2013.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,713 (11.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,669
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    At a local press gathering in Turkey, AMD revealed the launch date of its next high-end product, the Radeon R9 290X. The press NDA over the card will end on October 15, 2013, at 12:01 AM EST (Berlin time). This NDA expiry time was disclosed in the slides that AMD showed the press. There's always the possibility that the NDA expiry date doesn't match market availability. It could merely mark NDA expiry for the press to post reviews of their AMD reference-design R9 290X (the only kind of R9 290X that will be initially available). AMD is handling R9 290X launch much in the same way NVIDIA handled the GTX TITAN, in that there won't be non-reference design cards in the foreseeable future, with the exception of cards with factory-fitted full-coverage water-blocks.

    [​IMG]

    Source: DonanimHaber
     
  2. gdubc

    gdubc

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2013
    Messages:
    37 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Location:
    Loveland Colorado
    Only a little over a couple weeks...I'm anxious to see what the price actually drops at.
     
  3. adulaamin

    adulaamin

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2009
    Messages:
    699 (0.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    261
    Location:
    Baguio City, Philippines
    :ohwell:
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  4. AsRock

    AsRock TPU addict

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2007
    Messages:
    10,998 (4.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,723
    Location:
    US
    I think it's a good thing as other company's with start making 3rd party coolers for them and less chance being locked to the one on your card.
     
  5. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    10,054 (6.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,270
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    The more and more I read about this card, the more I am unimpressed.
     
  6. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,478 (1.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    520
    If the design stays as reference then:
    1. The AIB's are just going to love AMD. No Windforce, No DirectCuII, No Lightning, No Vapor-X or IceQ.
    2. With no AIB factory specials that pretty much means as soon as the hoopla from the initial reviews is over the card won't be gaining much in the way of PR except for game graphics performance reviews...much the same as Titan.
    3. If that blower fan and shroud are going to be the face of the card through its production run would it have killed AMD to put some effort into making the card look less generic. A dual or triple fan shroud along the lines of the ACX, DCII, TwinFrozr, or Windforce can't be that hard to engineer surely. I don't think I've ever seen a squirrel cage that outperforms AIB designs.
     
  7. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    10,054 (6.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,270
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    780 and Titan coolers are FTW. :rockout:

    But really, I don't like the look of any of the new AMD cards in terms of aesthetics. Also All the cards look to be rebrands but 2 of them. the 290 and 290x.
     
  8. 1d10t

    1d10t

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2012
    Messages:
    193 (0.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    42
    if they restrict removing the cooler,than i might be waiting for AIB custom cooler or ditch it for 290 non X.
     
  9. SIGSEGV

    SIGSEGV

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    507 (0.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    107
  10. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,741 (1.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    980
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    That just dumb. While i do like exhausting coolers so the case stays cool, but those damn centrifugal fans start to rattle after 1 month if you use fan profiles like i do (very silent on idle, moderate noise on load at around 75°C). Usless. Current WindForce 3X works in the same way and it's still working perfectly.
     
  11. 1d10t

    1d10t

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2012
    Messages:
    193 (0.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    42
  12. Dj-ElectriC

    Dj-ElectriC

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,220 (1.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    845
    I wondered where DonanimHaber-AMD is, here they are...
     
  13. altechi New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    9 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    Australia
    Hmmm....

    The Titan-ish restrictions on the card is a downer. To be honest, I haven't been impressed with the reference coolers from AMD, hopefully they will improve that especially if the restrictions are true.
     
    EarthDog says thanks.
  14. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,463 (6.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,188
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    At far as my 6870s are concerned, one is reference and the other is a TwinFrozr. When they're clean, they both perform just as well. At really high overclocks with a lot of voltage, the reference design cools it a little better, but only by a few degrees. The real difference is that the TwinFrozr is a lot quieter than the reference design. By exhausting the air out from the back of the GPU makes sure that the GPU can stay cool, regardless of how good the airflow is in the case. Some cases have really poor airflow and exhausting the air itself is the best way to make sure it stays cool regardless of the thermal situation it is put in because the TwinFrozr, for the most part, recycles the air inside the case.

    I'm not saying that one is better than the other, it just depends on the conditions imho.
     
    RCoon says thanks.
  15. Casecutter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,167 (0.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Location:
    So. Cal.
    I don't know if such a "blurb" is worth a lot of discussion, like Titan and even the 7970 release, both companies feel it is the best way to keep rumors and leaks to a minimum. The 7970 released and it was like end Feb-March before AIB partners started showing the custom stuff. I think the words "foreseeable future" need clarification for both probability of translation or interpretation. Let's hope AMD better quantifies the statement before the 15th.

    Now if such news is accurate, AMD MUST deliver an exceptional blower reference cooler, at least as efficient and hushed as the Titan. If they don't and then hold-back on partners' offering customs that would be an appalling play by them. Do I care that reference coolers aren't always the utmost, no! Do I believe AMD should spend tons of R&D or impede launch or escalate the price on something its’ partners are there to add value with, heck no!

    Traditionally it's been a concession most first adopters have to weigh/decide, or wait a few weeks to see what AIB offer. That said if AMD is holding back from letting partners release within reason time-frame, AMD must deliver a cooler that is not wrought with compromise.
     
  16. PopcornMachine

    PopcornMachine

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,563 (0.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    459
    Location:
    Los Angeles/Orange County CA
    So, thought I remember them saying at the hawaii marketing fest that preorders would be taken starting Oct 3.

    If the cards aren't release until Oct 15, who in their right mind would order one based on the information now available?
     
  17. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,807 (13.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,190
    Not this guy. AMD seems rather disorganized. I'll wait for reviews.
     
  18. PopcornMachine

    PopcornMachine

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,563 (0.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    459
    Location:
    Los Angeles/Orange County CA
    Ding! Ding! Ding!

    What prizes do we have for our winner?
     
  19. m1dg3t

    m1dg3t

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    2,247 (1.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    513
    Location:
    Canada
    Funny how NDA is up on Berlin time... What you up to W1zz? :laugh:

    8008135?
     
  20. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,807 (13.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,190
    I hope it's a R9 290X!! :D
     
    PopcornMachine says thanks.
  21. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,744 (1.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,046
    No after market cards is really bad especially if priced at $600. There are quite a few GTX780 at around $660 which are faster than Titan out of the box and which are for sale since many months now. Add to this the fact that pre-order starts without reviews (I wonder if people will be able to know the price by then?!), the fact than "mantle" which supposedly will help 290X best Titan in BF4 will drop sometime in December (long after the dust will settle over the reviews) and all becomes a bit disappointing.
     
    The Von Matrices says thanks.
  22. Frag Maniac

    Frag Maniac

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2010
    Messages:
    2,643 (1.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    551
    There's really no in-between to reference and non reference. Adding more fans as you suggested would be equivalent to AMD themselves making it non reference.

    The whole point of the blower fan design is to place one fan at the end that blows the exhaust out the back of the case. You can't put more than one fan on a GPU without the added ones being propeller fans that just dissipate vs direct heat, which would just disrupt the airflow of the blower fan, limiting it's ability to exhaust the heat. So at that point you'd be better off just making them ALL prop fans with a non ref HS design.

    So ref or non ref, and I prefer a good non ref btw, there's really only one or the other.

    On a side note, an interesting and relating bit of trivia. I once asked EVGA if they'd ever make any non ref cooled video cards. At that time they said they had no plans to. Shortly after, they launched their first non ref cards. I then asked about one of the new models that was non ref, to see if they'd sent out any samples for review. The guy I spoke to insisted it would have roughly the same performance as their ref card, despite my suggesting their claimed 20c cooler temps might make it more OCable. His answer was that they only refer to stock speeds, making it clear they don't care about what is said regarding OC ability in reviews. Perhaps because it varies from card to card. EVGA is very conservative in stating their specs after all.

    Anyways, regarding ref vs non ref, obviously non ref has proven to be cooler (and quieter). I think the only reason they launch cards like these ref only is they need to be sure they'll get enough orders before they commit to the vendors that want to build such types, and that in turn can depend on the yields they (Nvidia and AMD) get with the chips. That might also mean AMD will authorize non ref designs much sooner than Nvidia on their Titan, because it will probably be priced a lot lower knowing them. Then again, AMD's customers are used to low prices, so it will depend on how low they can offer it at launch, AND how good their yields are of course.

    We're getting to the point now where between the die size and sheer power of these chips, the yield issue alone is more significant than it used to be. They're going to reach a saturation point with die shrinking unless the chip manufacturers can somehow make the process easier. I know Intel invested heavily in the use of Hafnium, and AMD even mocked their use of it once, but we all know Intel is the king of die shrinking.
     
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2013
  23. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    10,054 (6.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,270
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Sort of would have to agree. I mainly prefer reference do to the wider range of water blocks to choose from. Kind of why I got a reference 780 on launch day rather wait for non reference variants.
     
  24. The Von Matrices

    The Von Matrices

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,345 (0.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    445
    I suspect that as process advancement slows down the there will be a permanent move toward two GPU generations on the same silicon process; the initial one right after a shrink being with small dies and the one later in the process's life being with large dies. This allows manufacturers to avoid making large dies early in the life of a manufacturing process when defects are the most common.

    Case in point: Think of what NVidia did. They had lots of trouble getting GF100 (a huge die) to work in the early life of 40nm, and they similarly had to cancel the huge GK100 on 28nm and wait for GK110 a year later. AMD has never released a huge die early in the life of a process, and I suspect it's exactly for that reason. The last huge die AMD/ATI released was R600, and that was made on a pretty old (at the time) 80nm process while the smaller chips in the 2000 series were based on the new (at the time) 65nm.

    My prediction is that with their experiences on 40nm and 28nm both AMD and NVidia will initally favor small dies on 20nm to avoid defects. This will mean in 2014/2015 the AMD Rx 300 series & NVidia 800 series being only about 20% faster than the AMD Rx 200 and Nvidia 700 series, Then in 2015/2016 the AMD Rx 400 and Nvidia 900 series will be released with big dies on 20nm resulting in another 20% performance improvement. Everyone skipping upgrading this generation expecting a 50% performance improvement next generation is fooling themselves. Those days are over.

    I think this decidedly marks a trend toward marketing based on features rather than performance, much like AMD and Intel have done in the CPU space, and toward an increasing focus on software optimization to improve performance when hardware cannot advance.
     
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2013
  25. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,478 (1.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    520
    AMD's last release I believe managed the trick (well, as far as single card operation was concerned at least), and I'm pretty sure the card is considered reference.
    [​IMG]

    Reference does not mandate a blower fan, it's just that reference has become synonymous with that design partly because it represents a good trade off between function and manufacturing cost. Just to forestall the "But the 7990 is a dual GPU card" argument, so are the preceding HD 6990 and HD 5970.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page