1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Review Consensus: AMD FX Processor 8150 Underwhelming

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Oct 12, 2011.

  1. Covert_Death

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    308 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    thanks, sorry i guess i should have included more info...

    i run at 1920x1080 60Hz with two GTX460's in SLI OC'd quiet a bit...

    i also do a LOT of CAD rendering (mechanical engineering major) and im pretty sure i would see quiet a large benefit in this area as well...
  2. Horrux

    Horrux

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    735 (0.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    124
    Yeah, CAD is usually heavily threaded, so it looks good for you, I think.
  3. Dent1

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Messages:
    3,089 (2.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    884
    Single threaded 3D rendering performance is poor, but multithreaded 3D rendering in Cinebench the FX @ 4.6GHz seems on par with the 2500K @ 4.8GHz.
    Not sure if POV Ray is multi threaded, but FX 8120 @ 4.6GHz seems on par with the i5/i7 series @ 4.8GHz.

    http://www.hardocp.com/article/2011/10/11/amd_bulldozer_fx8150_desktop_performance_review/8
    Last edited: Oct 14, 2011
  4. Covert_Death

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    308 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    hmmm, looks very tastey... now to decide if i buy one now or wait for stepping revision or see if piledriver is AM3+....... decisions decisions
  5. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,344 (2.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    549
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    the futures starting to look rosey then since single threadeds on the decline and multithreaded processings on the up, i might go with an upgrade this xmass after all, i think a lot has been made of early benches on un optimised software and hardware and that new soft and games as they arrive that do use more then 1 - 4 cores things will start leaning AMD's way
  6. Goodman

    Goodman

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Messages:
    1,519 (0.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    324
    Location:
    Canada/Québec/Montreal
    Save your money & keep it as it is or buy an PIIx6 & don't ever look back ;)
  7. ensabrenoir

    ensabrenoir

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,168 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    183
    True yet you must also stay usable in the present or there won't be a future for you. We may all drive electric cars in the future. Hower there is not PRESENTly a large enough support infastructure for ford to only make electric cars . So the hybrid (gas & electric) exist until that future point.
  8. Covert_Death

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    308 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    And the fact that hybrids are more fuel efficient then electric ;) Electrics are still natural gas and oil vehicles in the long run, the engine is just no longer in the car but at a power plant.... hydrogen is the future as its only biproduct is water ;)

    Anyway, I'm not buying another pII when I already have one,, I wannt great multithread use since that's all I do basically ... I THINK bd is the answer for me, again unless pd comes quickly and is am3+
    Super XP, W1zzard and ensabrenoir say thanks.
  9. LordJummy

    LordJummy New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2011
    Messages:
    1,406 (1.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    248
    Location:
    US of A
    The future = magnets. Everyone knows this.
  10. Covert_Death

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    308 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    Once we can unravel a magnetic field yes haha
  11. MadClown

    MadClown New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,362 (0.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    108
    Location:
    NY, the state were you cant defend yourself
    well guess im not building a new pc just yet
  12. HalfAHertz

    HalfAHertz

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,886 (0.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Location:
    Singapore
    Just do AMD a favor and don't buy Bulldozer CPUs. Let them fry for a bit and shave some fat ...
  13. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,185 (2.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    283
    Not in the games it isn't. Don't take my word. Just check the charts from some pages before...;)
  14. Horrux

    Horrux

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    735 (0.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    124
    I thought they fried and shed the fat in the Phenom I days, and then some more lately? I'm thinking AMD looks thin and frail right now... They don't need to get on a diet, believe me.

    Just go look at their financials... :cry:
  15. Jack Doph

    Jack Doph

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    508 (0.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    109
    Location:
    Upright down-under (Brisbane, Australia)
    I'm pretty sure this thread has outlived its longevity...
  16. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,743 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    538
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis
    I believe it's been already established that Piledriver is indead going to sit on Socket AM3+. The future Piledriver II based on a 10 core design is said to be on Socket FM2 in around Q1 2013. But in reality, AMD can change there minds if they wanted.
    You got what I have a Phenom II x4 940 with a max OC of 3.60 GHz. Can't go over this number no matter what I do. I am due for an upgrade, but will hold off alittle longer for now.
    I believe Barcelona and it's launch was worst than Bulldozer. But AMD quickly resolved most of it's issues with Phenom II. Hopefully they can do the same with Bulldozer, such as a AMD FXII or something. But they would need a much wider performance gap between say original Bulldozer vs Bulldozer II. The PI and PII gap was good, just not as good, but not great. PII had the ability to clock higher.
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2011
    Covert_Death and Horrux say thanks.
  17. techtard

    techtard

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    Messages:
    930 (0.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    204
    They should ditch AM3+ for piledriver, and move on to the next socket. Break compatibility, and hopefully INNOVATE.

    Sometimes you have to break some eggs to make an omlette.
    I personally think that all this backwards compatibility limited their options. They had to design a brand new architecture, but force it to work with some old and tired components.

    Look at all the tinkering the motherboard makers are having to do to try to get this chip to run properly.
  18. DigitalUK

    DigitalUK New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    503 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    68
    Location:
    UK South
    you always break all the eggs when making an omlette?
    techtard says thanks.
  19. techtard

    techtard

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    Messages:
    930 (0.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    204
    LOL. Never been called out on that saying before. +1 for you.
  20. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,777
    Since when does the number of units they sell, and how, make any difference on the performance level of a chip? The reviews are about the performance. The way they are sold is irrelevant in that context.

    Defending the performance of a product based on where the majority of it's sales are based, does not make it a well performing product.

    BD = underperforming, period.

    Wrong. BD does not support DDR2. SO unless those boards sprouted DDR3 slots, AM2/AM2+ is out, period. Those chipsets can be made compatible if built on the AM3/AM3+ socket, not on current AM2/AM2+ boards.

    I have to agree. I really think it's time for them to move to a newer platform.
    Not if you buy carton eggs. :D
  21. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,114 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,125
    I'm buying a 1100T for my system today so I get the good chips before they are gone.


    I will send my 940 to my parents and get their X2 back for a cheapo build for a friend.


    Edit....I ordered it. $189.00 with free shipping....
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  22. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,759 (4.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,803
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    It's not like the offered performance prevents BD from completing any tasks, nor does it lack compatibility to run software, nor does it break anything. If it doesn't meet YOUR expectations, that's fine. Not everyone needs to have the fastest chip possible.

    When 90% of the chips sold aren't intended for users like you, you bet it's a viable excuse. You're just disappointed because AMD didn't have the capability of meeting the needs of both markets, but the market where the real numbers of chips sell do not have the same expectations that enthusiast do. Catering to those with the big bucks ensures they can have the funds to further reiterate on the product, as they have done countless times in the past.

    Don't forget, the Athlon/Phenom core design stuck around for like 8 years. BD will most likely last just as long as well.

    I mean really now, if AMD really had enthusiasts in mind, would enthusiasts be presented with a very limited supply of chips? I wouldn't be surprised to see AMD barely release any to retail as PileDriver is expected very soon. Where are teh BD chips AMD has been making, after all? Who got shipped chips first as a customer? Definitely not the retail space!!
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2011
  23. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,114 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,125
    Most of BD went to server chips. Plus AMD is making craploads more APU units than BD.
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  24. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,777
    None of that changes the fact that it doesn't even outperform the previous generation in some tests. It's a poor performer, and it got the reviews it deserved. No amount of "intended market" spin you throw on it changes that.
  25. Covert_Death

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    308 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    your words "in some tests"

    sooooo based on what your saying, if it excels in test that you would use on a daily basis then it is good for you. most of the test where PII did better was single threaded... and if you don't care for single threaded performance then why would you not buy it based on tests that don't pertain to your usage ?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page