1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Rydermark screenshots and video

Discussion in 'News' started by D_o_S, Feb 21, 2007.

  1. D_o_S

    D_o_S Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    979 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    38
    It looks like the Rydermark benchmark is just around the corner - the Inquirer brings us some screenshots:

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    A single Geforce 8800 GTX, G80 card under Windows XP and dual Athlon FX 74, Quad FX PC scores 217.11 in the test:
    [​IMG]

    And lastly, a new video has popped up (uploaded onto Fileshack by PC Perspective). It can be downloaded here.

    Source: The Inq
     
  2. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,797 (3.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    546
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    Wow, another thing to tell me, my system isnt so super fast ::rofl:: At least I can guage my ocing performance :)
     
  3. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    wow bet you i get a score of 50 on mine :p god the test looks insane
     
  4. KennyT772

    KennyT772 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2005
    Messages:
    3,585 (1.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    103
    hah they are using the quadfx with multithreading off....idiots.
     
  5. Xtant25

    Xtant25 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2007
    Messages:
    178 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    31
    Location:
    Tulsa,OK
    yeah saw that too makes no sence. Looks like a pretty cool benchmark though
     
  6. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,332 (2.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,200
    I believe this was the same company that called Nvidia out on the use of 16bit forced driver in the 7800 series. All for a higher benchmark, to give false higher performance in the 3D series over ATI who was using 24bit.
     
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  7. DanTheBanjoman SeƱor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    Exactly the first thing I noticed. It's nice to brag about specs, but if 75% of the cores aren't utilized it's rather pointless.
     
  8. Completely Bonkers New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,580 (0.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    516
    Pictures shown indicate bump mapping not featured :(
     
  9. i_am_mustang_man New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,854 (0.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    Location:
    Boston
    i wasn't that impressed. looks cool, we'll see how it is on my pc, but for now, 3Dmark is atleast much more fun :p
     
  10. mtosev

    mtosev New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Messages:
    1,463 (0.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    145
    Location:
    Maribor, Slovenia
    No Core 2 Duo?
     
  11. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,966 (6.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,047
    I noticed that multi-threading was disabled in that test, I wonder why, and I wonder how much it would have affected performance and the final score.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  12. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    they disabled multi-threading on a quad fx set up dumbasses :shadedshu
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page