1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Rydermark screenshots and video

Discussion in 'News' started by D_o_S, Feb 21, 2007.

  1. D_o_S

    D_o_S Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    979 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    38
    It looks like the Rydermark benchmark is just around the corner - the Inquirer brings us some screenshots:

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    A single Geforce 8800 GTX, G80 card under Windows XP and dual Athlon FX 74, Quad FX PC scores 217.11 in the test:
    [​IMG]

    And lastly, a new video has popped up (uploaded onto Fileshack by PC Perspective). It can be downloaded here.

    Source: The Inq
  2. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,796 (3.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    545
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    Wow, another thing to tell me, my system isnt so super fast ::rofl:: At least I can guage my ocing performance :)
  3. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,652 (7.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,972
    Location:
    some AF base
    wow bet you i get a score of 50 on mine :p god the test looks insane
  4. KennyT772

    KennyT772 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2005
    Messages:
    3,585 (1.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    103
    hah they are using the quadfx with multithreading off....idiots.
  5. Xtant25

    Xtant25 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2007
    Messages:
    178 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    31
    Location:
    Tulsa,OK
    yeah saw that too makes no sence. Looks like a pretty cool benchmark though
  6. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,121 (2.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,127
    I believe this was the same company that called Nvidia out on the use of 16bit forced driver in the 7800 series. All for a higher benchmark, to give false higher performance in the 3D series over ATI who was using 24bit.
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  7. DanTheBanjoman SeƱor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    Exactly the first thing I noticed. It's nice to brag about specs, but if 75% of the cores aren't utilized it's rather pointless.
  8. Completely Bonkers New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    2,580 (0.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    516
    Pictures shown indicate bump mapping not featured :(
  9. i_am_mustang_man New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,854 (0.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    Location:
    Boston
    i wasn't that impressed. looks cool, we'll see how it is on my pc, but for now, 3Dmark is atleast much more fun :p
  10. mtosev

    mtosev New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Messages:
    1,463 (0.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    145
    Location:
    Maribor, Slovenia
    No Core 2 Duo?
  11. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,726 (6.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,868
    I noticed that multi-threading was disabled in that test, I wonder why, and I wonder how much it would have affected performance and the final score.
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  12. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,652 (7.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,972
    Location:
    some AF base
    they disabled multi-threading on a quad fx set up dumbasses :shadedshu

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page