1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Sandisk CEO: ''Windows Vista not Optimized for SSDs''

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jul 22, 2008.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,847 (11.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,714
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    During a conference of the company's second quarter earnings, the CEO Eli Harari of Sandisk, a significant player in the solid state drive (SSD) industry said that Windows Vista would present a special challenge for solid state drive (SSD) makers. Says Harari: "As soon as you get into Vista applications in notebook and desktop, you start running into very demanding applications because Vista is not optimized for flash memory solid state disk,". He hints at the design of Vista as a cause for performance not being upto the mark, adding that Sandisk's next generation drive controllers should aim to "basically compensate for Vista shortfalls".

    "Unfortunately, (SSDs) performance in the Vista environment falls short of what the market really needs and that is why we need to develop the next generation, which we'll start sampling end of this year, early next year," said Harari. Ironically, he has also been quoted saying that such issues didn't affect the "very low-end, ultra low-cost PCs" (read ULPCs), where existing controller technologies could handle 8 ~ 32 GB drive capacities. Clever choice of words since that's the segment that has drive manufacturers, both SSD and HDD, eying at since it's an emerging segment.

    Source: CNET
     
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2008
  2. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,683 (6.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    so basically we get to see that M$ pushed out an unfinished product that wasn't up to par?
     
  3. newconroer

    newconroer

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    3,215 (1.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    350
    Sandisk is a laugh.

    MS could easily turn the table and say that SD's products are not flexible enough.
     
  4. [I.R.A]_FBi

    [I.R.A]_FBi New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,664 (2.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    540
    Location:
    c:\programs\kitteh.exe
    pointing fingers generally gets you nowhere
     
  5. Kreij

    Kreij Senior Monkey Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    13,881 (4.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,616
    Location:
    Cheeseland (Wisconsin, USA)
    It would help his cause a little if he shed some light on why Vista was not optimized for SSD.
     
  6. [I.R.A]_FBi

    [I.R.A]_FBi New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,664 (2.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    540
    Location:
    c:\programs\kitteh.exe
    Im betting he's reffering to the hundreds of reads and writes going on in the background by default
     
  7. mlupple

    mlupple New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    209 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13
    Location:
    USA
    It's the other way around. Sandisk's SSDs are not optimized for Windows Vista. How about releasing drivers like everyone else?
     
  8. hat

    hat Maximum Overclocker

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    16,952 (5.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,074
    Location:
    Ohio
    Drivers? For a hard drive? I've never heard about hard disk drivers, aside from RAID. :shadedshu
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  9. mlupple

    mlupple New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    209 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13
    Location:
    USA
    Then make them. AMD's not gonna bitch because their video card doesn't work the way they want it to natively in windows so they're going to make drivers for it.
     
  10. Kreij

    Kreij Senior Monkey Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    13,881 (4.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,616
    Location:
    Cheeseland (Wisconsin, USA)
    The controller (driver) is for the bus. Each bus on the motherboard uses a driver (IDE, SATA, PCIe, etc.)

    Sandisk SSD's use the SATA bus.
    Sandisk claims their SSD's can maintain a sustained read rate of 67MB/s.

    The Theortical limit on SATA 2 (3Gb/s) is 376MB/s
    On SATA 1 (1.5Gb/s) its 187.5 MB/s

    Both bus speeds are considerably higher than the sustained rate of the SSDs.

    That is why it would have been nice for him to drop a little technical info on his "Vista not optimized" statement. Where, exactly, is the problem occurring?


    Whoops ... found this. Vista's the problem ? Doesn't appear that way.

     
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2008
  11. Dia01

    Dia01 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Messages:
    498 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    54
    Location:
    QLD, Australia
    What's he mean "Vista is not optimized for flash memory solid state disk,". Vista recommends using a flash drive for ready boost. Scare mongering tactics, especially when the OCZ Core Series are offering reasonable priced SSD's at the moment, and that's in Australia!
     
  12. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,499 (4.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,330
    wake me up when SSDs are priced for the average consumer. then i will care.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  13. WhiteLotus

    WhiteLotus

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    6,553 (2.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    857
    i have to agree with this.


    and yea why chuck that statement out with no evidence.:confused:
     
  14. hat

    hat Maximum Overclocker

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    16,952 (5.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,074
    Location:
    Ohio
    Crunching for Team TPU
  15. [I.R.A]_FBi

    [I.R.A]_FBi New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,664 (2.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    540
    Location:
    c:\programs\kitteh.exe
    when i can get 2 120 gb ssd's for 100 dollars ill be interested
     
  16. Megasty New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,263 (0.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    Location:
    The Kingdom of Au
    Hardly worth a yawn. These giant flash drives have to come down to earth b4 normal computer shoppers like me will even turn an eye to this kind of news.

    The only funny part of it is how Harari is complaining about vista when its basically his drives which are too slow.
     
  17. TheGuruStud

    TheGuruStud

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,642 (0.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    173
    Location:
    Police/Nanny State of America
    I bet vista fails at SSD b/c it read/writes to it like a flash drive. Have you ever used a flash drive on vista? It's like using a 3.5 floppy. Actually, a 3.5 floppy is faster. But the interesting thing is that the perf. isn't completely abysmal using FAT, but using NTFS makes it so slow, it's literally useless. It would take an hour to load a multi-GB drive. I even remember trying to load just a few MBs of small files and it took 15 mins. Pathetic.
     
  18. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,117 (6.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,177
    This is exactly how it should be. It is either you optimize it for a regular HDD or a SSD. Microsoft optimized it for HDD's since that is what the large majority of users will have, and that will continue to be the case for long after Vista is EOL'd.

    Isn't up to par? I don't think "up to par" means what you think it means. Up to par means that it is at the expected standard. SSD's aren't anywhere near the standard. Why should Microsoft waste time optimizing their OS for less than 1% of their users. I think there are much bigger problems with Vista than SSD optimizations.
     
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2008
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  19. FatForester New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    971 (0.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    151
    What a useful post, enlighten me more!

    They're just trying to get people to buy their SSD's under the illusion that if Microsoft fixes their "problems" it will perform better. Yawn.
     
  20. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,484 (11.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,763
    my 2GB rally does 25MB/s, my 4GB imation nano does 12MB/s no matter how full it is, and my brothers 8GB manages around the 15MB/s mark (its on NTFS)

    i've never seen this USB problem you speak of in vista.
     
  21. TheGuruStud

    TheGuruStud

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,642 (0.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    173
    Location:
    Police/Nanny State of America
    consider yourself lucky
     
  22. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,484 (11.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,763
    give some details on the problem if you can, i'll try and reproduce it.

    I'm yet to see slow USB on vista, most lanners use vista x64 now around here and flash drives are the most common way of transferring files between us.
     
  23. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,117 (6.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,177
    Agreed, I've never seen this USB Flash Drive issue either.

    Besides that, Vista doesn't see SSD drive like Flash Drive, it sees them as a standard SATA drive.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  24. TheGuruStud

    TheGuruStud

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,642 (0.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    173
    Location:
    Police/Nanny State of America
    Maybe it's been fixed. I avoid vista like the plague ;).
    I just know that any ntfs flash volume took forever to write to.

    And don't get me started on file copy/delete lol. I've never waited 7 seconds to delete files that are tiny.
     
  25. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,484 (11.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,763
    the delete bug has been gone for a long time, it was in a hotfix, and permanently nuked in SP1.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page