1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ScienceMark thread (with score list)

Discussion in 'Overclocking & Cooling' started by _33, Jul 22, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. _33

    _33 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2006
    Messages:
    1,248 (0.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    31
    Location:
    Quebec
    Here are the latest scores found on ExtremeTech They might serve as a reference for your own performance score.

    DOWNLOAD

    Here is my score (first time bench):

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Aug 27, 2006
  2. _33

    _33 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2006
    Messages:
    1,248 (0.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    31
    Location:
    Quebec
    Newer score, lower memory bandwidth thoe. Can't win them all.

    Attached Files:

  3. tigger

    tigger I'm the only one

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    10,183 (3.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,399
    heres mine-[​IMG]
  4. Casheti

    Casheti New Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2006
    Messages:
    4,422 (1.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    29
    How long does a full benchmark take?
  5. tigger

    tigger I'm the only one

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    10,183 (3.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,399
    5 mins if that
  6. JdPower New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2006
    Messages:
    308 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    BEWARE: Newb question a'comin! haha.

    Whats this to benchmark for? Entire system? Sorry... :laugh:

    Jd
  7. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    Current ScienceMark 2.0 Benchmark Test Scores/Standings on 08-25-2006

    UPDATED


    **********************************************
    SCIENCEMARK 2.0 RESULTS 19/12/2006 "TOP 10" CLUB:
    **********************************************

    * 1.) dominick32 = 2386 (Intel Core2Duo E6700@4410mhz)

    * 2.) sirrah = 2288.30 (Intel Core2Duo E6400@4166mhz)[/b]

    * 3.) giorgos th. = 2224.21 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3903mhz)

    * 4.) alpha0ne = 2223.24 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3900mhz)

    * 5.) Devious = 2181.97 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3942mhz)

    * 6.) OneCool = 2165.41 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3900mhz)

    * 7.) DOM_ATI_X800XL_PCI-E = 2154.27 (Intel Core 2 duo e6400@3824.5mhz)

    * 8.) tigger69 = 2151.58 (Intel Core2Duo E6300@3851.4mhz)

    * 9.) Infrared = 2137.37 (Intel Core2Duo E6400@3700mhz)

    * 10.) IluvIntel = 2133.59 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3595.5mhz)

    =================================================
    TOP 10 AVERAGE RESULT =
    =================================================

    **************************************************
    SCIENCEMARK 2.0 RESULTS 08/25/2006 (ALL outside TOP 10):
    **************************************************

    * 11.) HeavyH20 = 2122.43 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3600mhz)

    * 12.) Boneface = 2100.29 (INTEL CORE2DUO E6400 @3850mhz)

    * 13.) VOCCH = 1971.06 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3500mhz)

    * 14.) g R 3 i F = 1944.00 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3402mhz)

    * 15.) MikeLopez = 1934.6 (Intel Core2Duo E6300@3290mhz)

    * 16.) Bonerheimer_c = 1905.22 (Intel Core2Duo E6400@3504.1mhz)

    * 17.) Heavyh20 = 1900.66 (Intel Core2Duo QX6700@3600mhz)

    * 18.) Chewy = 1897.74 (Intel Core2Duo E6300@3150mhz)

    * 19.) SixPack = 1862.31 Intel Core2Duo E6600@3300mhz)

    * 20.) BigBadWolf = 1834.06 (Intel Core2Duo E6300@3300mhz)

    * 21.) Lt_JWS = 1821.18 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3400mhz)

    * 22.) W2hCYK = 1813.82 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3300mhz)

    * 23.) LT Jws = 1799.60 (Intel Core2Duo E6300@3304mhz)

    * 24.) ixq = 1770.14 (Intel Core2Duo E6400@3640mhz)

    * 25.) HeUeR = 1745.07 (Intel Core2Duo E6300@3010mhz)

    * 26.) Pepsiaddict = 1736.57 (Athlon64 X2 5200+ @3000mhz)

    * 27.) speedycpu = 1702.46 (AMD Opteron 165@ 3204.7mhz )

    * 28.) mandelore = 1665.51 (Athlon64 4000+@3193.0mhz)

    * 29.) trt740 = 1662.43 (AMD opteron 185@3064mhz)

    * 30.) cadaceva = 1648.73 (AMD Opteron 170@ 3097.3mhz)

    * 31.) Judas = 1638.38 (AMD Athlon 64x2 4600+@ 2884mhz)

    * 32.) Ketxxx = 1622.16 (Athlon 3500+@2900mhz)

    * 33.) stevorob = 1614.95 (AHTLON X2 4200+@2800mhz)

    * 34.) _33 = 1584.73 (Opteron 165@2800mhz)

    * 35.) Wolverine = 1553.53 (A64 3700+ SD @ 3ghz (300x10)

    * 36.) Wile E = 1555.33 (AHTLON X2 3800+@2849mhz)

    * 37.) AthlonX2 = 1541.87 (AMD ATHLON 64 x2 3800+@2660mhz)

    * 38.) giorgos.th = 1541.53 (A64 3700+ SD @ 3047.02mhz(275.49*11)

    * 39.) Urlyin = 1537.93 (175 Dual Core Opteron @2800mhz)

    * 40.) Tatty_One = 1521.08 (Athlon 4000+@3100mhz)

    * 41.) DRDNA = 1504.98 (AMD Athlon 64 FX-57@3148mhz)

    * 42.) trt740 = 1502.73 (AMD Opteron 175@2757mhz)

    * 43.) pt = 1496.75 (AMD A64 3000+@2854.8mhz)

    * 44.) RickDStik = 1489.45 (Athlon x2 4200 @ 2.70GHz)

    * 45.) DRDNA = 1480.38 (AMD FX-57@3ghz)

    * 46.) mikek75 = 1478.24 (Opteron 165 2700mhz)

    * 47.) ace80 = 1467.87 (Intel Pentium 4 631@4957.1mhz)

    * 48.) Dj Dn = 1461.97 (Opteron 165 2700mhz)

    * 49.) X800 = 1459.10 (A64 x2 4800+ watercooled @2751mhz)

    * 50.) g12rxz = 1456.09 (AMD A64x2 4200+ @ 2.6ghz)

    * 51.) Tigger69 = 1448.51 (Pentium D930@4416.8mhz)

    * 52.) Alec§taar = 1440.60 (AMD A64x2 4800+@ 11x 257 = 2827.2mhz)

    * 53.) DOM_ATI_X800XL_PCI-E = 1429.10 (Intel Pentium 4 520@4410mhz)

    * 54.) lapenski = 1426.95 (AMD Opteron 148 @2860.4mhz)

    * 55.) JNT Raptor = 1422.72 (AMD A64x2 3800+@2712.1mhz)

    * 56.) 33 = 1395.99 (AMD A64 3000+@2856mhz)

    * 57.) trt740 = 1378.89 (AMD A64x2 3800+@2500mhz)

    * 58.) Ketxxx = 1374.96 (A64 3200+ @ 2.65GHz - VENICE

    * 59.) Lekamies = 1371.23 (AMD A64 3000+@2700mhz)

    * 60.) Steevo = 1360 (AMD 4000+ San Diego @ 3.0 1.65vcore)

    * 61.) mrbudgie = 1348.42 (AMD ATHLON 64 x2 4200+@2500mhz)

    * 62.) sno.lcn = 1342.76(Intel Pentium D930@4056.8mhz)

    * 63.) Greek = 1336.74 (AMD ATHLON 64 x2 4200+@2640mhz)

    * 64.) Ninkobwi = 1324.19 (AMD ATHLON 64 x2 3800+@2500mhz)

    * 65.) .:{KC}:. = 1313.31 (AMD ATHLON 64 FX55@2800mhz)

    * 66.) ace80 = 1290.8 (P4 630@4356.5GHz)

    * 67.) PVTCaboose1337 = 1285.43 (AMD ATHLON 3800+@stock)

    * 68.) i_am_mustang_man = 1284.06 (AMD ATHLON X2 4200+ @2.5ghz)

    * 69.) Wile E = 1251.20 (Intel Mobile core 2 duo T7600@2330mhz)

    * 70.) KennyT772 = 1243.51 (AMD ATHLON 3200+@2600mhz) (pending screesnhot)

    * 71.) wazzledoozle = 1236.07 (AMD ATHLON 3200+@2400mhz)

    * 72.) insect111 = 1232.80 (Intel Pentium D945@4025mhz)

    * 73.) zekrahminator = 1232.11 (AMD ATHLON 3800+@2699mhz)

    * 74.) blacktruckryder = 1227.88 (AMD ATHLON 3200+@2650mhz)

    * 75.) pt = 1216.14 (AMD AM2 Sempron 3000+@2500MHZ)

    * 76.) Canuto = 1208.45 (Pentium D 930 @3720mhz)

    * 77.) randomperson = 1208.27 (AMD ATHLONx2 3800+@2400mhz)

    * 78.) Alcpone = 1208.08 (Pentium D 945 @3777mhz)

    * 79.) Polaris573 = 1182.10 (P4 prescott@3.989GHz)

    * 80.) ace80 = 1163.96 (P4 550@3870.5GHz)

    * 81.) amd64skater = 1143.37 (AMD Athlon64 (NewCastle) 3500+@2420)

    * 82.) Okt = 1134.24 (Intel E6300@1.8ghz)

    * 83.) strick94u = 1123.30 (Pentium D820@3.6ghz)

    * 84.) newmodder = 1119.29 (AMD Athlon64 3500+ 205fsb x 11 mult)

    * 85.) cdawall = 1115.34 (AMD ATHLON64 3000+@2439mhz)

    * 86.) oily_17 = 1104.22 (Amd Athlon 64 3200+@2290mhz)

    * 87.) Thermopylae_480 = 1095.84 (P4 530@3699.9GHz)

    * 88.) jiggamanjb = 1090.67 (AMD ATHLON64 3000+@2679mhz)

    * 89.) Demos_sav = 1074.06 (Intel P4 519K@3.8ghz)

    * 90.) Polaris573 = 1040.76 (P4 Northwood@3.2GHz)

    * 91.) Polaris573 = 1016.19 (Amd Athlon 64 3000+@2350mhz)

    * 92.) W2hCYK = 1011.54 (P4 Prescott@3400mhz)

    * 93.) MikeLopez = 1000.03 (AMD ATHLON 3400+ (S754)

    * 94.) ATIonion = 994.96 (Amd Athlon 64 3200+@2419.7mhz)

    * 95.) Cdawall = 968.86 (Pentium D 930@3000MHz)

    * 96.) Paradox = 958.22 (AMD Opteron 165@1800MHz)

    * 97.) new_rez = 952.59 (Pentium 4 2.8 northwood@ 3.1ghz)

    * 98.) Cdawall = 942.11 (Celeron 351@4032mhz)

    * 99.) Cdawall = 939.94 (Pentium 4 ht @ 3.2ghz)

    * 100.) DaMulta = 937.81 (AMD ATHLONXP@2203.4MHZ)

    * 101.) Casheti = 931.40 (Pentium D 920@2800.80MHz)

    * 102.) Solaris17 = 886.72 (AMD ATHLONXP@2340MHZ)

    * 103.) Twinz = 852.66 (AMD ATHLON64 3700+@2532MHZ)

    * 104.) badboy_2912 = 757.4 (P4 Northwood@2.8GHz)

    * 105.) DOM_ATI_X800XL_PCI-E = 414.86 (Intel Celeron@1.7ghz)


    =================================================
    AverAge 95 non-top 10 testers =
    =================================================
    Post your scores on the wiki too:
    http://reference.techpowerup.com/ScienceMark_2.0_Scores


    Sciencemark was run on hundred and two computers and the comprovation screenshot posted here
    105

    P.S.=> Achilles from the film "TROY", said it best:

    :)

    ==================================================
    When you guys run the ScienceMark 2.0 test? Do it THIS way:
    ==================================================
    A.) Remove as MANY BACKGROUND APPS RUNNING AS YOU CAN, & even stop your EXPLORER.EXE SHELL using taskmgr.exe!

    * An example post of someone doing this is here you can refer to & follow, has details, for BACKGROUND APPS CUTOFFS OPTIMIZATIONS:

    http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?p=140138#post140138
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    B.) Stop as many services as you can using services.msc (or, via msconfig, whatever you are most comfortable with): You (@ least I can) can run with this MINIMUM SET OF SERVICES GOING (or just set ones you are NOT SURE OF, to MANUAL startup in services.msc):

    • DCOM Server Process (it may be possible to DISABLE this one, but some apps need it)
    • EventLog (may be possible to disable, but not 100% sure, because some security settings demand logging & if unable to log? System WILL shutdown!)
    • Plug and Play
    • Remote Procedure Call (RPC) - NEVER SHUT THIS DOWN or your system WILL LAG BAD!
    • Security Accounts Manager
    (Some of those? You may not even HAVE on XP, not sure anymore, but point is there! ABOVE ALL - If you are NOT SURE what to do here? Ask, or just don't do anything @ all... it can be 'somewhat risky')

    ** An example post of someone doing this is here you can refer to & follow, has details, for SERVICES CUTOFFS OPTIMIZATIONS:

    http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?p=140048#post140048
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    C.) Lastly/Optionally, startup ScienceMark 2.0 (using its File Menu, Run Submenu to browse for it if need be on disk) & try it @ HIGH, or ABOVENORMAL CPU Priority!

    (When you run it by rightclicking on it as you startup the program & it comes into taskmgr.exe's PROCESS tab view as visible, give the benchmark program THAT MUCH MORE CPU PRIORITY possible - then, RUN IT!).

    NOTE: When you are @ highest o/c's possible for your rig? It can get "touchy" using HIGH cpu priority, SO, if you can't finish the test? Step down to AboveNormal or Normal CPU priority via taskmgr.exe on ScienceMark2.exe!
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    D.) When done: Restart services you need, via service.msc right-click popup menu or START/STOP command there WHILE IN THE PROCESSES TAB, & restart explorer.exe (your desktop GUI shell) using taskmgr.exe's File menu, RUN submenu item. Then, post your CPU-z 1.36 data & score in photos in this thread. Thanks!
    ==================================================

    apk
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 4, 2007
  8. Lekamies New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2004
    Messages:
    152 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    -

    Attached Files:

  9. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,648 (7.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,971
    Location:
    some AF base
    my stock amd athlon 64 w/ ddr266 gets a huge 874.65!!!
  10. Boneface

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,492 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    84
    when i run it..it doesnt do the 1st 2 or 3 of them
  11. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    See system specs in signature @ bottom of post &...

    See my score here:

    [​IMG]

    :)

    * There is my results from this benchmark, with the system makeup below in my signature &/or specs panel...

    APK

    P.S.=> All tests ran to full duration & iterations of default tests as well for your reference... apk
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2006
  12. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    BRING 'EM ON!!! Break 1400...

    I've got THE fastest one yet overall submitted here @ least!

    :)

    (LOL: Hey, I KNOW YOU'RE OUT THERE)...

    * Bring on an Intel CONROE (Their highest-end one, preferably).

    If you can't, is there ones faster that have broken 1400 overall score, etc.??

    I don't know, I don't use this test typically!

    APK

    P.S.=> Coder built machine no less... I refuse to believe people here don't have one that scores better, there must be one - after all, you guys are the hardware nuts, not me! apk
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2006
  13. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    Achilles said it best in the film, TROY:

    [​IMG]

    "Is there NO ONE ELSE!?!"

    :)

    APK

    P.S.=> Come on now, if it comes down to me having to rib on you like that... break 1400! apk
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2006
  14. dj_dn New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    102 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Location:
    Canada, QC, Gatineau
    I broke it, 1446.18 I love my new system.

    Attached Files:

  15. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    "Very good Danielsan"

    :)

    (What took you so long? LOL...)

    EDIT PART - Now listening to Led Zeppelin's "Achilles Last Stand" lol, per the photos I used above...

    APK

    P.S.=> Hmmm, a ~56 point margin of error to beat, eh? I'll o/c when the heatwave stops, get out to near 2800mhz & beat that imo!

    I know I can get to 2728.1 or so, & all is stable except once I had a F@H mishap, so I stepped down some...

    I will try for my highest when it cools down ambient temps-wise... & try to once more O/C'd to that rate or more & try to beat YOUR score! Waiting out the heat & will try for more later... apk
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2006
  16. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    Remember I Said I'd Beat You? Here Is The Evidence...

    After a massive heatwave cooldown, I ran it, & this... was the unedited result:

    [​IMG]

    :)

    * Talk about "Turning up the turbo-boost & adding NOS"...

    APK

    P.S.=> I swear to God on my life that I did not edit that above either, it IS how it came out... apk
  17. {JNT}Raptor

    {JNT}Raptor New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    733 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Location:
    NY
    First glance has me thinking your OC Isn't stable.
    Or simply a glitch with the test on that run.
  18. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    It's a glitch on that run most likely, because it has not done a result like that since.

    I've run it 4 more times, always 'batting in' @ around the same as my first result (1388-1390 & I can't beat my original score @ my current overclock - so dj dn's rig IS the fastest thusfar).

    APK
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2006
  19. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    Here are my latest results, overclock is higher than I have ever run it here thusfar:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    :)

    * Here is my score, JUST SHY of 1400 (can't break it, & weather's TOO HOT to try for a higher o/c imo, @ least for this summer (topping 100F today around here))

    [​IMG]

    APK

    P.S.=> dj, I have to admit, you have a faster system than I do... that is, until I can try to pull off a still higher O/C, but I don't dare in this heat & to be blunt about it: I don't think I can 'take on' your Opteron 165 DualCore, no matter HOW far I o/c my rig... apk
  20. W2hCYK New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2005
    Messages:
    912 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    96
    that 165 is a denmark, right? My friend cant get it past 2.6GHz, and when he does that, it performs horribly.. ygpm. i need help. lol
  21. Boneface

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,492 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    84
    why wont it do the first 2 test for mine?
  22. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    No idea - does it feedback an error message, or do you system eventlogs show anything also?

    (Only things I can think of that MIGHT shed some light on your situation...)

    APK
  23. Boneface

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,492 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    84
    no error just doesnt do the first 2





    edit:tried again and its the same thing
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2006
  24. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    If you look @ the last page, I did a screenprint of a "glitch" the test ran into over here, & when that happened?

    The first test that does the spinning cube in black background & white borders as it rotates seemingly "hung up", but I still got a result from it on the molecular default test set... outrageous though it was!

    Does yours just NOT give you a result, whatsoever?

    There ARE "output files" from it as it runs, they are in .rst & .txt form & they are located under the ScienceMark folder itself!

    I suggest looking thru them for clues as to WHY you may not be getting results @ all!

    (Does your CPU do SSE2/SSE3 etc. as well as MMX/3dNow (if AMD the latter 2 should work no matter what, as well as x87 Assembly code streams)).

    APK
  25. Boneface

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2006
    Messages:
    1,492 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    84
    ok when i try to do the first 2 seperatly it tell s me that sciencemark has encounted a problem and the whole thing about it having to close

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page