1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ScienceMark thread (with score list)

Discussion in 'Overclocking & Cooling' started by _33, Jul 22, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    My latest score (via my latest overclock experiments)

    My latest score & stability (via ScienceMark 2.0) is as follows, having switched from using an 11x multiplier X 249mhz FSB to 12x multiplier X 231mhz FSB):

    CPU-z 1.35 CPU-mhz data (~2773mhz - a 373mhz overdriven gain):

    [​IMG]

    CPU-z 1.35 RAM-mhz data (~185/200mhz - a "ROI" of 93%):

    [​IMG]

    (This is w/ out setting my BIOS memory setting of RAS Precharge to 2, it is still 3 here but I used the older photo of it when I had it @ 2T for a test of what memory settings I can/could play with to try "tighten" them some more still yet)

    ScienceMark 2.0 score (increased from 1392 -> 1401.11 (my highest yet on 12x multiplier thusfar, & even almost beating my old mark of 1401.20 done on 11.5x "Fractional" & frowned upon multipliers + higher FSB @ 249mhz)):

    [​IMG]

    My BIOS data for overclocking used:

    LDT DATA:

    CPU HTT Frequency = 4x

    DRAM CONFIGURATION:

    CAS# Latency Tcl = 2
    Min RAS# Active Time Tras = 5T
    RAS# to CAS# Delay Trcl = 3T
    Row Precharge Time Trp = 3T
    Row Cycle Time Trc = 10T
    Row Refresh Cycle Time Trk = 13T
    Read to Write Trwt = 3T
    Write Recovery Time = 3T
    1t/2t = 1t

    JUMPER FREE CONFIGURATION DATA:

    O/C Profile = Manual
    CPU Frequency = 231mhz
    PCI Clock = 100mhz
    DDR Voltage = AUTO (cannot do over 2.6v on my RAM, tried it already 2x)
    Chipset Voltage = 1.6V (max)
    HT Voltage = 1.25V (max)
    CPU Mult = 12x
    CPU Volt = 1.5V (max)

    :)

    * That is about as good as I can get it... & WITHOUT using "Fractional Multipliers" as I did to bat off the 1401.20 I got using that...

    I can change 1 more setting in my "Ram Memory timing-chain" #'s down a notch (RAS Precharge 2T down 1 from 3T) that I know of, & don't "bsod" but, I haven't passed it thru the ScienceMark 2.0 test yet (it is a good test of stability here, especially for MEMORY imo!)

    APK

    P.S.=> I don't know about "kicking" cdawall from the tests, but cheating on this stuff is really ONLY CHEATING YOURSELF!

    If you do cheat it, you don't really get a GOOD IDEA of what your system can do by cheating on this test imo @ least, & thus only burn yourself... after all, there is ALWAYS some system that will beat yours in SOME capacity, if not this test, it will in others.

    This I already know!

    E.G. -> the Opteron 165 s939 CPU's "get the better of mine" here, batting scores like 1447 & 1500++ even already done by others here!

    I.E.-> The idea for me in this test is to achieve the MOST STABLE o/c I can in this heatwave, so I hit a "perfect" year-round mark to set it @!

    If it can stay stable & pass this test in this heat? It will FLY in the winter & it's colder ambient surrounding temps! apk
     
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2006
  2. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    "You KNOW the drill" (lol, it's "tradition" in this thread for me to do THIS):

    :)

    * This ScienceMark 2.0 benchmark test - it's MORE than just that! It's also a heck of a way to test your stability of an overclock as well (2 programs for the price of 1, and a FREEBIE no less to boot!)

    APK

    P.S.=> "Bring 'em on" guys, especially those of you with REALLY fast rigs, & hopefully? Intel CONROE's as well... can't wait for THOSE to appear, just to see how things stack up vs. them... apk
     
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2006
  3. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    het bs i did not set up the test for a mijic score i set up the test to get a correct score a$$hole
     
  4. {JNT}Raptor

    {JNT}Raptor New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    733 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Location:
    NY

    As far as I know...The test doesn't require any "set up" to run...simply open It and click on "Run all tests".

    I still think It has something to do with your Over standard HTT value.
     
  5. mikelopez New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    170 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
  6. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    Don't sweat it man... he was only speculating!

    :)

    * If you are "Straight up" w/ us on this test, or not, it's NOT a "huge deal" imo... but it'd only be cheating yourself imo @ least if you're not being straight up & rigging the test data!

    APK

    P.S.=> Man! Look @ MikeLopez's score there... it takes "top-spot" honors away from the Opteron 165 users test scores even here earlier @ 1446 & 1579 iirc... apk
     
  7. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    jnt i know that i just startede screwin w/ stuff after i ran all my test just ot see what options there were (after i ran the test at defaults) and after that i just went to see what other things there were (you know a longer test; a harder test etc.) and from what i can tell we all just got beat by the intel core duo so there you go
     
  8. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    Ok, fair enough - messing around w/ it is good to do, but we all ran the "test defaults" for our results...

    (See, you kind of HAVE to keep it that way! That is so we all are consistent & can compare our results w/ those of others!)

    We SURE did!

    :)

    * MikeLopez came in here today & SMOKED US ALL in this test, AND the SuperPi ones!

    APK

    P.S,=> Mike, 5ghz overclock over there or what, AND, is that an Intel CONROE result? apk
     
  9. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    the only time i changed anything was on page 8 when i got ~1k for a test result
     
  10. mikelopez New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    170 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    Indeed it is. Here is the validation link (which I already posted):

    http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=109515

    Cheers!!! ;)
     
  11. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    Friggin' AWESOME!

    You are the FIRST PERSON HERE on these forums running an INTEL Conroe, & that's the e6300 model... heh, wait until the e6800 ones appear!

    :)

    * I was hoping somebody would show up w/ one of those CPU's in this test... thanks man!

    STANDINGS SO FAR:

    MikeLopez 1637
    Urlyin 1537.93
    Dj Dn 1446.18
    Tigger69 1424.46
    Myself 1401.20 (via 11x mult. X 249mhz FSB)
    Myself 1401.11 (via 12x mult. X 231mhz FSB)
    33 1395.99
    Lekamies 1371.23
    JNT Raptor 1334.32
    cdawall 1030.50

    (Heh, my "Corvette" is surrounded @ this dragstrip by Porches, Ferraris, & Lamborghini's FOR SURE!)

    APK

    P.S.=> MikeLopez's new Intel CONROE result - Man Alive: It's a real "performance look @ the future" imo @ least... apk
     
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2006
  12. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    that and my what??? honda (LOL)it beat most of you but you think my old car cheated w/ NOS
     
  13. mikelopez New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    170 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
  14. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    Well, you admit to altering the test data used earlier, that much is certain! That alone sets things out of perspective man...

    Can't you see that?

    E.G.=> If I was told to pickup 52 cards & time it, and you are told to pick up only 24 cards & time it? Odds are, who is going to win??

    (That's basically what happens when you rig a test w/ diff. conditions to exercise man!)

    Plus, you also showed the SAME general scenario of error that my "SuperResult" screenshot did!

    (Albeit in a diff. part of the test - yours in Primordia, mine in Molecular)

    NOBODY can "beat that" result of 954520.24 of mine here to date, lol!

    Thing is?

    See... I KNOW that result of mine was b.s.!

    Mainly, because its progressbar flooded out of its groupbox boundary range (lesser of two evils) BUT MORESO, because my molecular test result was SO FAR AWAY FROM THE OTHER TESTS SCORES I HAD (too much variation, & they tend NOT to vary that much)!

    That's the MAIN CLUE, right there.

    (Yours was no different man... same clues showing us something is "off")

    Above all - This estimation of mine is nothing personal, because this is JUST a benchmark examination, but I have to admit I agree w/ the others in regards to your results because of those things...

    That's all.

    * Again - no big deal.

    (You did put on a good showing though for a system of your makeup, Honda or not... it's a good system imo because it can finish the test & be quite radically o/c'd & such!)

    APK
     
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2006
  15. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    ok i ahve redownloaded SET TO DEFAULTS and am currently running sciencemark let us see what we get!


    -edit ok got w/ a screen shot of primordia during the test just to make sure it seems to be a much more possilbe score
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Aug 3, 2006
  16. Urlyin

    Urlyin Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Messages:
    2,341 (0.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    128
    Another outburst like that and you won't need to worry about your mijic score... :slap:

    I think we have been more than fair to you...
     
  17. mikelopez New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    170 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
  18. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    Ah, wtf? lol... double post!

    Sorry!

    APK
     
  19. Alec§taar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,677 (1.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    94
    Location:
    Someone who's going to find NewTekie1 and teach hi
    Quite a variation MikeLopez...

    (Approximately 500 points worth!)

    Still, you ARE the leader via your massive overclock & Intel CONROE #1 here afaik... good showing!

    APK

    P.S.=> Well, in ANY event?

    I guess it's MikeLopez being able to say this (lol), now:

    :)

    apk
     
  20. cdawall where the hell are my stars

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    20,684 (6.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,984
    Location:
    some AF base
    sry urlyin it is just annoying to have ppl say you did something you didnt my bad it wont happen again as you can see it was prob just a bad copy of science mark that gave me the crazy score and now it is fixed w/ ~1k for a score
     
  21. Urlyin

    Urlyin Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Messages:
    2,341 (0.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    128
    Thks cdawall :toast: .... much appreciated :)
     
  22. Casheti

    Casheti New Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2006
    Messages:
    4,422 (1.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    29
    Ich bin ein stück scheiße
     
  23. Urlyin

    Urlyin Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Messages:
    2,341 (0.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    128
    Casheti ... why are you a piece of shit?
     
  24. Casheti

    Casheti New Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2006
    Messages:
    4,422 (1.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    29
    Because I am...lol...I feel like it every day
     
  25. tigger

    tigger I'm the only one

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    10,183 (3.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,399
    Dont Be So Fucking Wet!!!!!!!!!
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page