1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Share your AIDA 64 cache and memory benchmark here

Discussion in 'Overclocking & Cooling' started by itsakjt, Jun 27, 2013.

  1. d1nky

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    Messages:
    3,803 (4.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,323
    latest version had a bunch of optimisations fixed
     
    itsakjt says thanks.
  2. itsakjt

    itsakjt

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,179 (0.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    385
    Location:
    Kolkata, India
    Yes they are different. True. Previous versions were Intel biased in the cache and memory benchmark section. The software tested the Intel system with larger sized memory blocks and tested AMD systems with smaller sized ones. In the new 3.0 version, it has been eliminated and both platforms are tested with equal blocks of memory.
     
    James D says thanks.
  3. _JP_

    _JP_

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    2,684 (1.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    740
    Location:
    Portugal
    Current desktop.
    [​IMG]
     
  4. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,433 (6.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,846
    Location:
    Concord, NH
  5. drdeathx

    drdeathx

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,132 (0.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    479
    Location:
    Chicago burbs
    itsakjt says thanks.
  6. de.das.dude

    de.das.dude Pro Indian Modder

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    7,970 (4.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,145
    Location:
    Mysore
  7. _JP_

    _JP_

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    2,684 (1.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    740
    Location:
    Portugal
    Alright, my bad...

    Current desktop.
    [​IMG]

    Put the text in bold. It was so bland with all the thread I didn't even saw it.
    Also, if it isn't too much to ask for, please sort that table. It's hard to read as it is (space between entries) and if sorted by ascending/descending values, it's a complete mess.
     
  8. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,433 (6.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,846
    Location:
    Concord, NH
  9. d1nky

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    Messages:
    3,803 (4.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,323
  10. itsakjt

    itsakjt

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,179 (0.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    385
    Location:
    Kolkata, India
    Hoorah, those are just awesome scores drdeathx. :) And real nice overclock. Intel should brag about overclocking as well like AMD does.

    Thanks for the tips. I have made the requested text bold. But sorry for the table, it is the best I can get. And it is impossible to go through all the posts, study the data and make the entries in ascending/descending order. Hope you understand.

    @Both- Scores are added. :) Please check and verify. Thank you. :)
     
    _JP_ says thanks.
  11. _JP_

    _JP_

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    2,684 (1.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    740
    Location:
    Portugal
    You don't have to go trough all the replies again, just use the current data. The table sorts it out automatically, you just need to zero-out the numbers and delete the spaces.

    EDIT:
    Like this:

    User CPU model Read(MBPS) Write(MBPS) Copy(MBPS) Latency(ns) Overclocked(Y/N)
    1 itsakjt Phenom II X4 955 020878 011286 018047 51.8 Y
    2 Grnfinger i5 3570k 027543 028224 026896 47.3 Y
    3 PHaS3 i5 2400 018927 020438 018857 71.2 Y
    4 PHaS3 i5 3230M 018206 018371 017305 67.1 N
    5 HammerON i7 4770k 027499 037458 029687 43.3 Y
    6 btarunr FX 8350 019660 015693 016679 72.5 N
    7 Aquinus i7 3820 053241 062719 053767 49.5 Y
    8 DLGenesis i7 3820 032048 031881 030650 55.6 Y
    9 BiggieShady i5 3570k 024018 024667 023210 53.8 N
    10 LAN_deRf_HA i7 3770k 031730 032937 031165 38.3 Y
    11 natr0n Phenom II X6 1100T 021084 010664 018961 52.5 Y
    12 cdawall Phenom II X4 B97 018943 010027 016343 56.8 Y
    13 de.das.dude Phenom II X4 945 015371 007986 013464 60.6 N(timings tweaked)
    14 natr0n Phenom II X6 1100T 021705 010665 019332 51.0 Y
    15 Derek12 Celeron G530 008272 000000 000000 75.2 N
    16 Kursah i5 760 022449 019407 021074 55.7 Y
    17 marsey99 i7 2600k 031166 032828 031016 44.9 Y
    18 PHaS3 Phenom II X6 1100T 021206 009947 017658 53.1 Y
    19 erocker i7 3770k 031989 032606 030456 42.3 Y
    20 DigitalUK FX 8350 026043 020459 024349 57.9 Y
    21 brandonwh64 Phenom II X4 20? 011093 000000 000000 73.2 N
    22 erocker A10 5800k 024250 012935 020685 57.8 Y
    23 DLGenesis i7 3820 052940 060080 056125 50.4 Y
    24 itsakjt Phenom II X4 955 021045 011596 018094 51.5 Y
    25 cadaveca i7 3960X 064371 068892 061494 53.6 Y
    26 agent00skid Phenom II N830 013182 006586 010183 72.5 N
    27 puma99dk i5 3570k 023606 024374 022839 58.3 Y
    28 drdeathx i7 3930k 037949 038228 034180 76.2 N
    29 Delta6326 Core2 Quad Q6600 008021 000000 000000 86.8 Y
    30 Durvelle27 A10 6800k 020051 000000 000000 65.0 N
    31 klva80 i7 2670QM 019591 020447 019324 75.4 N
    32 kursah i7 4770k 030361 030851 026758 53.9 N
    33 PHaS3 2 x Xeon E5520 032848 023269 032637 75.7 N
    34 sampofin2 i7 3820 051715 064590 055344 51.5 Y
    35 Compgeke Core 2 Quad Q6600 003865 003854 003672 99.1 N
    36 klva80 Sempron 145 009910 000000 000000 57.1 N
    37 Compgeke 2x Opteron 2384 014629 012312 012965 96.1 N
    38 KapiteinKoek007 i7 2600k 023228 024728 023537 60.9 Y
    39 eviltwin125 FX 8320 027312 018373 024123 58.9 Y
    40 eviltwin125 FX 8320 027807 019549 024772 58.3 Y
    41 LAN_deRf_HA i7 3770k 035349 036916 034699 36.9 Y
    42 d1nky FX 8350 029885 020439 026330 52.2 Y
    43 kpo6969 i5 3570k 032255 032702 030735 52.2 Y
    44 drdeathx i7 3930k 051516 053841 047748 55.9 Y
    45 _JP_ Core 2 Duo E7400 006591 005677 005582 91.6 N

    000000 = TRIAL VERSION (Values could not be obtained)

    Now, if you click on each column header, it will be correctly sorted (except for columns without numerical values). (I already added an extra 0 to the above 10k values, because I don't know if DDR4+IB-E will be launched before AIDA64 3.10/3.20)

    EDIT2: You could just quote this post and copy the table as it is, if you want.

    EDIT3:
    Funny you should mention that but you didn't warn the OP about this rule...
    ...not really being enforced by the OP.














    Just messin' with ya (both)! ;)
     
    Last edited: Jul 16, 2013
    itsakjt says thanks.
  12. itsakjt

    itsakjt

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,179 (0.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    385
    Location:
    Kolkata, India
    Thanks a lot. The table is perfect. :) I quoted it and copied the entire table in the first post. However, the values are not arranged when I click the fields on the top. In your table it does that perfectly. I wonder what's happening. :p Any ideas?

    Update : I don't know why but I think parts of the quote are not getting copied. I just pasted the quote in a new post here(deleted it after seeing) and still those hyperlinks are not there.

    Update: Its working now. My internet connection was messing.
     
    Last edited: Jul 17, 2013
  13. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,433 (6.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,846
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    I assume the OP can take care of himself and can read the thread. Are you really trying to start an argument over something this trivial? :wtf:
     
  14. HammerON

    HammerON The Watchful Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,746 (2.96/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,867
    This ends here folks. Show scores or move along.
     
    Aquinus says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  15. Maleko

    Maleko

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Messages:
    62 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    53
    Mine

    [​IMG]
     
  16. Pixrazor

    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
    Messages:
    51 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Location:
    MADAGASCAR, Antananarivo
    here is mine:)
    [​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jul 17, 2013
  17. _JP_

    _JP_

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    2,684 (1.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    740
    Location:
    Portugal
    Laptop.
    [​IMG]
    Netbook.
    [​IMG]
     
  18. Grnfinger

    Grnfinger New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2008
    Messages:
    639 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    213
    Location:
    Canada
    New rig
     

    Attached Files:

  19. itsakjt

    itsakjt

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,179 (0.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    385
    Location:
    Kolkata, India
    Table is updated. :) Sorry for being late. Internet was down.
     
  20. itsakjt

    itsakjt

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,179 (0.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    385
    Location:
    Kolkata, India
    Present clocks.

    [​IMG]
     
  21. itsakjt

    itsakjt

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,179 (0.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    385
    Location:
    Kolkata, India
    Here I go again. CPU at 4.2 GHz.

    [​IMG]
     
  22. SonDa5

    SonDa5

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,645 (0.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    344
    Trial version run.

    [​IMG]

    My 24/7 OC.
     
  23. agent00skid

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    646 (0.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    524
    CPU@3 GHz

    [​IMG]

    I have no idea why the L2 cache is so slow. :S
     
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  24. itsakjt

    itsakjt

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,179 (0.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    385
    Location:
    Kolkata, India
  25. agent00skid

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    646 (0.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    524
    It's running custom CnQ via FusionTweaker. Aida doesn't read it correctly.

    So it is running at 3 GHz.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page