1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Small, High Resolution Windows Laptops Coming In 2012 - Thanks To Apple

Discussion in 'News' started by qubit, Nov 24, 2011.

  1. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,841 (3.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,490
    Location:
    Quantum well (UK)
    Love 'em or hate 'em, Apple has a habit of trend setting. When Apple released their original iPad, it had a meager low resolution 1024 x 768 resolution display which was scoffed at by many, yet it didn't stop it from being a runaway success. And the iPad 2 didn't improve on it, either – perhaps surprisingly, since the original formula worked so well. However, in early 2012 Apple plans to introduce its new Retina display equipped next generation iPads, offering a very high 2048 x 1536 resolution. On the 9.7" screen of an iPad, this would make the pixels all but invisible to anyone, except for those with the sharpest of 20-20 vision, giving the screen superb clarity and wow factor. These will be incorporated into its next generation iPads, which is expected to push the PC notebook market to use higher resolution displays too in order to remain competitive.

    One indication of this, is that Acer and Asustek Computer are, according to Digitimes, both working with "panel makers AU Optronics (AUO) and Chimei Innolux (CMI) separately to develop a new generation of full HD notebook panels with a resolution of 1,928x1,080, according to industry sources." Digitimes' sources also state that these new ultrabooks are expected to go one sale around Jan-Feb 2012 at the earliest and that both manufacturers are optimistic that these small computers will sell well. For comparison, Asus's 11.6" UX21 ZenBook model is currently stuck at a 1366 x 768 resolution - barely better than an iPad 2. This resolution unfortunately, is also common with larger laptops, too. However, with the new display panels, this should hopefully jump to a much more useful Full HD, 1920 x 1080 resolution.

    So, could this trend also rub off on desktop monitors, perhaps making 2048 x 1152 desktop monitors commonplace and inexpensive? It seems quite possible. The market has been stuck at a Full HD resolution for a while now and it's about time we saw a significant resolution jump.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 24, 2011
  2. n-ster

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    8,859 (4.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,405
    I love the idea of over 1080p on a screen smaller then my netbook's!

    I would have thought they would have gone with 1080p though
     
  3. theJesus

    theJesus

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2008
    Messages:
    3,972 (1.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    863
    Location:
    Ohio
    I loved having 2048x1536 on my 21" CRT and I love 2048x1152 on my 23" LCD. High res FTW.

    I don't know why they aren't doing 16:9 though.
     
  4. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,466 (4.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,268
    leave it to apple to push the boundaries!!!! if this were microsoft they would have just got around to 720p LMAO!!!
     
    AthlonX2 says thanks.
  5. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,063 (6.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,122
    A higher resolution works on the iPad because Apple can control how everything looks, and make everything bigger to fit the resolution better. Basically making sure that everything on the new screen will be roughly the same size as it was on the old screen, but everything will look sharper.

    However, that doesn't work with Windows. You can raise the DPI settings, but it just ends up making things look screwed up, and some things just don't adhere to the DPI setting and remain so small you can't read them. Larger resolutions on small screens just doesn't work for most people on PCs. 1080p on an 11.5" screen would be impossible to use for most people, even on a 13.3" screen it would be pretty hard for most to use.
     
    Frick says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  6. NC37

    NC37

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,198 (0.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    266
    I for one am completely for this change.

    Mostly because, it will force Apple and other devs to finally drop Intel craphics for good. Or, it may force Intel to finally get serious. Really, you can't run high res stuff on Intel. Even if it can display that much, there is no power behind it.
     
  7. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,063 (6.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,122
    The iGPU on the current Sandybridge processors is more than capable of handling 1920x1080 for everything but gaming, and even some gaming, which most people buying computer with iGPUs aren't concerned with(and most people buying iPads aren't either).

    The current Sandybridge iGPU compete very well with lower end descrete graphics, putting any more power than that in a iGPU doesn't really make sense. It is enough to do HD video and beyond and casual gaming, but anyone looking for more than that will likely use a higher end descrete GPU anyway, but it is pointless to make the general public pay for a higher end GPU that they won't use.
     
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2011
    theJesus and Easy Rhino say thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU 50 Million points folded for TPU
  8. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,838 (6.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,706
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Sounds like AU Optronics and Chimei Innolux had a breakthrough with LCD touchscreen technology. I assume that the higher resolutions screens are about the same cost to manufacture.


    Microsoft doesn't have a product that competes with iPad. They're working on Windows 8 (may or may not have a separate version for tablets) and Windows 8 obviously will handle whatever hardware it is installed.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  9. Inceptor

    Inceptor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    497 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    119
    I agree.
    1280 x 768 on a 13.3" is pretty tiny compared to a standard 19 - 23" desktop monitor @ 1920 x 1080. The pixel density is better, but everything is tiny; 1280 x 768 is difficult to get used to, I can't see a 1920 x 1080 ultrabook being a pleasant viewing experience for normal everyday tasks aside from video files.
     
  10. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,466 (4.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,268
    i know, which is why my statement is hilariously true. microsoft has always been behind the visual game because they spend so much of their resources trying to fix their mistakes.
     
  11. PVTCaboose1337

    PVTCaboose1337 Graphical Hacker

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    9,512 (2.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,143
    Location:
    San Antonio, Texas
    As much as I dislike some of what Apple does, I'm ok with higher resolutions, as if everyone uses them the cost can't be too bad for all of us!
     
  12. Trackr New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    265 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    I'm 99% sure you can edit most things to work well in a high-DPI environment.

    And if you want to it to be like that at stock, maybe Windows 8 will bring that?
     
  13. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,809 (3.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,351
    Some programs work fine but run smaller third party programs and the interface could just as well be cocked to heck and back. And smaller third party programs is what Windows is all about imo.

    This needs to be resolved before I'm interested in it.
     
    newtekie1 says thanks.
  14. 1c3d0g

    1c3d0g

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2007
    Messages:
    699 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    I don't think so much credit needs to be given to Apple for this. What's with everyone's obsession with ridiculous resolutions anyways? This only results in tiny text that need a microscope to be read properly.

    I don't care about stupid resolutions. What about the color gamut? I'm sick and tired of (especially laptops) having incredibly washed out displays with extremely poor viewing angles. Not to mention, a useless glossy display that can't be viewed easily outdoors. THIS is something notebook manufacturers should focus on, instead of wasting time with resolutions.
     
  15. mediasorcerer New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    979 (0.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    225
    Location:
    coast ,melbourne
    Hasnt the vaio z 13 inch got a 1080 screen?

    When you think about it, the screen is the main way one interfaces with there computer, so naturally one would expect that to be one area where quality is evident, but sadly it isnt mostly.
    Hopefully this will change things anyhow, win 8 may have support for larger resolutions without compromising on font size /dpi and all of that.
    About time this is!!!
     
  16. jmcslob

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,933 (1.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    475
    Location:
    Internet Heaven
    I fail to see the point of a >1080p 9.7" display.....
     
  17. mediasorcerer New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    979 (0.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    225
    Location:
    coast ,melbourne
    Maybe, i guess until you actually get to see it, id reserve my opinion, nothing wrong with hi clarity/resolution screens, even small ones, the iphone screen looks good hi res.

    But as the other poster mentioned, there are other considerations than just resolution that make a good screen.
     
  18. largon

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,780 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    432
    Location:
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Desktops have little use for higher pixel densities. Instead, focus should be put on lowering prices of larger screens, making proper RGB LED backlighting affordable and making more efficient panels with better colors.
    Also, please ban glossy screens.
     
  19. NdMk2o1o

    NdMk2o1o

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,447 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    922
    Location:
    Redditch, Worcestershire, England
    2048x1152 monitors are already inexpensive and barely a step up from 1080p, now when 2560x1440 becomes inexpensive that's when I will be interested in the desktop monitors. Though this is good news for the mobile/tablet market as others will follow suit.
     
    qubit says thanks.
  20. costinul_ala New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    Messages:
    10 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    iDisplay

    and the panels will probably still be samsung and lg ... so who's pushing who?
    i don't see the connection with the PC market and M$, sorry ...
     
  21. bostonbuddy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2011
    Messages:
    381 (0.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    39
    Wheres these cheap 2560x1440 monitors? once I've seen have been 2 to 3x the cost of a 1080p monitor, I would love to have one.
     
  22. NdMk2o1o

    NdMk2o1o

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,447 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    922
    Location:
    Redditch, Worcestershire, England
    Did you read my post?

    I said:
    "2048x1152 are inexpensive already"
    "when 2560x1440 becomes inexpensive that's when I will be interested in the desktop monitors"

    I feel like I am just repeating myself sometimes :rolleyes: :laugh:
     
  23. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,841 (3.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,490
    Location:
    Quantum well (UK)
    Good point, I was actually thinking of 2560x1440 when I wrote that up, so I'm not sure what happened there. :) I think it's a bit late to change it now though, as the comments are based on the original resolution.

    Mind you, 2048 x1152 is not all that cheap or common yet, is it?
     
  24. n-ster

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    8,859 (4.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,405
    2048x1152 is cheap, not common though. I bought mine at a 10$ price increase compared to 1080p, but that was a long time ago... They gave up on them now though, so they are very rare
     
  25. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,399 (11.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,697
    i fully support this move. the retina display on my iphone 4 is just fantastic.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page