1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Solid SSD Suggestions

Discussion in 'Storage' started by [Ion], Mar 25, 2013.

  1. [Ion]

    [Ion] WCG Team Assistant

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    11,787 (6.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,889
    Location:
    North Carolina, United States
    I'm looking to pick up a SSD for my i7 system to improve its real-world responsiveness. I think that since I also have a 500GB HDD for it, a 64GB SSD would be plenty (enough for Windows, Firefox, Office, Notepad++ and a game or two).

    I'm tempted by the Samsung 840 Pro 64GB, but it strikes me as expensive given the capacity. I suppose that for a 120/128GB disk I could spend up to $130, but I'd ideally like to spend $90 or less on a 64GB disk.

    Maximum speed isn't my primary concern; instead I'd like to make sure I get something with promising reliability.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  2. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    9,979 (6.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,228
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    64GB SSDs are not very cost effective. 120/128GB drives seem to be the best in terms of price to capacity. Even the non pro 840 or the 830s would be fine. I got my Samsung 830 for like $90 bucks on newegg. 128GB.

    OCZ Vector drive is also good. On sale right now too. Fastest drives on the market.

    OCZ Vector Series VTR1-25SAT3-128G Solid State Dr...
     
  3. [Ion]

    [Ion] WCG Team Assistant

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    11,787 (6.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,889
    Location:
    North Carolina, United States
    I'm naturally suspicious of OCZ because of their past quality issues--for a drive that I expect to last 2-3 years, would OCZ be OK?

    I have a non-pro Samsung 840 120GB that I purchased for my laptop--after I purchased it, I saw that Samsung used the cheaper 1000cycle NAND for it (vs the 3k or 5k on others)--is this realistically something to be worried about?

    And if I don't really need the extra space do you still think that 128GB makes sense? I don't have that many games that I play on a frequent basis, and the 500GB disk will certainly be good for my music/pictures/downloads.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  4. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    9,979 (6.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,228
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    I have the 128GB Samsung 830 for only a 30GB windows install and nothing else. Everything else is on my 240GB drive or 500GB platter drive and I like that that way. And no the Samsung 840 still performs well regardless of the NAND. They have done a lot of controller tweaks to compensate for it.
     
  5. [Ion]

    [Ion] WCG Team Assistant

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    11,787 (6.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,889
    Location:
    North Carolina, United States
    Performance isn't too important IMO--any SSD will still smoke my Caviar Blue. I'm more worried that it might wear out soon.

    Would the Samsung 840 Pro 128GB be a sensible choice, or should I save $20 and get the OCZ or save $40 and get the 840 non-Pro?
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  6. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    9,979 (6.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,228
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    The 840 non pro would be fine. any of them really. I just wouldn't get a 64gb drive due to the prices on nearly all of them are retarded.
     
    [Ion] says thanks.
  7. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,990 (2.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    803
    Location:
    Italy
    Also remember that the more your SSD is filled the less it performs to an extent that it may literally halve the performance.

    Getting a 64GB and having it like at 50GB would seriously hinder its performance.
     
  8. [Ion]

    [Ion] WCG Team Assistant

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    11,787 (6.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,889
    Location:
    North Carolina, United States
    The 120GB SSD (111GB usable) I had in my laptop I usually had filled to about 107 or 108GB....
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  9. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    9,979 (6.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,228
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    jesus! yeah thatll kill performance real quick.
     
  10. manofthem

    manofthem

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2011
    Messages:
    5,968 (4.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,406
    I'm tempted to offer you one of my Samsung 256gb 830s at a killer price :D I'm a huge fan of the Sammy ssds, never any issue with these bad boys
     
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD
  11. Hood

    Hood

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Messages:
    817 (1.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    246
     
  12. [Ion]

    [Ion] WCG Team Assistant

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    11,787 (6.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,889
    Location:
    North Carolina, United States
    It probably does. When I install the new SSD, I'm going to wile the 320GB HDD and put it in the optical drive bay and offload my music/pictures there. That ought to help a bit.
    Well, LMK if you decide to ;)
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  13. mosheen

    mosheen

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    321 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    55
    I just got a new kingston v300 120gb.
     
  14. jmcslob

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,926 (1.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    470
    Location:
    Internet Heaven
    I like Sandisk Extremes....I have 2 Sandisk Extreme 120's in RAID0 and they are fast....seem fairly reliable...seem to have excellent reviews as well...nobody else here on TPU seems to have em...not sure why....they are faster then a lot of the crap I see here on TPU people always rave about like M4's
     
  15. Hood

    Hood

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Messages:
    817 (1.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    246
    The Corsair Neutron GTX drives get very good reviews from users, and haven't required a firmware update (so far). Also to be considered is customer service, Corsair has the best on the planet (so people often say), others not so much.
     
  16. Chevalr1c

    Chevalr1c

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2010
    Messages:
    3,207 (2.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,387
    Location:
    NL, Europe
    My Kingston SSDNow V300 has a capacity of 120GB (like 118ish GiB (what Windows displays)), is fast (in a consistent way) and it costed 90 euro (bare drive, because a seperately bought bracket turned out cheaper for me). It has not needed any firmware updates thus far (it has been in use since January).
    A 60 GB version would be cheaper, but still cost like 70-90 dollars and be full quicker than you think (albeit only putting games on it that are truely benefitting from an SSD over a HDD, thus being selective in what to install where).

    From the sticky thread on SSD reviews:

    @jmcslob: Crucial M4 SSDs have been fairly cheap for a long while, although they have "slow" writing speeds (compared to more modern SSDs) they are still fast enough in terms of reading speeds to be an upgrade (especially for those like me, who are on SATA II). Plus, they provide a bit of overprovisioning (by my knowledge) so for some that might be a plus.
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2013
    Crunching for Team TPU
  17. Ghost

    Ghost

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    272 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    Location:
    Unknown
  18. Hood

    Hood

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Messages:
    817 (1.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    246
    SSD Bottleneck

    As I understand it, in a modern multi-core PC, the CPU is the fastest component, especially when overclocked, next is RAM (maybe 250X slower), then writing/reading to and from the SSD/HDD (100,000 to 200,000 times slower). So if you have a fast overclocked CPU and 2400 MHz RAM, you still spend most of your time waiting for the drive.
    As for SATA III 6 GB/s, the fastest SSDs are now pushing it's limits, so the only way to increase throughput there is to use RAID 0 on 2 or more drives (which may not be worth the trouble unless you do a lot of intense content creation professionally).
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page