1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Steve Ballmer: "Not the right CEO for Microsoft"

Discussion in 'General Software' started by MxPhenom 216, Jan 23, 2013.

  1. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    9,998 (6.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,238
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Very Interesting article I just read about Steve Ballmer. Apparently he uses tyrant like powers, and cuts people down if they appose him and his management style.

    http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/01/22/us-microsoft-book-idUKBRE90L04320130122

     
  2. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,697 (13.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,101
    He don't care, he just got himself a basketball team. I kinda fail to see what this has to do with software though.
     
    BrooksyX, Aquinus and MxPhenom 216 say thanks.
  3. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    9,998 (6.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,238
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    haha yes he did, well helped get one.

    To your edit, didn't know where to put it since I cant post articles or anything. And its about Microsoft and Microsoft is a software giant. Welp.
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2013
  4. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,822 (3.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,481
    Location:
    Quantum well (UK)
    I doubt Ballmer's good for anything. The writing was on the wall for Microsoft when Gates stepped down.
     
  5. Mathragh

    Mathragh

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,081 (0.61/day)
    Thanks Received:
    293
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Am I the only one that thinks that if Ballmer really was such a nitwit, he would've long been replaced or that microsoft would've done far worse?

    I mean, I can understand that many people dont like him, but (atleast as far as my knowledge goes) Microsoft isn't doing that bad? I mean they've got the most innovative products out(or in the pipeline) since a long time(whatever people might think of stuff like windows 8), and I dont think they ever adhered to so many open/widely used standards as they do at the moment(think IE10, and implementing stuff like caldev).

    Or am I missing something?
     
  6. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,252 (2.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    963
    Sometimes companies need aggressive people to cut through... but those kind of people aren't good long term for a company. And if there isnt a decent succession plan, then the company becomes a one-man survival thing, and a one-trick pony. Companies like MS and Apple and Facebook are very different from companies like Shell, Boeing, Intel. Which of those companies are more likely to survive a roadcrash of their CEO?

    However, I don't advocate "democratic-inclusive-lovey-dovey" type leadership. That just encourages rot and politic. It is a difficult balancing act. But at the end of the day, the CEO has to lead from the helm, just like a captain and his ship or his plane. You can't have everyone having a go at the steering wheel.
     
    Chevalr1c says thanks.
  7. Drone

    Drone

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,677 (1.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,377
    What company today has the right CEO anyway :rolleyes:
    They all use dirty tricks and they all are double-faced.
     
    hellrazor, remixedcat and qubit say thanks.
  8. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,647 (1.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    942
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    I kinda miss Bill Gates. He was a very charismatic man with that kinda geeky look and always a bit shy.
     
  9. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,342 (6.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,112
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    It is interesting to see what a difference in view is. Look at Bill for example, he had an idea for a company and a product and he hit the ground running. I suspect the "greed" factor has become stronger over the years and people become more interested in making money than producing a good product. Not to say that the two can't come hand in hand, but the wrong goal is being set and the CEO sets the tune for the entire company.
     
  10. Tatty_One

    Tatty_One Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    16,670 (5.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,505
    Location:
    Worcestershire, UK
    There are many styles of management and leadership..... authoritarian is just one and works very well in certain scenario's/situations. Many senior leaders adapt their style to the situation so the style is not always a refelection of their character/personality.
     
  11. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,669 (3.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,262
    So?

    And i very much agree with mathragh. MS is doing good.
     
  12. lilhasselhoffer

    lilhasselhoffer

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2011
    Messages:
    1,630 (1.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    982
    Location:
    East Coast, USA
    So, financial analysts from Forbes claims that it's time to sell MS stock (http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/121610-Forbes-Analyst-Calls-Game-Over-For-Microsoft). They base this on
    1) Relatively poor windows 8 sales performance.
    2) XBOX division requiring cash infusions.
    3) A large percentage (40 in the article) of users still 3 or more operating systems (XP) behind

    In the same week, an article comes out questioning whether MS leadership is steering the ship in the right direction.


    I have to ask, when does the US government chip in and "save" MS with a cash infusion? They did it with the airlines, and the banks. MS is obviously doing something stupid, but they're too big to fail right?

    MS is experiencing actual competition, and they haven't evolved well. They took the ballsy move of completely unifying UI over multiple devices, which didn't go over well. They introduced the surface, about three years too late to compete with the Apple offerings and two years too late to compete with the much cheaper Android offerings. It seems as though every step they make forward costs consumers more, and has a detrimental effect elsewhere.

    There is some praise to be leveled in MS's direction. They're doing a good job making the OS perform better with less resources. They have done a good job incorporating more OS level security measures.

    I don't think the excellent back end (heaven help me, I'm quoting the Mailman) can make up for poor decisions on the front end. The people who pushed for a unified UI (I remember Balmer being one, though I cannot vouch) and projects like the Kinect were completely ungrounded in this reality. That kind of decision making should only be accepted once, not time and again, from someone with Balmer's responsibility. I wish I could say that the articles about MS were coming from somewhere unfounded. I also wish I had a winning lottery ticket.
     
    Chevalr1c says thanks.
  13. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,037 (7.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,591
    This. Ive seen a few over time. Depends on who you are dealing with you have to adapt. Sometimes you have to be a bully. Other times going with a humble approach works. Depends. Honestly if Steve Ballmer came flying into a room yelling at me I would just laugh at him. If he came in and asked me kindly to step it up a little I would do some serious OT to help out.
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2013
  14. Wrigleyvillain

    Wrigleyvillain PTFO or GTFO

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    7,667 (3.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,775
    Location:
    Chicago
    lol sounds like Steve Jobs.
     
  15. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,976 (4.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,109
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    All that Microsoft could offer the gov is a bunch of Windows8 OS copies, which no sane IT manager woulk use, anyway.

    M$ has cash to bleed, they don't need a cash infusion. What they need is new talent at the helm.
     
  16. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,669 (3.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,262
    I'm not sure I agree with that article. Windows 8 have, afaik, not done bad. It moved the same amount of Windows 7 licenses, and that was considered a decent thing. Are they troubled? Well yes they will face tough times, as will everyone else (except maybe Apple). And I don't think it's obvious they are doing something stupid.

    Also I think it is a wee bit unfair to compare Surface tweets to iPad tweets. The iPad, and Android tablets, have been around for years now, the Surface RT (as the big one hasn't been released yet) have been around for a couple of months.

    The only reality this has in it is Windows Phone, which hasn't been a success worthy of Apple. But it isn't a total failure yet either. As for PC's.. Yes sales there are declining, but Windows is still a de facto standard in many environments and the PC is not dead yet. And this is why Ballmer is doing what he's doing I think: Redefining Windows. We have just seen the beginning.

    Isn't especially Office their cashcow? If so I don't see how trying to prolong that is a problem. If anything it's the "right" thing to do. But Office is changing too.

    Will see. 50% is a lot. I don't believe it, but as said we'll see.

    I don't know enough about this to comment, but couldn't this change when a new console is out and have matured? If they hold onto it that long that is.

    Moving to the cloud is exactly what MS is doing. Azure, integrated Skydrive, Office 365.. MS are changing, have changed quite a bit in the last couple of years. It feels like this was written in the mid 2000's.

    Interesting article, but I think it's too much doom and gloom there.

    Oh Dave no.. :(

    Using the term "M$" should result in an instaban. As well as iCrap or whathaveyou.
     
  17. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,976 (4.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,109
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    I feel it is very to the point, myself. Microsoft is a business, which is about making money...by selling software. It seems to me, on a personal level, that they are now more about the money, than they are the software, and Ballmer is part of that.


    I mean, OK, we got Windows8, clearly suited for tablets...and mainly surface...yet here it is on tonnes of OEM boxes and such...because it makes them money. And this is even though most businesses, which account for the majority of PC sales, still aren't interested in Windows7.

    That's my opinion, and really, I'm not asking anyone to really agree with that...it's just how I feel. It's not making fun of anyone, or flame baiting, so it's not something that'd get anyone banned.

    Unlike that religious thread, where everyone seems to think the reins have been let go. :p
     
  18. lilhasselhoffer

    lilhasselhoffer

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2011
    Messages:
    1,630 (1.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    982
    Location:
    East Coast, USA
    I would like to think that a person who is part of Forbes is wired to be overly cautious. I never said I agreed with all of the author's points. I think some are valid, but the tone and information presented were all designed to make MS look as bad as possible.

    Actually addressing all of the points of that article would take another thread. I brought it up in passing, but failed to elaborate. This was an oversight on my part.



    Why? Microsoft is a business. Successful businesses are about the money. Ever consider that all that visceral hate for Walmart will never be enough to kill it, and it's precisely because they are untouchable on the business end.

    I come from the school of thought that evil can create beauty just as easily as good.



    Yeah.... I know the MS money castle runs deep. I also know that banks have plenty of money and the airlines made insane profits for years. Even the biggest businesses can be maimed and destroyed if they lack solid leadership.

    I can't say that MS is anywhere near actually needing cash. It'll be windows 9 at least before then.





    As a final point, consider that the most purchased application from the store is one that removes the new UI and replaces it with a more traditional one. If failure of good intentions can be quantified in a more concise manner I can't think of it.
     
  19. remixedcat

    remixedcat

    Joined:
    May 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,839 (1.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    611
    I would have rather had Sinofsky leading MS. He had some great ideas and turned MS around. MS was stagnating.
     
  20. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,433 (4.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,243
    Hey look, a thread full of people who have never run a business slamming a man in charge of one of the most successful companies in the world...
     
  21. hellrazor

    hellrazor

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,577 (0.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    319
    I never thought I'd hear that, but now I agree with it. What has this world come to?
     
  22. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    9,998 (6.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,238
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Worthless post is worthless............. :rolleyes:
     
  23. Chevalr1c

    Chevalr1c

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2010
    Messages:
    3,212 (2.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,388
    Location:
    NL, Europe
    There seems merit in it though. Good point Easy, I did not think of that yet.

    (I am not being sarcastic or so, I am meaning it)
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  24. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,433 (4.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,243
    how is it worthless? balmer took over in 2000 and MSFT continued to thrive. we have a lot of armchair CEOs here who think they know enough to criticize a man running a multinational company.
     
  25. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    9,998 (6.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,238
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Its the way he said it.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page