1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

THQ files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, will continue to operate

Discussion in 'Games' started by natr0n, Dec 19, 2012.

  1. Frag Maniac

    Frag Maniac

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2010
    Messages:
    2,366 (1.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    474
    I have to wonder if they'd continued the RF series better with something more akin to a modernized version of Guerrilla, and not canned the series altogether, they'd have survived this better.

    RF and Metro are really the only games they make that I like. This is not a big enough outfit to weather dropping one of their most popular series after ending it with a pretty bad installment in Armageddon.

    It's a lack of rational priorities like this that can do in some pub/dev teams. I have to wonder if Codemasters is headed the same direction. They've put off making a sequel of one of their most popular games (GRID) for years in favor of cranking out one crap title after another in the F1, Flashpoint and DiRT franchises. Eventually that takes a toll on you.
  2. ViperXTR

    ViperXTR

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,394 (1.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    407
    Call of Duty “stamped out memories” of what made FPS games great, says THQ
    http://www.pcgamer.com/2012/12/22/c...el=ref&ns_source=steam&ns_linkname=0&ns_fee=0
  3. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,127 (1.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    458
    THQ is paying too much to make games, and using budgets as large as the entire development budget to market them. It's horribly wasteful and has not paid off in the slightest.

    More than likely they will retain those titles actually. Saints Row has become very successful, and a SR4 would actually sell very well and bring them much needed revenue--reliable revenue. Metro would probably be the only one auctioned off--if any, but CoH is another game that THQ could rely on bringing in profit. I would not be surprised if they sold they sold Homefront 2--since Crytek is attached to it--and got top dollar. The first one didn't sell bad, it was just a let down in the CoD-era market.

    So you'd rather see THQ pumping out mediocre low budget iOS games than something like Saints Row 4? Hell, Homefront 2 is being made by Crytek UK, and that will definitely be an excellent game, and should sell fairly well. They have a lot of great games nearing completion--the South Park game will be great, Homefront 2 will be great, Saints Row 4 would be awesome, and CoH2 would be awesome. Metro LL is kind of a toss up, but other than that they have a lot of solid titles coming out, just need time to get them out.

    Advertising is their biggest issue. I have seen so many ads for THQ games in recent months, an excessive amount to say the least.

    Actually 2014. Rumors peg Microsoft announcing it early 2013, and releasing it in either fall (similar to what Nintendo did with the Wii U) or pushing it to mid 2014.
  4. Naito

    Naito

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    279 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    82
    Location:
    Terra Australis
    Company of Heroes, milked? I don't think so; a sequel isn't even out yet. The game is years old and had 2 expansions, which is a pretty standard affair.

    Metro is not milked either, with only one game, with the title, currently released.
  5. rtwjunkie

    rtwjunkie

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,070 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    336
    Location:
    Louisiana
    Wait...how were the Flashpoint games crap? I found them to be super well-done, accurate, and tried very hard to instill a sense of realism into the FPS genre. I prefer that to the so absolutely fake COD franchise that has kids thinking war is fast and just run and gun. The Flashpoint games forced you to think and plan tactically, and move methodically to your objective.

    Seems like that takes alot of work. I actually think they haven't "cranked out" the series. It's usually a long wait.

    Just my two cents.
  6. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,463 (5.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,207
  7. OneMoar

    OneMoar

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Messages:
    2,896 (1.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    622
    Location:
    Rochester area
    THQ has ruined many a promising franchise I am not sorry to see them go
  8. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,342 (6.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,361
    Location:
    IA, USA
    If they are sold, there's a very good chance it will eventually be published. You don't buy a property unless you intend to get a return on investment for it.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  9. AsRock

    AsRock TPU addict

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2007
    Messages:
    10,750 (4.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,641
    Location:
    US
    Shame to as i found it much more fun than any COD game for a long time now, in fact the only COD game i enjoyed was the 1st one lol.
  10. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,463 (5.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,207
    keyword being 'eventually'

    alternative keyword being 'Duke Nukem Forever'
  11. RCoon

    RCoon Forum Gypsy

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2012
    Messages:
    6,496 (7.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,870
    Location:
    Gypsyland, UK
    Shame, my favourite developer. Huge and repetative fan of the Warhammer 40k, metro, stalker and darksiders series.
  12. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,342 (6.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,361
    Location:
    IA, USA
    All these studios are already working on projects. They can't work on another title until their current project is done. The reason why DNF took forever is because they refused to sell until a few years back. It was constantly underfunded and no one knew who actually had the rights to it. It was a giant legal mess until Gearbox bought it.
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2013
    Crunching for Team TPU
  13. Kreij

    Kreij Senior Monkey Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    13,881 (5.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,615
    Location:
    Cheeseland (Wisconsin, USA)
    There are several vultures circling around the THQ assets. They include Electronic Arts, Warner Bros. and the latest addition being Double Fine. There is no indication as to what these publishers are looking to buy as the IP is not the only thing up for auction. There are studios and one would assume other assets like hardware (workstations, servers, etc.).

    The only reason someone would buy an IP and kill it would be to eliminate any perceived competition or to nab artwork that has copyrights attached for use in their own IP. Quite possible this could happen as it has occurred in the past when someone snagged a company.

    It will be very interesting to see where all the assets end up.
    You, or course, would know this if you read NPU (another cheap plug). :D
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2013
    Chevalr1c says thanks.
  14. OneMoar

    OneMoar

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Messages:
    2,896 (1.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    622
    Location:
    Rochester area

    publishers are one the ones responsible for milking decent games untill there worth nothing
    publishers are the ones responsible for bad console ports and buggy games
    publishers are the ones responsible for annoying DRM
    publisher != developer
    Developers are the ones that spend untold hours in front of lines of code only to be tould to scrap 80% of it and start over
    developers are the ones that die a little on the inside when unfinished code walks out the door because some n00b in a suite thinks its ready and its not
    Developers are the ones that get paid ONCE and make nothing after the game is out
    Developers are the ones that need to work extra hours to implement bad drm into relatively good code
    Developers are the ones that suffer when the community goes to the publisher demanding blood and the developer studios are feed to the beast to quell it
    so yea you can keep your filthy "publishers"
  15. Kreij

    Kreij Senior Monkey Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    13,881 (5.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,615
    Location:
    Cheeseland (Wisconsin, USA)
    This post is filled with misconceptions, inaccurate assessment, half truths and wild generalizations that paint all publishers into the same picture when the is not the case at all.

    While there are problems with some publishers I would recommend doing a little research on the realities of game development and the game industry in general.
    Frick and Chevalr1c say thanks.
  16. OneMoar

    OneMoar

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Messages:
    2,896 (1.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    622
    Location:
    Rochester area
    all publishers are evil
    death to all publishers
  17. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,127 (1.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    458
    Publishers are the gaming industries equivalent of Record Labels. Neither are organizations I particularly like, but they do serve a purpose. In gaming, they are arguably a lot more important, because getting the funding for a project is so hard otherwise (and don't try and sell me on that Kickstarter crap, how many of those projects have come out and weren't let downs?) and the marketing if done correctly helps a lot.

    I think the problem is that Publishers don't care if a game is fun, or interesting, or innovative, as long as it sells as many copies as imaginable. Where as Developers put their reputations on the line with each game, Publishers have no issue if a specific game doesn't sell as long as they can recoup the losses elsewhere. A major problem is that Publishers own all the IP Rights to most games, so they end up with a lot of bargaining power when it comes to what goes into the games. An ideal publisher would leave the developers to their own devices and concentrate on marketing and shipping the game.
  18. kn00tcn

    kn00tcn

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2009
    Messages:
    656 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    116
    Location:
    Toronto
    sometimes there are pseudo publishing deals that leave the dev a little more freedom, technically crytek is part of EA partners isnt it? how about shank, gatling gears, bulletstorm, etc
  19. illli

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2012
    Messages:
    150 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16
    i dunno. i thought that list described EA pretty accurately
  20. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,342 (6.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,361
    Location:
    IA, USA
    They are developed by independent studios and published by EA. Unfortunately, THQ is selling studios so there's no chance of that happening here unless private individuals are at the auction (like Chris Schilling) with capital to make the studio run on its own.
    Chevalr1c says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  21. yogurt_21

    yogurt_21

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,357 (1.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    550
    Location:
    AZ
    based on past history one thing is clear, if titles are bought they will be more expensive for us to purchase.

    pretty much anything Activision or EA has purchased has become more expensive to buy. I'm quite glad I picked up that THQ pack on steam.

    metro last light might be one of those titles that gets picked up, if it does expect a 60$+ launch that might not get cheaper and will be full of holes that you must buy dlc to fill.

    Sad really because THQ only really had cosmetic dlc.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page