1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

TIM is Behind Ivy Bridge Temperatures After All

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, May 12, 2012.

?

Should Intel release a new IVB revision to address temperatures?

  1. Yes, more OC potential is needed

    109 vote(s)
    75.2%
  2. Yes, but not immediately

    18 vote(s)
    12.4%
  3. No, Ivy Bridge works great

    18 vote(s)
    12.4%
  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,198 (11.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,569
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    It's proven: the thermal interface material (TIM) used by Intel, inside the integrated heatspreader (IHS) of its Core "Ivy Bridge" processors are behind its higher than expected load temperatures. This assertion was first made in late-April by an Overclockers.com report, and was recently put to test by Japanese tech portal PC Watch, in which an investigator carefully removed the IHS of a Core i7-3770K processor, removed the included TIM and binding grease, and replaced them with a pair of aftermarket performance TIMs, such as OCZ Freeze and Coolaboratory Liquid Pro.

    PC Watch findings show that swapping the TIM, if done right, can shave stock clock (3.5 GHz, Auto voltage) temperatures by as much as 18% (lowest temperatures by the Coolaboratory TIM), and 4.00 GHz @ 1.2V temperatures by as much as 23% (again, lowest temperatures on the Coolaboratory TIM). The change in TIM was also change the overclockability of the chip, which was then able to sustain higher core voltages to facilitate higher core clock speeds. The report concluded that Intel's decision to use thermal paste inside the IHS of its Ivy Bridge chips, instead of fluxless solder, poses a very real impact on temperatures and overclockability.

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Source: PC Watch
  2. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    11,934 (4.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,334
    so basically someone was thinkin it be cheaper or to cater to extreme overclockers
  3. SuperSonic X 316 New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    40 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    I upgraded to an Ivy Bridge from a Phenom II; this is pretty disappointing to hear and has kind of left me with a bad image of Intel. :\ Still looking forward to Haswell for another upgrade though.
  4. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    11,934 (4.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,334
    1150
  5. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,496 (1.96/day)
    Thanks Received:
    930
    Odd. Earlier tests showed no temp change.
  6. arterius2

    Joined:
    May 21, 2011
    Messages:
    491 (0.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    103
    i'm sure someone will come up with the idea to mount the HSF directly to the bare chip (without the IHS) and lower the temps even further :laugh:
    OneCool says thanks.
  7. swirl09

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2011
    Messages:
    42 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Not exactly fightin' words ;-p How bad does that make AMD look, you moved from them to intel, dont like the news about your new chip and your still looking forward to another chip from intel ^_^'

    Anyway... I did read those posts about cheap grease being the possible culprit to ivy's higher temps, but not being much of an OCer it didnt deter me and I must say Im pretty happy with the temps on mine so far.
    [​IMG]
    Those are cooler than average temps. Typical idle so far is about 30c, all Ive done with the chip is EZ mode ^.^ Gaming has the chip running @4.22 on 1.19V which results in max 51c
  8. SuperSonic X 316 New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    40 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    Socket? Yes, I'm aware I'm going to need to switch motherboards. This one will be reused on my media PC. I went with a cheaper one too due to that, an ASUS Maximus V Gene; I only needed 1 PCI-E slot and I didn't want to pay another extra 100 just for the extra 2-3 PCI-E slots I wouldn't touch.
  9. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    11,934 (4.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,334
    If the Price on that board drops, otherwise for a HTPC any motherboard will due (It comes to my notion it wont be overclocked)
    Last edited: May 12, 2012
  10. reverze

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,368 (0.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    131
    sad to hear, will need a revision to make it interesting for enthousiasts
  11. DualAmdMP New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2011
    Messages:
    54 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Location:
    USA NY
    I think you are wrong about Intel. I'm actually glad that they used TIM instead of solder on the core. You need to try to put a waterblock directly on the core (once in your life) and you will be surprised how well it conducts heat into water compare to IHS + waterblock. XS forum has a lot of info on this topic.

    I has few Athlon X2 (65nm/90nm) running with waterblock directly on the Core. No matter how much voltage i pumped into the CPU, the temperatures were always great!

    I hope AMD doesthe same thing with their new FX line.

    If you don't care about watercooling the CPU for max overclock or low temperature, then just ignore me:D
    Last edited: May 12, 2012
  12. function69 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Messages:
    60 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Hey, at least it's a cheap and easy fix; 10 minutes and you have a 15 degree drop in temps.

    Also, how about ditching the IHS altogether and attaching the cooler directly to the core, or will the pressure cause it to crack?
    Last edited: May 12, 2012
  13. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    11,934 (4.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,334
    I recall everyone bitching at how the Core Line Up You couldnt remove the IHS without wrecking the core, now people are bitching they used a cheap TIM on it so you could remove the IHS to get further in capability, I dont get the Intel fans honestly, does anything satisfy them???
  14. Xzibit

    Xzibit

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,086 (1.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    241
    Since its Friday. I will be the first one to call B.S. on this.

    1) I'm lazy and I could have done that graph

    2) No video

    3) The OC just looks lazy like .05. More of a graph you find on the back of the Freeze and Liquid Pro so back to 1^

    4) From the few pics hes got up there this guy is no Doctor with his hands.

    5) I cant read spanish that well

    6) W1z didnt include a temp review on the Ivy-Bridge so i'll have to say it isnt true

    :p
  15. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    9,564 (6.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,023
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    you must be high. We don't need a video for this. The overclock is not lazy at all from 3.5ghz to 4.6, and maybe you should learn another language so you can read these things :p
  16. RejZoR

    RejZoR

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2004
    Messages:
    4,424 (1.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    872
    Location:
    Europe/Slovenia
    Still, it's a very sloppy job. Tell me, what will happen after 3 or 5 years when this crappy TIM will turn into an useless powder? Things will get even worse just because someone at Intel wanted to save some bucks. Not cool. I'll skip this series anyway since they wouldn't really give me much extra compared to my good ol' Bloomfield at 3,8GHz...
  17. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    11,934 (4.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,334
    you have more capability than 1155 atleast with slot configurations
  18. PopcornMachine

    PopcornMachine

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,563 (0.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    459
    Location:
    Los Angeles/Orange County CA
    If I were shopping for a CPU now, I would gladly pay an extra penny, maybe even a nickel, for a chip with fluxless solder.

    Fortunately for me, I'm not shopping for a CPU.
  19. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,541 (2.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    842
    I hope intel fixes this with later batches... well at least the K and X series chips you know, this means a lot to people.

    Still, no reason for me to ditch the trusty 2500K in sight :D
  20. NC37

    NC37

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,165 (0.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    257
    Exactly. You'll need to buy a new board for Haswell. Might as well get as much out of Ivy as you can.
    eidairaman1 says thanks.
  21. kajson

    kajson

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Messages:
    144 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    27
    I would be amazed if there'd be a stepping later on with a proper IHS, because that would mean that someone like myself would just have to fry their cpu, and use my 20$ intel no questions asked insurance policy to get a brand new flashy high oc cpu in return. :eek:
    Last edited: May 12, 2012
  22. Rowsol

    Rowsol

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    Messages:
    566 (0.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    80
    when I first heard of this someone said it was just the prerelease chips. Now I'm hearing all the chips are like this. I hope they fix this with a new revision.
  23. Dj-ElectriC

    Dj-ElectriC

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,135 (1.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    812
    Now shiz gets real... I also really hope intel will fix it. This was a big deal breaker for me.
  24. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,496 (1.96/day)
    Thanks Received:
    930
    Weak sauce man. When are you going to upgrade?

    Anyways if they were insane enough to do that for extreme clockers (like .001% of buyers) they'd of said something about it to put a positive spin on this mess.
  25. Dent1

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Messages:
    3,059 (2.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    869
    Where is Trickson? He has spent years in every AMD Forum and thread bashing AMD. Now where is he when Intel are looking like a bad choice. :)


    As far as this topic, maybe Intel can fix the temparatures with an stepping revision?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page