1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

TSeries TA990FXE Leads AM3+ Charge for Biostar

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, May 31, 2011.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,614 (11.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,648
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Biostar is keeping a low profile with high-end motherboards, these days. It's been a long while since the company released its last TPower-branded motherboard, but has been pushing its 'value' TSeries motherboards into every segment. One such offering for the AMD socket AM3+ platform is the Biostar TSeries TA990FXE. Based on the AMD 990FX + SB950 chipset, this board packs a lot of high-end styling with its heatsinks and components load-out. It packs a 4+1 phase VRM to power the AM3+ socket, and dual-channel DDR3 memory. Current generation Phenom II, and future FX Series processors are supported.

    Expansion slots include four PCI-Express 2.0 x16 (x16/x4/x16/x4), and two PCI. There are five internal SATA 6 Gb/s ports, with the sixth one being assigned as eSATA. Most other connectivity is fairly standard for this category, you've got 8-channel HD audio, four USB 3.0 ports (two by header), and gigabit Ethernet. The board features standard AMIBIOS, and some overclocker-accessible features such as power/reset switches and diagnostic LED.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: May 31, 2011
  2. devguy

    devguy

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,239 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    171
    Location:
    SoCal
    990FX + non black socket = :confused:
     
  3. Damn_Smooth

    Damn_Smooth New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,435 (1.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    478
    Location:
    A frozen turdberg.
    I get the 940fx. (890+990)/2
     
  4. micropage7

    micropage7

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    5,849 (3.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,354
    Location:
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    wow, it aint photoshoped right?
    i like the red color
    biostar board is friendly to your wallet and the performance is good
     
  5. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,310 (1.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    481
    PCIe slot layout is an epic failure.
     
  6. crazyeyesreaper

    crazyeyesreaper Chief Broken Rig

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    8,151 (4.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,789
    Location:
    04578
    to bad its only a 4+1 phase vrm means the board is likely to pop when overclocked much like the MSI boards that were known to catch fire under heavy overclocks with Phenom II x4 and x6 cpus.. to bad really i was hoping Biostar would have a good board but they went with a terrible design layout and cheaped out on the VRMs
     
  7. jalex3 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    187 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    bad layout.... :shadedshu
     
  8. devguy

    devguy

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,239 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    171
    Location:
    SoCal
    Yup, Gigabyte tried this layout a while back. It was a poor idea then, and a poor idea now, but at least they had an 8+2 power phase.
     
  9. Strider

    Strider

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    Messages:
    51 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    Biostar is a good brand that's been around for a long time. I have used many of them in many builds over the years, and none have let me down. I have used a few of these T-Series boards, the most recent in a re-build for my wife. Fantastic series from Biostar. Good price to performance when you break it down.

    Looks like this new AM3+ T-Series board will be another good product from Biostar.
     
  10. crazyeyesreaper

    crazyeyesreaper Chief Broken Rig

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    8,151 (4.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,789
    Location:
    04578
    doubtfull it will be a good board at least for overclocking or multi gpu, Biostar used to shine offering enthusiast layouts and a good vrm with a simple design at a great price

    4+1 phase power means the board is in the same boat as previous MSI FX boards that used 4+1 and the number of those boards that burnt up and caught fire is crazy.

    Shitty layout
    Low quality 4+1 phase VRM
    5 sata ports. I already use 5 gonna up that to 7 soon

    with a better layout and vrm design the board would be worth a look as i can pass up sata ports if i need to but just damn great LOOKING board but lacking any real punch would rather just buy a better quality 990x board that will have better VRM and layout but be cheaper
     
  11. Dopamin3 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2007
    Messages:
    36 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Just because it's 4+1 doesn't mean it sucks. You guys need to understand quality is a major factor. The Biostar 890FX only used a 5+1 phase, but you didn't see reports of it exploding did you? No, it could capably handle all hexacores overclocked. MSI 4+1 phases were terrible quality, that's why they were prone to failure On the other hand, it seems these Biostar boards use much better quality VRMs, chokes, and everything that lead to a better quality board capable of overclocking.

    However, only 5 SATA ports and the horrible expansion layout ruins the board anyway.
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2011
  12. Suhidu

    Suhidu

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    163 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    75
    Location:
    Florida, USA
    This very similar 890fx board (ta890fxe) was a 4+2 phase design, and this 890gx board (ta890gxe) was a 4+1 phase design. Both of which have many fans, and post great records. It seems not all phases are the same.
    Those two were also quite affordable relatively, especially the ta890fxe.
     
  13. crazyeyesreaper

    crazyeyesreaper Chief Broken Rig

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    8,151 (4.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,789
    Location:
    04578
    well tell that to users of MSI's miltary grade component boards

    and oh biostar boards popped to dont think they didnt give me a minute ill get the list for you all.

    http://www.overclock.net/amd-cpus/943109-why-vrms-big-issue-why-choose.html

    and heres a google spread sheet with all the info on the motherboards and there failures and why they failed

    https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=0Avoxk_HEpJEbdDYyU3BOenBQRWhSdkpKejFwQzBUTXc&w=100&h=1400

    now i dont give a damn HOW you want to word it a 4+1 phase vrm on a top end chipset board is just BS, in all respect this will probably be onyl $10-20 cheaper then a good 990FX and it probably wont even compare to a 990x that would be cheaper ill stand by my points 4+1 isnt enough if overclocking , stock sure, but then who buys a 990FX board for there own rig and stays at stock speeds?
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2011
  14. Suhidu

    Suhidu

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    163 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    75
    Location:
    Florida, USA
    I actually linked to that thread in my post as well. A quote from it:
    And my point was simply that the TA990FXE seems pretty similar to the TA890FXE.
     
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2011
  15. crazyeyesreaper

    crazyeyesreaper Chief Broken Rig

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    8,151 (4.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,789
    Location:
    04578
    i still wouldnt trust it, difference in price from a 4+1 to an 8+2 isnt that large again when boards are out the Biostar will be what $20 cheaper? would you get the biostar board over a better quality board for such a tiny difference? i wouldnt now when it comes to overclocking.

    and the 890 was a 4+2 this is a 4+1 thats slightly lower quality not by any large margin but it does mean the 990fx has a lesser vrm design then the 890
     
  16. nanohead New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2007
    Messages:
    122 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Nearly identical to the 890FX board I have from them. I will NOT buy this one. The SATA layout and PCIe layout are lousy, and the BIOS is simply not up to par for a gamer. I really like Biostar board, and we have 7 of them in my family for all the regular machines and servers, but for gaming and tweaking, they have a looooonnnnnnggggg way to go
     
  17. Jizzler

    Jizzler

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,421 (1.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    639
    Location:
    Geneva, FL, USA
    Chop it to mATX, design win! ;)
     
  18. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,310 (1.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    481
    Now that's an idea.
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page