1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

TSMC Faces Acute 28 nm Capacity Shortage

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Apr 6, 2012.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,713 (11.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,669
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Taiwan's premier semiconductor foundry, TSMC, is reportedly facing an acute shortage in 28 nm manufacturing capacity. This shortage is expected to relax in Q3, 2012, according to sources. Qualcomm, AMD, and NVIDIA are the three biggest patrons of the 28 nm process, Qualcomm uses it to manufacture performance ARM application processors, while AMD and NVIDIA use it for their new generation GPUs. Although launched at the very end of Q4 2011, AMD's HD 7970 shipped a relatively small volume due to low manufacturing capacity. NVIDIA launched only two 28 nm GPUs, the GTX 680, and GT 640M, and has had to delay launch of more models, due to this reason, according to source. Qualcomm, meanwhile, shifted some of its orders to UMC.

    [​IMG]

    Source: DigiTimes
     
  2. NC37

    NC37

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,197 (0.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    266
    Again...almost every time I see news about them, it is bad news of some form. Production problems or unable to meet demand. How are competitors not capitalizing on this?
     
  3. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,469 (6.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,190
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    Because competitors are having the same problem?
     
  4. DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    How is it bad news? Selling all your stock is a good thing. So not having enough capacity could just mean they're doing good business.
     
  5. DarkOCean

    DarkOCean

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,618 (0.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    350
    Location:
    on top of that big mountain on mars(Romania)
    soo this means they can jack prices up on 28 nm parts and everything is ok right?:(
     
  6. AsRock

    AsRock TPU addict

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2007
    Messages:
    11,000 (4.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,723
    Location:
    US
    Yes but the fail rate all so adds to cost too. I would like to know the fail %.
     
  7. woopadidoo New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2012
    Messages:
    3 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    If a (oh no, car analogy!) car manufacturer had acute manufacturing capacity of say 10 cars a day, and calling it doing good business is well within acute twisted reasoning/logic.
     
  8. Kreij

    Kreij Senior Monkey Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    13,881 (4.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,616
    Location:
    Cheeseland (Wisconsin, USA)
    If they expect the capacity problem to be temporary (as the OP states) it doesn't make sense to invest millions of dollars to increase the capacity for 28nm if in that time period you don't project to have a stellar ROI.
    Better to just run at full capacity with shortages and when the demand slows, still be running at full capacity and not end up with idle equipment.
     
    Chevalr1c says thanks.
  9. DanTheBanjoman Señor Moderator

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,553 (2.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,383
    Unfortunately a car analogy is pointless here, though to reply to it anyway, what was the original capacity? The article doesn't say capacity acutely lowered because some plant blew up. Seems demand went up a lot faster than they could handle. Meaning they can sell 100% of their capacity which isn't a bad thing. Not for them, in the short term anyway.
     
  10. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,251 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    293
    Never heard on Samsung, IBM or Intel to have so many issues...:shadedshu
     
    Last edited: Apr 6, 2012
  11. Patriot

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    187 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    Samsung... arm vs high end gpus...

    And Intel serves themselves so they can decide to delay a launch because "there isn't enough competition" ...
    IB delayed 3x now.
     
  12. eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    13,022 (4.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,641
    Seems chinese fab plants are having way too many issues. Time for AMD to go IBM/GLOFO
     
  13. Casecutter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,167 (0.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Location:
    So. Cal.
    They already did that back in Aug 2011 by 20-25%, long before AMD/Nvidia had caught wind that TSMC (again) was going to have these problems once actual production started. Once TSMC got moving fulfilling AMD then Nvidia orders crap goes wrong and shortages kill the best laid plans. This is just confirmation that as reported by others that TSMC had already stop production to completely source and fix the problem(s) several weeks ago. Here's the problem with say AMD going with Glo-F, if they have issue in production while TSMC doesn't, you let your competition skip ahead, if they both stay with TSMC they both live and die by the same master.

    I see the price increase and chance of low yields as to Nvidia stopping a GK100. If it was a big die, the price increase and the amount yield (because I believe Nvidia buys the entire wafer, not good chips... correct) that would have really impacted their ability to supply what has already kind of turn into a expensive top-shelf product line (there was such a push back on AMD at $550) that Nvidia really knew even with Boost (and components and PCB) to control a GK100 part it was never going into the market for less than $600 and no matter the performance, they might not get a good ROI if thing went right... if they went wrong like this they would've really been up a creek... today. They did the right thing after they heard that TSMC would not be providing the normal encomic’s that most every shrink have provided in past times.
     
  14. Andy77 New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    119 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    This: AMD's HD 7970 shipped a relatively small volume due to low manufacturing capacity. NVIDIA [...] has had to delay launch of more models, due to this reason,
     
  15. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,149 (1.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    463
    Location:
    Burlington, VT
    GloFo was part of the reason Bulldozer took so long. TSMC is the only place that isn't Intel running sub-30nm production on a large scale. I believe GloFo is working on it, but I am almost 100% positive IBM isn't. That's the issue with being on the bleeding edge of technological capabilities, you have to deal with these kinds of issues.

    Nvidia is building a decent stockpile of their lower offerings before releasing them. AMD did a paper launch so they could announce it when the initial shipments came in, and wait for more to come while the hard launch day approached. Nvidia doesn't want to launch without product on shelves. They are hoping it will fly right off the shelves none-the-less.
     
  16. imitation

    imitation New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2011
    Messages:
    131 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Ferrari shipped an average of eighteen cars a day in 2010. Yet they have 2700 employees and made almost two billion Euros that year. I'd call that doing damn good business.
     
    Last edited: Apr 6, 2012
  17. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,969 (3.92/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,784
    tsmc is worth 80 billion dollars, their stock price has been going up nicely. so it's working well for tsmc
     
  18. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,411 (2.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    572
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    wasnt TSMC expanding its 28nm production facillities ,due to come online Q3_4 2012 , they will be getting orders all over the show since telecoms chip manufaturers have jumped on the node bandwaggon too now due to higher com chip speeds and bandwidths etc
     
    More than 25k PPD
  19. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,052 (4.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,211
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    +1.

    AMD has launched the full 7-series line, Nvidia has launched a couple of chips, but it's being made known that TSMC doesn't have the capacity for Nvidia to release more chips.


    As far as I am concerned, TSMC has no problems with 28nm. Just certain partners already bought up all the wafers.

    Yes, and this is why there is news we must wait until the fall for GF110 from nV, becuase TSMC does not have the capacity to produce more chips to allow nV to ahve stock of this design. This is a good news item for TSMC, that has a bit of bad news for NVidia, and that is all.
     
  20. Casecutter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,167 (0.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    87
    Location:
    So. Cal.
    What exact product are you talking about Tahiti, Pitcairn, Cape Verde?

    I think the Pitcairn is they one the release 2 weeks before intail stock and now no issues. I'd rather see that then dribble what's a drop in the bucket of orginal refererance cards then wait 3... weeks or whatever till AIB bring their higher priced "customs" to market. For Nvidia to drop what probably maybe 1200 in the worldwide market to claim that it's not a "paper launch then cards in two weeks" beats a "soft launch" with no definite stocking dates. :roll:
     
  21. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,251 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    293
    What does this have to do with anything???:shadedshu
     
  22. Andy77 New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    119 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11
    That made no sense whatsoever! If you're PR'ing for nvidia you did a lousy job.

    NV moaned they don't do paper launches but seeing how all 680's on newegg are out of stock, never mind my local shops having a very limited supply of one brand out of three, how is that better than AMD's 7900, 7800 and 7700 being available for purchase, and also calling AMD a paper-launch company.

    Anyway... keep insisting on your views but the quote I posted above from the article is saying plain and clear that availability is terrible, which answers the original question: yes, it is lower, and it will continue to be on the low until Q3. This is in line with what Charlie Demerjian posted a while back about TSMC shutting down lines... THIS is exactly what happens if lines are getting shut down, no matter the PR or any denial of such events by TSMC.
     
  23. marsey99

    marsey99

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,592 (0.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    299
    am i the only 1 thinking this is just to scare people into buying at inflated prices?

    i mean its not like there are fabs on every corner under cutting each other as its a hefty investment to build the latest fab tech.
     
  24. Benetanegia

    Benetanegia New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,683 (1.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    694
    Location:
    Reaching your left retina.
    Because a paper launch is when you review your products and don't sell them after a later date. AMD paper launched HD7970 because they made reviews in December, but retail availability didn't happen until January.

    In practice the effects on us are the same and IMO both AMD and Nvidia should have released less GPUs at a time in order to ensure proper availability (and fair prices). Intead they chose to take advantage of the situation and make a bigger profit, rising prices and using the shrtage as an excuse.

    No.
     
  25. m1dg3t

    m1dg3t

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    2,247 (1.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    513
    Location:
    Canada
    This was expected, based on the new's posted a week or so ago about TSMC expanding their facilities. I think Nvidia had them make this statement to quell all the fuss about the lack of 6xx series GPU's on the market.

    Regarding "paper launches" both companies do it, they always have and they always will! Get used to it, if you haven't already :eek: At least this time ATi was able to bring their product to market within a short enough time of announcing it, think it was 2 - 3 week's between announcing & availability, hopefully thing's improve as i'd like to see actual competition instead of what we have now :cool:
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page